Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer in the Netherlands

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer in the Netherlands P.E.R. Spronk1, A.C.M. Van Bommel1, S. Siesling2,3, M.J.T. Baas- Vrancken Peeters4, C.H. Smorenburg5. 1Leiden University Medical Centre, Surgery, Leiden, Netherlands; 2Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands IKNL, Epidemiology, Utrecht, Netherlands; 3University of Twente, MIRA Biomedical science and Technical Medicine, Twente, Netherlands; 4Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 5Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The aim of this study is to examine the use of NAC for LABC in all Dutch hospitals participating in breast cancer care and to assess what patient, tumour and hospital characteristics influence its use. Material and Methods: Data were derived from the national multidisciplinary NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), regarding all women aged >18 years and newly diagnosed with LABC from January 2011 to September 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between the use of NAC and patient, tumour and hospital related factors. Results: Of 1419 woman diagnosed with LABC, 70% were treated with NAC. This percentage varied from 12.5% to 90% between hospitals and did not increase over time. Factors associated with the use of NAC included young age, large tumour size, more advanced nodal disease and triple negative or hormone-receptor negative tumours. Also patients treated in hospitals with a multidisciplinary preoperative work-up and participation in neoadjuvant studies were more likely to receive NAC. However, considerable variation between hospitals remained after casemix correction. Table 1. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) for receipt of NAC among 1419 stage III patients 2011 through 2013 OR 95% CI P-value Age 0.000 5 cm 5.68 2.34−13.79 Clinical nodal status 0.000 cNx/N0 ref. cN1 1.32 0.86−2.04 cN2 2.93 1.18−7.29 cN3 10.28 4.18−25.25 Receptor status 0.000 Triple negative 2.35 1.40−3.93 HR−, Her2+ 3.37 1.67−6.78 HR+, Her2+ 0.91 0.51−1.60 HR+, Her2− ref. Type of surgery 0.026 Breast conservation therapy 2.05 1.09−3.84 Mastectomy ref. Multidisciplinary team 0.021 Yes 1.98 1.11−3.53 No ref. Type of hospital 0.569 General 1.20 0.73−1.98 Top clinical ref. Academic 1.50 0.64−3.47 Hospital surgical volume 0.729 200 1.27 0.70−2.31 Study participation 0.005 Yes 1.80 1.20−2.70 No ref. Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the use of NAC for LABC in the Netherlands. Although various patient, tumor and institutional factors are associated with the use of NAC in LABC, these can only explain part of the observed variation in treatment patterns between hospitals

The National Dutch Breast Implant Registry: user-reported experiences and importance

Background: Robust (inter-)national breast implant registries are important. For some, registries are an administrative burden, for others they represent a solution for the discussions involving breast implants. The DBIR is one of the first national, opt-out, clinical registries of breast implants, providing information for clinical auditing and product recall. Four years after its introduction, it is time to address users’ comments in order to keep improving quality of registration, and patient safety. This study assesses users’ feedback focusing on importance of registration, logistics and user experience, and areas of improvement. Methods: In May 2018, a standardized online study–specific questionnaire was sent out to all members of the Netherlands Society of Plastic Surgery. Descriptive statistics were reported in absolute frequencies and/or percentages. Results: A total of 102 members responded to the questionnaire (response rate, 24.2%). Of all respondents, 97.1% were actively registering in DBIR. Respondents rated the importance of registration in DBIR as 8.1 out of 10 points. Ninety-one respondents suggested improvements for the DBIR. All comments were related to registration convenience and provision of automatically generated data. Conclusions: Respondents believe that registration is highly important and worth the administrative burden. However, we should collectively keep improving accuracy, usability and sustainability of breast

Optimizing breast reconstructive surgery in the Netherlands using clinical audit data

Over a century ago, the systematic evaluation of medical treatment outcomes was first described by Ernest Codman. At that time a too progressive thought, while the value of measuring the quality of care is seen nowadays.The NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) provides insight into the various care processes that are part of the complex multidisciplinary treatment of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Results of the NBCA show a good and still improving quality of care for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. In addition, this thesis provides insight into a sub-area where variation between hospitals is found; the performance of an immediate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing mastectomy. Many factors influence this hospital variation, such as patient and tumour factors, hospital factors and differences in indications for immediate breast reconstruction between surgeons and plastic surgeons. Physicians should inform patients about the various breast cancer treatment options. Informing a patient about immediate breast reconstruction results in a 14 times higher chance of actually undergoing a breast reconstruction after mastectomy.These factors should to be evaluated and improved as quality of life is higher for patients with immediate breast reconstruction than with mastectomy alone. By continuously measuring, providing feedback and acting on the data found at both a national level and in the consultation room, Ernest Codman's heritage will certainly be realized.</p

