112 research outputs found

    Polygenic Risk for Major Depression Interacts with Parental Criticism in Predicting Adolescent Depressive Symptom Development

    Get PDF
    Research has focused more and more on the interplay between genetics and environment in predicting different forms of psychopathology, including depressive symptoms. While the polygenic nature of depressive symptoms is increasingly recognized, only few studies have applied a polygenic approach in gene-by-environment interaction (G × E) studies. Furthermore, longitudinal G × E studies on developmental psychopathological properties of depression are scarce. Therefore, this 6-year longitudinal community study examined the interaction between genetic risk for major depression and a multi-informant longitudinal index of critical parenting in relation to depressive symptom development from early to late adolescence. The sample consisted of 327 Dutch adolescents of European descent (56% boys; Mage T1 = 13.00, SDage T1 = 0.44). Polygenic risk for major depression was based on the Hyde et al. (Nature Genetics, 48, 1031–1036, 2016) meta-analysis and genetic sensitivity analyses were based on the 23andMe discovery dataset. Latent Growth Models suggested that polygenic risk score for major depression was associated with higher depressive symptoms across adolescence (significant main effect), particularly for those experiencing elevated levels of critical parenting (significant G × E). These findings highlight how polygenic risk for major depression in combination with a general environmental factor impacts depressive symptom development from early to late adolescence

    Associations between genetic liabilities to smoking behavior and schizophrenia symptoms in patients with a psychotic disorder, their siblings and healthy controls

    Get PDF
    It is unknown how smoking behavior polygenic scores (PRS) relate to psychosis and psychotic symptoms. To elucidate this, genotype and phenotype data were collected from patients with schizophrenia, their unaffected siblings, and healthy controls in a six-year follow-up prospective cohort study. Associations between smoking behaviors, PRS and schizophrenia symptoms were explored using linear mixed-effect models. The mean number of cigarettes smoked per day were 18 for patients, 13 for siblings and 12 for controls. In the overall sample, PRSs-smoking initiation (i.e., ever smoking as a binary phenotype, PRS-SI) were positively associated with positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and depressive symptoms, whereas PRSs-AI (age at regular smoking initiation) were negatively associated with all symptom dimensions, with similar effect sizes. When considering groups separately, PRS were only associated with psychotic symptoms in siblings and controls. In conclusion, unaffected siblings show smoking behaviors at an intermediate level between patients and healthy controls. Additionally, PRS-SI and PRS-AI are associated with all symptom dimensions only in unaffected siblings and healthy controls, possibly owing to the dominant role of other (genetic) risk factors in patients. Future studies may examine mechanisms via which genetic risk for smoking affects mental health symptoms.</p

    Phenome-wide and genome-wide analyses of quality of life in schizophrenia

    Get PDF
    This article has been published in a revised form in BJPsych Open [http://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.140]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © copyright holder.Background Schizophrenia negatively affects quality of life (QoL). A handful of variables from small studies have been reported to influence QoL in patients with schizophrenia, but a study comprehensively dissecting the genetic and non-genetic contributing factors to QoL in these patients is currently lacking. Aims We adopted a hypothesis-generating approach to assess the phenotypic and genotypic determinants of QoL in schizophrenia. Method The study population comprised 1119 patients with a psychotic disorder, 1979 relatives and 586 healthy controls. Using linear regression, we tested >100 independent demographic, cognitive and clinical phenotypes for their association with QoL in patients. We then performed genome-wide association analyses of QoL and examined the association between polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and subjective well-being and QoL. Results We found nine phenotypes to be significantly and independently associated with QoL in patients, the most significant ones being negative (β = −1.17; s.e. 0.05; P = 1 × 10–83; r2 = 38%), depressive (β = −1.07; s.e. 0.05; P = 2 × 10–79; r2 = 36%) and emotional distress (β = −0.09; s.e. 0.01; P = 4 × 10–59, r2 = 25%) symptoms. Schizophrenia and subjective well-being polygenic risk scores, using various P-value thresholds, were significantly and consistently associated with QoL (lowest association P-value = 6.8 × 10–6). Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the results. Conclusions Various clinical phenotypes of schizophrenia, as well as schizophrenia and subjective well-being polygenic risk scores, are associated with QoL in patients with schizophrenia and their relatives. These may be targeted by clinicians to more easily identify vulnerable patients with schizophrenia for further social and clinical interventions to improve their QoL.Dutch Health Research Council; Lundbeck; AstraZeneca; Eli Lilly; Janssen Cilag;Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre of the Academic Medical Center and the mental health institutions at Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg (GGZ) Ingeest; Arkin; Dijk en Duin; GGZ Rivierduinen; Erasmus Medical Centre and GGZ Noord Holland Noord; Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen and the mental health institutions at Lentis; GGZ Friesland; GGZ Drenthe; Dimence; Mediant; GGNet Warnsveld; Yulius Dordrecht and Parnassia Psycho-Medical Center The Hague; Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Centre and the mental health institutions at GGZ Eindhoven en De Kempen; GGZ Breburg; GGZ Oost-Brabant; Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid; Mondriaan; Virenze riagg; Zuyderland GGZ; MET ggz; Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg; Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute University of Antwerp; Psychiatrisch Centrum Ziekeren Sint-Truiden; Psychiatrisch Ziekenhuis Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden; GGZ Overpelt and Openbaar Psychiatrisch Zorgcentrum Rekem; Utrecht: University Medical Center Utrecht and the mental health institutions Altrecht; GGZ Centraal and Delt

