51 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Negative priming and occasion setting in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure
Rats received training in which two auditory target stimuli, X and Y, were signaled by two visual stimuli, A and B, and followed by food (i.e., A→X1, B→Y+). The test consisted of presentations of X and Y preceded either by the same signal as during training (same trials: A→X, B→Y) or by the alternative signal (different trials: A→Y, B→X). After 8 training sessions, the animals responded less on same trials than on different trials; this effect was significantly reduced after 24 training sessions. In two additional experiments, animals that had also experienced presentations of A and B alone, either before or during training, showed the opposite pattern of results, responding more on same trials than on different trials. These results are interpreted as being due to the interaction between the effects of occasion setting andnegative priming (see Wagner, 1981)
TEXTURE AND COLOUR CHANGES IN MEAT DURING COOKING RELATED TO THERMAL DENATURATION OF MUSCLE PROTEINS
Are preventive and generative causal reasoning symmetrical? Extinction and competition
We tested whether preventive and generative reasoning processes are symmetrical by keeping the training and testing of preventive (inhibitory) and generative (excitatory) causal cues as similar as possible. In Experiment 1, we extinguished excitors and inhibitors in a blocking design, in which each extinguished cause was presented in compound with a novel cause, with the same outcome occurring following the compound and following the novel cause alone. With this novel extinction procedure, the inhibitory cues seemed more likely to lose their properties than the excitatory cues. In Experiment 2, we investigated blocking of excitatory and inhibitory causes and found similar blocking effects. Taken together, these results suggest that acquisition of excitation and inhibition is similar, but that inhibition is more liable to extinguish with our extinction procedure. In addition, we used a variable outcome, and this enabled us to test the predictions of an inferential reasoning account about what happens when the outcome level is at its minimum or maximum (De Houwer, Beckers, & Glautier, 2002). We discuss the predictions of this inferential account, Rescorla and Wagner’s (1972) model, and a connectionist model—the auto-associator.Irina Baetu & A. G. Bake
- …