Do tasks make a difference? Accounting for heterogeneity of performance of children with reading difficulties on tasks of executive function : findings from a meta-analysis

Research studies have implicated executive functions in reading difficulties (RD). But while some studies have found children with RD to be impaired on tasks of executive function other studies report unimpaired performance. A meta-analysis was carried out to determine whether these discrepant findings can be accounted for by differences in the tasks of executive function that are utilized. A total of 48 studies comparing the performance on tasks of executive function of children with RD with their typically developing peers were included in the meta-analysis, yielding 180 effect sizes. An overall effect size of 0.57 (SE .03) was obtained, indicating that children with RD have impairments on tasks of executive function. However, effect sizes varied considerably suggesting that the impairment is not uniform. Moderator analysis revealed that task modality and IQ-achievement discrepancy definitions of RD influenced the magnitude of effect; however, the age and gender of participants and the nature of the RD did not have an influence. While the children's RD were associated with executive function impairments, variation in effect size is a product of the assessment task employed, underlying task demands, and definitional criteria

Bulletin 78 - Material on Geography which may be obtained for free or at small cost

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1175/thumbnail.jp

Bulletin 73 - List of Books for the First Six Grades

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1172/thumbnail.jp

Bulletin 50 - Lists of Materials that may be obtained free or at small cost

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1150/thumbnail.jp

Bulletin 81 - Material on Geography which may be obtained for free or at small cost

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1178/thumbnail.jp

Bulletin 54 - Material on Geography which may be obtained free or at small cost (Revised)

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1154/thumbnail.jp

Bulletin 69 - Materials on Geography which may be obtained free or at small cost

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1168/thumbnail.jp

Bulletin 46 - Material on Geography which may be obtained free or at small cost

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/1146/thumbnail.jp

A cross-sectional pilot study of the Scottish early development instrument : a tool for addressing inequality

Early childhood is recognised as a key developmental phase with implications for social, academic, health and wellbeing outcomes in later childhood and indeed throughout the adult lifespan. Community level data on inequalities in early child development are therefore required to establish the impact of government early years' policies and programmes on children's strengths and vulnerabilities at local and national level. This would allow local leaders to target tailored interventions according to community needs to improve children's readiness for the transition to school. The challenge is collecting valid data on sufficient samples of children entering school to derive robust inferences about each local birth cohort's developmental status. This information needs to be presented in a way that allows community stakeholders to understand the results, expediting the improvement of preschool programming to improve future cohorts' development in the early years. The aim of the study was to carry out a pilot to test the feasibility and ease of use in Scotland of the 104-item teacher-administered Early Development Instrument, an internationally validated measure of children's global development at school entry developed in Canada. Phase 1 was piloted in an education district with 14 Primary 1 teachers assessing a cohort of 154 children, following which the instrument was adapted for the Scottish context (Scottish Early Development Instrument: SEDI). Phase 2 was then carried out using the SEDI. Data were analysed from a larger sample of 1090 participants, comprising all Primary 1 children within this school district, evaluated by 68 teachers. The SEDI displayed adequate psychometric and discriminatory properties and is appropriate for use across Scotland without any further modifications. Children in the lowest socioeconomic status quintiles were 2-3 times more likely than children in the most affluent quintile to score low in at least one developmental domain. Even in the most affluent quintile though, 17% of children were 'developmentally vulnerable', suggesting that those in need cannot be identified by socioeconomic status alone. The SEDI offers a feasible means of providing communities with a holistic overview of school readiness for targeting early years' interventions