Methods to discover and validate biofluid-based biomarkers in neurodegenerative dementias

Neurodegenerative dementias are progressive diseases that cause neuronal network breakdown in different brain regions often because of accumulation of misfolded proteins in the brain extracellular matrix, such as amyloids, or inside neurons or other cell types of the brain. Several diagnostic protein biomarkers in body fluids are being used and implemented, such as for Alzheimer's disease. However, there is still a lack of biomarkers for co-pathologies and other causes of dementia. Such biofluid-based biomarkers enable precision medicine approaches for diagnosis and treatment, allow to learn more about underlying disease processes, and facilitate the development of patient inclusion and evaluation tools in clinical trials. When designing studies to discover novel biofluid-based biomarkers, choice of technology is an important starting point. But there are so many technologies to choose among. To address this, we here review the technologies that are currently available in research settings and, in some cases, in clinical laboratory practice. This presents a form of lexicon on each technology addressing its use in research and clinics, its strengths and limitations, and a future perspective

Methods to discover and validate biofluid-based biomarkers in neurodegenerative dementias

Neurodegenerative dementias are progressive diseases that cause neuronal network breakdown in different brain regions often because of accumulation of misfolded proteins in the brain extracellular matrix, such as amyloids or inside neurons or other cell types of the brain. Several diagnostic protein biomarkers in body fluids are being used and implemented, such as for Alzheimer\xe2\x80\x99s disease. However, there is still a lack of biomarkers for co-pathologies and other causes of dementia. Such biofluid-based biomarkers enable precision medicine approaches for diagnosis and treatment, allow to learn more about underlying disease processes, and facilitate the development of patient inclusion and evaluation tools in clinical trials. When designing studies to discover novel biofluid-based biomarkers, choice of technology is an important starting point. But there are so many technologies to choose among. To address this, we here review the technologies that are currently available in research settings and, in some cases, in clinical laboratory practice. This presents a form of lexicon on each technology addressing its use in research and clinics, its strengths and limitations, and a future perspective

Methods to Discover and Validate Biofluid-Based Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Dementias

Neurodegenerative dementias are progressive diseases that cause neuronal network breakdown in different brain regions often because of accumulation of misfolded proteins in the brain extracellular matrix, such as amyloids or inside neurons or other cell types of the brain. Several diagnostic protein biomarkers in body fluids are being used and implemented, such as for Alzheimer’s disease. However, there is still a lack of biomarkers for co-pathologies and other causes of dementia. Such biofluidbased biomarkers enable precision medicine approaches for diagnosis and treatment, allow to learn more about underlying disease processes, and facilitate the development of patient inclusion and evaluation tools in clinical trials. When designing studies to discover novel biofluidbased biomarkers, choice of technology is an important starting point. But there are so many technologies to choose among. To address this, we here review the technologies that are currently available in research settings and, in some cases, in clinical laboratory practice. This presents a form of lexicon on each technology addressing its use in research and clinics, its strengths and limitations, and a future perspective

Thimet oligopeptidase as a potential CSF biomarker for Alzheimer's disease : A cross-platform validation study

Our previous antibody-based cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics study showed that Thimet oligopeptidase (THOP1), an amyloid beta (Aβ) neuropeptidase, was increased in mild cognitive impairment with amyloid pathology (MCI-Aβ+) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia compared with controls and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), highlighting the potential of CSF THOP1 as an early specific biomarker for AD. We aimed to develop THOP1 immunoassays for large-scale analysis and validate our proteomics findings in two independent cohorts. We developed in-house CSF THOP1 immunoassays on automated Ella and Simoa platforms. The performance of the different assays were compared using Passing-Bablok regression analysis in a subset of CSF samples from the discovery cohort (n = 72). Clinical validation was performed in two independent cohorts (cohort 1: n = 200; cohort 2: n = 165) using the Ella platform. THOP1 concentrations moderately correlated between proteomics analysis and our novel assays (Rho > 0.580). In both validation cohorts, CSF THOP1 was increased in MCI-Aβ+ (>1.3-fold) and AD (>1.2-fold) compared with controls; and between MCI-Aβ+ and DLB (>1.2-fold). Higher THOP1 concentrations were detected in AD compared with DLB only when both cohorts were analyzed together. In both cohorts, THOP1 correlated with CSF total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau), and Aβ40 (Rho > 0.540) but not Aβ42. Validation of our proteomics findings underpins the potential of CSF THOP1 as an early specific biomarker associated with AD pathology. The use of antibody-based platforms in both the discovery and validation phases facilitated the translation of proteomics findings, providing an additional workflow that may accelerate the development of biofluid-based biomarkers

Caregivers’ attitudes toward blood‐based biomarker testing for Alzheimer's disease

