Current clinical practice and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: analysis of individual data from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is frequently used in patients with early breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar survival after NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). However, certain subtypes may benefit more when NACT contains regimes leading to high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. In this study we analyzed data using the OncoBox research from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers to describe the current clinical practice of and outcomes after NACT under routine conditions. These data were compared to patients treated with ACT. 40% of all patients received chemotherapy. The use of NACT increased over time from 5% in 2007 up to 17.3% in 2016. The proportion of patients receiving NACT varied by subtype. It was low in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (5.8%). However, 31.8% of patients with triple-negative, 31.9% with HR-negative/HER2-positive, and 26.5% with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer received NACT. The rates of pCR were higher in patients with HR-positive/HER2-positive, HR negative/HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors (36, 53 and 38%) compared to HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors (12%). PCR was achieved more often in HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors over time. This is the largest study on use and effects of NACT in German breast cancer centers. It demonstrates the increased use of NACT based on recommendations in current clinical guidelines. An improvement of pCR was shown in particular in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, which is consistent with data from randomized controlled trails

Measuring the accuracy of propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) before and after surgery with major blood loss

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) is based on pharmacokinetic models designed to achieve a desired drug level in the blood. TCI's predictive accuracy of plasma propofol levels at the end of surgery with major blood loss has not been well established. This prospective observational study included adult patients (BMI 20-35 kg/m2) undergoing surgery with expected blood loss ≥ 1500 mL. The study was conducted with the Schnider TCI propofol model (Alaris PK Infusion Pump, CareFusion, Switzerland). Propofol levels were assessed in steady-state at the end of anaesthesia induction (Tinitial) and before the end of surgery (Tfinal). Predicted propofol levels (CTCI) were compared to measured levels (Cblood). Twenty-one patients were included. The median estimated blood loss was 1600 mL (IQR 1000-2300), and the median fluid balance at Tfinal was + 3200 mL (IQR 2320-4715). Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and blood lactate did not differ significantly between Tinitial and Tfinal. The median bispectral index (0-100) was 50 (IQR 42-54) and 49 (IQR 42-56) at the two respective time points. At Tinitial, median CTCI was 2.2 µmol/L (IQR 2-2.45) and Cblood was 2.0 µmol/L (bias 0.3 µmol/L, limits of agreement - 1.1 to 1.3, p = 0.33). CTCI and Cblood at Tfinal were 2.0 µmol/L (IQR 1.6-2.2) and 1 µmol/L (IQR 0.8-1.4), respectively (bias 0.6 µmol/L, limits of agreement - 0.89 to 1.4, p < 0.0001). Propofol TCI allows clinically unproblematic conduct of general anaesthesia. In cases of major blood loss, the probability of propofol TCI overestimating plasma levels increases.Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; DRKS00009312)