21 research outputs found

    Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil: setting the baseline knowledge on the animal diversity in Brazil

    Get PDF
    The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others

    The gender pay gap in university student employment

    No full text
    Gender pay gaps are commonly studied in populations with already completed educational careers. We focus on an earlier stage by investigating the gender pay gap among university students working alongside their studies. With data from five cohorts of a large-scale student survey from Germany, we use regression and wage decomposition techniques to describe gender pay gaps and potential explanations. We find that female students earn about 6% less on average than male students, which reduces to 4.1% when accounting for a rich set of explanatory variables. The largest explanatory factor is the type of jobs male and female students pursue

    The gender pay gap in university student employment

    No full text
    Gender pay gaps are commonly studied in populations with already completed educational careers. We focus on an earlier stage by investigating the gender pay gap among university students working alongside their studies. With data from five cohorts of a large-scale student survey from Germany, we use regression and wage decomposition techniques to describe gender pay gaps and potential explanations. We find that female students earn about 6% less on average than male students, which reduces to 4.1% when accounting for a rich set of explanatory variables. The largest explanatory factor is the type of jobs male and female students pursue. Introductio

    Die Lohnlücke zwischen Frauen und Männern besteht bereits vor Abschluss des Studiums

    No full text
    Die Lohnlücke zwischen Frauen und Männern (der sogenannte Gender Pay Gap) wird üblicherweise in Bevölkerungsgruppen untersucht, die ihre Bildungslaufbahn bereits abgeschlossen haben. In diesem Beitrag betrachten wir eine frühere Phase der Berufstätigkeit, indem wir den Gender Pay Gap unter Studierenden, die neben ihrem Studium arbeiten, analysieren. Anhand von Daten aus fünf Kohorten einer Studierendenbefragung in Deutschland beschreiben wir den Gender Pay Gap und diskutieren mögliche Erklärungen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Studentinnen im Durchschnitt etwa 6% weniger verdienen als Studenten. Nach Berücksichtigung verschiedener entlohnungsrelevanter Faktoren verringert sich die Lücke auf 4,1%. Einer der Hauptgründe für die Differenz in der Entlohnung sind die unterschiedlichen Beschäftigungen, die männliche und weibliche Studierende ausüben

    Cyberangriffe gegen Unternehmen in Deutschland

    Get PDF
    CYBERANGRIFFE GEGEN UNTERNEHMEN IN DEUTSCHLAND Cyberangriffe gegen Unternehmen in Deutschland / Dreißigacker, Arne (Rights reserved) ( -

    Understanding the adoption of cyber insurance for residual risks - An empirical large-scale survey on organizational factors of the demand side

    No full text
    This research paper analyzes technological, organizational, and environmental (TOE framework) adoption factors of cyber insurances (CI) by conducting a computer-assisted telephone interview study with 2,483 German firms. Considering our screening of related literature, this study, to our knowledge, is the first large-scale empirical study analyzing organizational adoption factors of CI on the demand side. We distinguish between firms that have or have not considered CI and those that have or have not adopted CI following considerations. Our regression results indicate that there are statistically significant factors on the consideration and adoption of CI across all TOE dimensions. Subsequently, we discuss the extent to which CI is perceived as an appropriate tool to manage information security and derive propositions for the education of firms and further research in academia
    corecore