Abstract INTRODUCTION We aimed to evaluate informal caregivers’ attitudes toward undergoing and future implementation of blood‐based biomarkers (BBBM) testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS We explored caregivers’ perspectives, by combining an online survey (n = 107) with a subsequent focus group (n = 7). We used descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis to identify common themes in answers to open‐ended survey questions and focus group data. RESULTS Most caregivers (72.0%) favored BBBM for AD diagnosis. Provided with hypothetical scenarios, confidence in a normal result decreased significantly if experienced symptoms were more severe (mild: 78.5% vs. severe: 48.6%). Caregivers’ attitudes toward BBBM for screening purposes significantly improved with prospect of treatment (53.3% vs. 92.5%). Concerns toward BBBM testing included treatment unavailability, increased/prolonged distress, and AD‐related stigma. Potential benefits were actionability, explanation for symptoms, and opportunities for better care and future treatment. DISCUSSION Emerging AD treatment and reduction of AD‐related stigma could profoundly increase public interest in BBBM testing for AD. Highlights Most informal caregivers would want blood‐based biomarker (BBBM) testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. Perceived (dis)advantages were related to diagnosing AD early. With severe symptoms, there was less confidence in normal BBBM results. Treatment availability would significantly increase interest in BBBM testing for AD. Informal caregivers showed uncertainty regarding the meaning of the term “AD.

Thimet oligopeptidase as a potential CSF biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: A cross‐platform validation study

Abstract INTRODUCTION Our previous antibody‐based cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics study showed that Thimet oligopeptidase (THOP1), an amyloid beta (Aβ) neuropeptidase, was increased in mild cognitive impairment with amyloid pathology (MCI‐Aβ+) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia compared with controls and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), highlighting the potential of CSF THOP1 as an early specific biomarker for AD. We aimed to develop THOP1 immunoassays for large‐scale analysis and validate our proteomics findings in two independent cohorts. METHODS We developed in‐house CSF THOP1 immunoassays on automated Ella and Simoa platforms. The performance of the different assays were compared using Passing–Bablok regression analysis in a subset of CSF samples from the discovery cohort (n = 72). Clinical validation was performed in two independent cohorts (cohort 1: n = 200; cohort 2: n = 165) using the Ella platform. RESULTS THOP1 concentrations moderately correlated between proteomics analysis and our novel assays (Rho > 0.580). In both validation cohorts, CSF THOP1 was increased in MCI‐Aβ+ (>1.3‐fold) and AD (>1.2‐fold) compared with controls; and between MCI‐Aβ+ and DLB (>1.2‐fold). Higher THOP1 concentrations were detected in AD compared with DLB only when both cohorts were analyzed together. In both cohorts, THOP1 correlated with CSF total tau (t‐tau), phosphorylated tau (p‐tau), and Aβ40 (Rho > 0.540) but not Aβ42. DISCUSSION Validation of our proteomics findings underpins the potential of CSF THOP1 as an early specific biomarker associated with AD pathology. The use of antibody‐based platforms in both the discovery and validation phases facilitated the translation of proteomics findings, providing an additional workflow that may accelerate the development of biofluid‐based biomarkers

A Combination of Neurofilament Light, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Neuronal Pentraxin-2 Discriminates Between Frontotemporal Dementia and Other Dementias

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still a challenging task due to its symptomatic overlap with other neurological diseases and the lack of biofluid-based biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic potential of a combination of novel biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. METHODS: We included 135 patients from the Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, with the diagnoses FTD (n = 37), mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD, n = 47), Lewy body dementia (PDD/DLB, n = 22), and cognitively unimpaired patients as controls (OND, n = 29). Biomarker levels of neuronal pentraxin-2 (NPTX2), neuronal pentraxin receptor, neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured in CSF, as well as NfL and GFAP in serum. We assessed biomarker differences by analysis of covariance and generalized linear models (GLM). We performed receiver operating characteristics analyses and Spearman correlation to determine biomarker associations. RESULTS: CSF NPTX2 and serum GFAP levels varied most between diagnostic groups. The combination of CSF NPTX2, serum NfL and serum GFAP differentiated FTD from the other groups with good accuracy (FTD versus MCI-AD: area under the curve (AUC) [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.81-0.96]; FTD versus PDD/DLB: AUC = 0.82 [0.71-0.93]; FTD versus OND: AUC = 0.80 [0.70-0.91]). CSF NPTX2 and serum GFAP correlated positively only in PDD/DLB (ρ= 0.56, p < 0.05). NPTX2 and serum NfL did not correlate in any of the diagnostic groups. Serum GFAP and serum NfL correlated positively in all groups (ρ= 0.47-0.74, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We show the combined potential of CSF NPTX2, serum NfL, and serum GFAP to differentiate FTD from other neurodegenerative disorders