Optimizing breast reconstructive surgery in the Netherlands using clinical audit data

Over a century ago, the systematic evaluation of medical treatment outcomes was first described by Ernest Codman. At that time a too progressive thought, while the value of measuring the quality of care is seen nowadays.The NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) provides insight into the various care processes that are part of the complex multidisciplinary treatment of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Results of the NBCA show a good and still improving quality of care for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. In addition, this thesis provides insight into a sub-area where variation between hospitals is found; the performance of an immediate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing mastectomy. Many factors influence this hospital variation, such as patient and tumour factors, hospital factors and differences in indications for immediate breast reconstruction between surgeons and plastic surgeons. Physicians should inform patients about the various breast cancer treatment options. Informing a patient about immediate breast reconstruction results in a 14 times higher chance of actually undergoing a breast reconstruction after mastectomy.These factors should to be evaluated and improved as quality of life is higher for patients with immediate breast reconstruction than with mastectomy alone. By continuously measuring, providing feedback and acting on the data found at both a national level and in the consultation room, Ernest Codman's heritage will certainly be realized.</p

Optimizing breast reconstructive surgery in the Netherlands using clinical audit data

Over a century ago, the systematic evaluation of medical treatment outcomes was first described by Ernest Codman. At that time a too progressive thought, while the value of measuring the quality of care is seen nowadays.The NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) provides insight into the various care processes that are part of the complex multidisciplinary treatment of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Results of the NBCA show a good and still improving quality of care for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. In addition, this thesis provides insight into a sub-area where variation between hospitals is found; the performance of an immediate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing mastectomy. Many factors influence this hospital variation, such as patient and tumour factors, hospital factors and differences in indications for immediate breast reconstruction between surgeons and plastic surgeons. Physicians should inform patients about the various breast cancer treatment options. Informing a patient about immediate breast reconstruction results in a 14 times higher chance of actually undergoing a breast reconstruction after mastectomy.These factors should to be evaluated and improved as quality of life is higher for patients with immediate breast reconstruction than with mastectomy alone. By continuously measuring, providing feedback and acting on the data found at both a national level and in the consultation room, Ernest Codman's heritage will certainly be realized.LUMC / Geneeskund

A review of prognostic factors in early-stage carcinoma of the cervix (FIGO I B and II A) and implications for treatment strategy

Several prognostic factors in stages I B and II A cervical carcinoma have been widely studied to define groups of patients with a poor prognosis. Most of these factors are interrelated. The characteristics which should be regarded as main factors have not yet been defined, because the studies reported were based on mainly retrospective and non-randomized analysis. Reviewing the literature, lymph node metastasis, differentiation grade, tumor size, parametrial extension, lymphblood vessel invasion and cervical invasion seem to be prognostically important factors, which suggests that the subdivision of patients according to the FIGO classification alone is inaccurate. It seems useful to define subgroups of patients according to tumor characteristics, determined after surgical treatment and accurate histologic examination of the surgical specimen. Patients with one or more of these tumor features need additional treatment to improve survival. The current treatment modalities, such as postoperative radiotherapy, have not been thoroughly evaluated, but doubt exists as to their efficacy. Data in the literature suggest that particularly patients with para-aortic or multiple pelvic lymph node metastasis (> 3) have already developed distant metastases at the time of primary treatment and therefore need adjuvant systemic therapy. Patients with tumors larger than 4 cm in diameter, differentiation grade III, lymph-blood vessel invasion or cervical invasion (of more than 70%) seem to have high recurrence rates at both pelvic and distant sites, indicating that there is also a need for better pelvic control

Reducing Healthcare Costs Facilitated by Surgical Auditing: A Systematic Review

Surgical oncolog

The additional cancer yield of clinical breast examination in screening of women at hereditary increased risk of breast cancer: a systematic review

Surgical oncolog