First-line palliative HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is less effective after previous adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy

Background. Survival of patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has improved dramatically since trastuzumab has become available, although the disease eventually progresses in most patients. This study investigates the outcome (overall survival [OS] and time to next treatment [TNT]) in MBC patients pretreated with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting (TP-group) compared with trastuzumab-näive patients (TN-group) in order to investigate the possibility of trastuzumab resistance. Patients and Methods. Patients treated with first-line HER2-targeted- containing chemotherapy were eligible for the study. A power analysis was performed to estimate the minimum size of the TP-group. OS and TNT were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves andmultivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results. Between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2014, 469 patients were included, of whom 82 were in the TP-group and 387 were in the TN-group. Median OS and TNT were significantly worse in the TP-group compared with the TN-group (17 vs. 30 months, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.84 [1.15-2.96], p5.01 and 7 vs. 13 months, adjusted HR 1.65 [1.06-2.58], p5.03) after adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, diseasefree interval, hormone receptor status, metastatic site, and cytotoxic regimens. Conclusion. First-line trastuzumab-containing treatment regimens are less effective in patients with failure of adjuvant trastuzumab compared with trastuzumab-näive patients and might be due to trastuzumab resistance. The impact of trastuzumab resistance on the response on dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab and how resistance mechanisms can be used in the optimization of HER2-targeted treatment lines need further investigation.</p

SWITCH : A randomised, sequential, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer

Background Understanding how to sequence targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is important for maximisation of clinical benefit. Objectives To prospectively evaluate sequential use of the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib followed by sunitinib (So-Su) versus sunitinib followed by sorafenib (Su-So) in patients with mRCC. Design, setting, and participants The multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 SWITCH study assessed So-Su versus Su-So in patients with mRCC without prior systemic therapy, and stratified by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk score (favourable or intermediate). Intervention Patients were randomised to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily followed, on progression or intolerable toxicity, by sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 wk on, 2 wk off) (So-Su), or vice versa (Su-So). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoint was improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with So-Su versus Su-So, assessed from randomisation to progression or death during second-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Results and limitations In total, 365 patients were randomised (So-Su, n = 182; Su-So, n = 183). There was no significant difference in total PFS between So-Su and Su-So (median 12.5 vs 14.9 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–1.27; p = 0.5 for superiority). OS was similar for So-Su and Su-So (median 31.5 and 30.2 mo; HR 1.00, 90% CI 0.77–1.30; p = 0.5 for superiority). More So-Su patients than Su-So patients reached protocol-defined second-line therapy (57% vs 42%). Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar between the treatment arms. The most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent first-line adverse events were diarrhoea (54%) and hand-foot skin reaction (39%) for sorafenib; and diarrhoea (40%) and fatigue (40%) for sunitinib. Conclusions Total PFS was not superior with So-Su versus Su-So. These results demonstrate that sorafenib followed by sunitinib and vice versa provide similar clinical benefit in mRCC

HIV-2 uncoating images.

<p>(A) Images of empty vector-transfected HeLa cells infected with fluorescently labeled HIV-2. The infected cells were fixed at 1 hr after infection. HIV-2 capsids (CA) in cells were probed with Cy5 using anti-HIV-2 p26 antibodies. Fluorescent images of GFP-Vpx (Vpx, green), S15-Tomato (S15, red), HIV-2 p26 (p26, blue), a merged image of these three colors (Merge), a binary image of GFP-Vpx (Bi, green), and a merged image of Bi, S15, and p26 (Bi+S15+p26) are shown. In this image, we detected one particle with red, green, and blue three-fluorescent co-localization (thin arrow); 4 particles with green and blue two-fluorescent co-localization (one of them is indicated by a thick arrow); and nine particles with green fluorescent only (one of them is indicated by an arrow head). A bar shows 10 μm. (B) Images of HeLa cells stably expressing cynomolgus monkey TRIM5α following infection with fluorescently labeled HIV-2. Layout of the images is as described in the legend for panel A. In this image, we detected no particles with red, green, and blue co-localized fluorescence; two particles with green and blue co-localized fluorescence; and 13 particles with green fluorescence only.</p