Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device

The intrauterine device (IUD), primarily in the form of the copper IUD, is used by more than 150 million women around the world, making it the most widely used reversible method of contraception. With a remarkably low failure rate of less than 1 per 100 women in the first year of use, the Copper T-380A is in the top tier of contraceptives in terms of efficacy. Risks of utilization include perforation and an increased risk of infection in the first 20 days following insertion. Overall, the number of adverse events is low, making the Copper T-380A a very safe contraceptive method. The most common reasons for the discontinuation of this method are menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea. However, cumulative discontinuation rates of Copper T-380A are lower than that have been reported for other methods, indicating that the Copper T-380A is highly acceptable to women. After 5 years, approximately 50% of all women, who have a Copper T-380A inserted, will continue to use this highly effective contraceptive method

Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Postpartum Adolescents: A Randomized Pilot Study.

This pilot study assessed the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial comparing the proportion of adolescents using a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG IUD) at six months postpartum when it is inserted immediately after vaginal delivery (within 10 minutes after placental expulsion) compared to insertion four to six weeks postpartum. Pregnant adolescents (14 to 19 years) who desired a LNG IUD for postpartum contraception were randomized to insertion of the LNG IUD either within 10 minutes of delivery of the placenta or at 4-6 weeks postpartum. Study follow-up visits were conducted at 4-6 weeks postpartum, 10 weeks postpartum, and 6 months postpartum. From November 2013 to June 2015, eleven adolescents were randomized - six participants to the immediate postpartum LNG IUD insertion group, and five to the delayed insertion group. All six women in the immediate insertion group had successful immediate postpartum insertion; two of five women in the delayed insertion group had an IUD inserted. At six months postpartum, four of six women in the immediate insertion group had a LNG IUD in place; of the five women in the delayed group, three did not have a LNG IUD in place and two were pregnant. The study was discontinued after 19 months because of suboptimal enrollment. Though insertion of a LNG IUD immediately after delivery is an appropriate option for some adolescents, a larger prospective study comparing immediate to delayed LNG IUD insertion is unlikely to be feasible at our institution

Interpregnancy interval and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after dilation and evacuation

We conducted this study to compare outcomes for pregnancies conceived ≤6 months after dilation and evacuation (D&E) with those conceived >6 months after D&E. This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent D&E (14–26 weeks) and were readmitted with a subsequent pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of preterm birth (6 months (p = .17). No differences in preterm birth <34 weeks, postpartum haemorrhage, placentation abnormalities, intrauterine growth restriction, cervical insufficiency or mode of delivery were noted. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were not higher in the group of women who conceived ≤6 months after D&E compared to those who waited longer than 6 months.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject: A small number of studies have noted an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with an interpregnancy interval of 6 months or fewer after a spontaneous or an induced abortion. What the results of this study add: We present the first study exploring pregnancy outcomes after dilation and evacuation for termination of pregnancy at 14 weeks or greater. Our results do not support an increased rate of adverse events with an interpregnancy interval of 6 months or fewer following dilation and evacuation. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Because of limitations in sample size, our results should be interpreted in the context of other studies

Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device

ObjectiveTo determine how many intrauterine device (IUD) users are willing and able to palpate their IUD strings.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among IUD users presenting for their 6-week follow-up visit after insertion at the University of Hawaii, USA, between January 2011 and January 2012. Participants were asked whether they had previously felt the strings and whether they were willing to do so during the visit. Bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression were performed.ResultsPrevious attempts to palpate IUD strings were reported by 74 (58.7%) of 126 participants, of whom 49 (66.2%) could feel the strings. At the study visit, 60 (47.6%) participants were willing to try to feel their strings; 33 (55.0%) were successful. Overall, 58 (46.0%) participants were willing and able to palpate their IUD strings at home and/or at the study visit. Fewer women who self-identified as native Hawaiian than women of other races reported previous attempts (P=0.005). Previous instruction to check IUD strings was associated with willingness to palpate them before and after controlling for native Hawaiian race (odds ratio 8.78, 95% CI 3.43-22.43; adjusted odds ratio 9.64, 95% CI 3.57-26.04).ConclusionApproximately half the participants were willing and able to palpate their IUD strings. Routinely counseling women to check their IUD strings could have limited clinical utility