Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion for Treating Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

BACKGROUND: Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common posterior decompression procedures used to treat multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). There is debate on their relative efficacy and safety for treatment of DCM. The goal of this study is to examine outcomes and costs of LF and LP procedures for DCM. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of adult patients ( RESULTS: LP cohort (n=76) and LF cohort (n=59) reported no difference in neck pain at baseline, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (p\u3e.05). Patients were successfully weaned off opioids at similar rates (LF: 88%, LP: 86%). Fixed and variable costs respectively with LF cases hospital were higher, 15.7% and 25.7% compared to LP cases (p=.03 and p CONCLUSIONS: When treating multilevel DCM, LP has similar rates of new or increasing axial neck pain compared to LF. LF was associated with greater hospital costs, length of stay, and complications compared to LP. LP may in fact be a less morbid and more cost-effective alternative to LF for patients without cervical deformity

Surgical Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Comparing Outcomes Between Patients Admitted Through Clinic vs Emergency Department

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) canlead to pain, disability, and permanentneurological impairment. Here, we comparedpatients who were admitted through clinic versus the emergency department (ED) for surgical management of DCM

A Comparison of Prognostic Models to Facilitate Surgical Decision Making for Patients with Spinal Metastatic Disease

Survival prognosis in an important factor to consider when implementing surgical treatment for metastatic spine disease. Several scoring systems have been developed to help providers predict survival and determine which patients with metastatic spine disease are candidates for surgery.Our primary aim was to determine predictors of 3-month, 6-month, and overall survivorship followingsurgery for metastatic spine disease.Our secondary aim was to identify the scoringsystem which most accurately predicts the short-term life expectancy of patients undergoingsurgery for metastatic spine lesions

A standardized protocol reduces opioid use and facilitates opioid cessation following anterior cervical spine surgery

Our study examined the effect of developing a reliable protocol for prescribing opioids for postoperative pain following ACS surgery. Our goal was to progress toward completion of an effective, research-based, and consistent opioid prescription protocol. This protocol proved to effectively reduce total MME administration. Long-term, we hope this study may assist in the development of opioid prescribing protocols for other orthopaedic procedures at UC Davis Medical Center

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treating multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.

BackgroundLaminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common posterior decompression procedures used to treat multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). There is debate on their relative efficacy and safety for treatment of DCM. The goal of this study is to examine outcomes and costs of LF and LP procedures for DCM.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of adult patients (<18) at a single center who underwent elective LP and LF of at least 3 levels from C3-C7. Outcome measures included operative characteristics, inpatient mobility status, length of stay, complications, revision surgery, VAS neck pain scores, and changes in radiographic alignment. Oral opioid analgesic needs and hospital cost comparison were also assessed.ResultsLP cohort (n=76) and LF cohort (n=59) reported no difference in neck pain at baseline, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (p>.05). Patients were successfully weaned off opioids at similar rates (LF: 88%, LP: 86%). Fixed and variable costs respectively with LF cases hospital were higher, 15.7% and 25.7% compared to LP cases (p=.03 and p<.001). LF has a longer length of stay (4.2 vs. 3.1 days, p=.001). Wound-related complications were 5 times more likely after LF (13.6% vs. 5.9%, RR: 5.15) and C5 palsy rates were similar across the groups (LF: 11.9% LP: 5.6% RR: 1.8). Ground-level falls requiring an emergency department visit were more likely after LF (11.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.04).ConclusionsWhen treating multilevel DCM, LP has similar rates of new or increasing axial neck pain compared to LF. LF was associated with greater hospital costs, length of stay, and complications compared to LP. LP may in fact be a less morbid and more cost-effective alternative to LF for patients without cervical deformity

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treating multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy

Background: Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common posterior decompression procedures used to treat multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). There is debate on their relative efficacy and safety for treatment of DCM. The goal of this study is to examine outcomes and costs of LF and LP procedures for DCM. Methods: This is a retrospective review of adult patients (.05). Patients were successfully weaned off opioids at similar rates (LF: 88%, LP: 86%). Fixed and variable costs respectively with LF cases hospital were higher, 15.7% and 25.7% compared to LP cases (p=.03 and p<.001). LF has a longer length of stay (4.2 vs. 3.1 days, p=.001). Wound-related complications were 5 times more likely after LF (13.6% vs. 5.9%, RR: 5.15) and C5 palsy rates were similar across the groups (LF: 11.9% LP: 5.6% RR: 1.8). Ground-level falls requiring an emergency department visit were more likely after LF (11.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.04). Conclusions: When treating multilevel DCM, LP has similar rates of new or increasing axial neck pain compared to LF. LF was associated with greater hospital costs, length of stay, and complications compared to LP. LP may in fact be a less morbid and more cost-effective alternative to LF for patients without cervical deformity