    Interrogating Associations Between Polygenic Liabilities and Electroconvulsive Therapy Effectiveness

    Get PDF
    Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for severe major depressive episodes (MDEs). Nonetheless, firmly established associations between ECT outcomes and biological variables are currently lacking. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) carry clinical potential, but associations with treatment response in psychiatry are seldom reported. Here, we examined whether PRSs for major depressive disorder, schizophrenia (SCZ), cross-disorder, and pharmacological antidepressant response are associated with ECT effectiveness. Methods: A total of 288 patients with MDE from 3 countries were included. The main outcome was a change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores from before to after ECT treatment. Secondary outcomes were response and remission. Regression analyses with PRSs as independent variables and several covariates were performed. Explained variance (R 2) at the optimal p-value threshold is reported. Results: In the 266 subjects passing quality control, the PRS-SCZ was positively associated with a larger Hamilton Depression Rating Scale decrease in linear regression (optimal p-value threshold = .05, R 2 = 6.94%, p < .0001), which was consistent across countries: Ireland (R 2 = 8.18%, p = .0013), Belgium (R 2 = 6.83%, p = .016), and the Netherlands (R 2 = 7.92%, p = .0077). The PRS-SCZ was also positively associated with remission (R 2 = 4.63%, p = .0018). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, including in MDE without psychotic features (R 2 = 4.42%, p = .0024) and unipolar MDE only (R 2 = 9.08%, p < .0001), confirmed the results. The other PRSs were not associated with a change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score at the predefined Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold. Conclusions: A linear association between PRS-SCZ and ECT outcome was uncovered. Although it is too early to adopt PRSs in ECT clinical decision making, these findings strengthen the positioning of PRS-SCZ as relevant to treatment response in psychiatry

    Gene–environment interaction study on the polygenic risk score for neuroticism, childhood adversity, and parental bonding

    Get PDF
    The present study examines whether neuroticism is predicted by genetic vulnerability, summarized as polygenic risk score for neuroticism (PRSN), in interaction with bullying, parental bonding, and childhood adversity. Data were derived from a general population adolescent and young adult twin cohort. The final sample consisted of 202 monozygotic and 436 dizygotic twins and 319 twin pairs. The Short Eysenck Personality questionnaire was used to measure neuroticism. PRSN was trained on the results from the Genetics of Personality Consortium (GPC) and United Kingdom Biobank (UKB) cohorts, yielding two different PRSN. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the main and interacting associations of PRSN, childhood adversity, bullying, and parental bonding style with neuroticism. We found no evidence of gene–environment correlation. PRSN thresholds of .005 and .2 were chosen, based on GPC and UKB datasets, respectively. After correction for confounders, all the individual variables were associated with the expression of neuroticism: both PRSN from GPC and UKB, childhood adversity, maternal bonding, paternal bonding, and bullying in primary school and secondary school. However, the results indicated no evidence for gene–environment interaction in this cohort. These results suggest that genetic vulnerability on the one hand and negative life events (childhood adversity and bullying) and positive life events (optimal parental bonding) on the other represent noninteracting pathways to neuroticism
    • …
    corecore