Incident Gallstones During Somatostatin Analog Treatment are Associated with Acute Biliary Complications Especially After Discontinuation

INTRODUCTION: Gallstones are a known adverse effect of somatostatin analogs, but the exact incidence and clinical implications are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of gallstones on imaging and related complications in unbiased trial data. METHODS: Data from the DIPAK 1 trial, in which 305 polycystic kidney disease patients were randomized to standard of care (SoC) or lanreotide for 120 weeks, were used. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline and end of treatment and was assessed for the presence, number, and size of gallstones. For all patients who had gallstones at the end of the trial, we obtained follow-up after the trial. RESULTS: Of 249 patients with data available, 11 patients randomized to lanreotide and four randomized to SoC had gallstones at baseline. During the study, new gallstones were formed in 19/124 patients using lanreotide (15%) and 1/125 patients receiving SoC (1%). The odds ratio for gallstone formation with lanreotide use was 25.9 (95% confidence interval 3.37–198.8; p  20 stones in 69% of patients) and small (≤ 3 mm in 63% of patients). Of the 19 patients with incident gallstones during lanreotide treatment, 9 experienced gallstone-associated complications, 8 of whom experienced gallstone-associated complications after discontinuation of treatment (median time after discontinuation 2.5 years). In patients with gallstones at baseline and in patients receiving SoC, no complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a somatostatin analog leads to the formation of multiple, small gallstones that are associated with severe complications, especially after discontinuation of therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY WEBSITE AND TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov); NCT01616927. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40268-021-00342-7

Extracellular Vesicles in Kidney Diseases:Moving Forward

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are evolving as novel cell mediators, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets in kidney health and disease. They are naturally derived from cells both within and outside the kidney and carry cargo which mirrors the state of the parent cell. Thus, they are potentially more sensitive and disease-specific as biomarkers and messengers in various kidney diseases. Beside their role as novel communicators within the nephron, they likely communicate between different organs affected by various kidney diseases. Study of urinary EVs (uEVs) can help to fill current knowledge gaps in kidney diseases. However, separation and characterization are challenged by their heterogeneity in size, shape, and cargo. Fortunately, more sensitive and direct EV measuring tools are in development. Many clinical syndromes in nephrology from acute to chronic kidney and glomerular to tubular diseases have been studied. Yet, validation of biomarkers in larger cohorts is warranted and simpler tools are needed. Translation from in vitro to in vivo studies is also urgently needed. The therapeutic role of uEVs in kidney diseases has been studied extensively in rodent models of AKI. On the basis of the current exponential growth of EV research, the field of EV diagnostics and therapeutics is moving forward.</p

Urinary extracellular vesicles: A position paper by the Urine Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles

Urine is commonly used for clinical diagnosis and biomedical research. The discovery of extracellular vesicles (EV) in urine opened a new fast-growing scientific field. In the last decade urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) were shown to mirror molecular processes as well as physiological and pathological conditions in kidney, urothelial and prostate tissue. Therefore, several methods to isolate and characterize uEVs have been developed. However, methodological aspects of EV separation and analysis, including normalization of results, need further optimization and standardization to foster scientific advances in uEV research and a subsequent successful translation into clinical practice. This position paper is written by the Urine Task Force of the Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee of ISEV consisting of nephrologists, urologists, cardiologists and biologists with active experience in uEV research. Our aim is to present the state of the art and identify challenges and gaps in current uEV-based analyses for clinical applications. Finally, recommendations for improved rigor, reproducibility and interoperability in uEV research are provided in order to facilitate advances in the field

Urinary extracellular vesicles and tubular transport

Tubular transport is a key function of the kidney to maintain electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis. Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) harbor water, electrolyte, and acid-base transporters expressed at the apical plasma membrane of tubular epithelial cells. Within the uEV proteome, the correlations between kidney and uEV protein abundances are strongest for tubular transporters. Therefore, uEVs offer a noninvasive approach to probing tubular transport in health and disease. Here, we review how kidney tubular physiology is reflected in uEVs and, conversely, how uEVs may modify tubular transport. Clinically, uEV tubular transporter profiling has been applied to rare diseases, such as inherited tubulopathies, but also to more common conditions, such as hypertension and kidney disease. Although uEVs hold the promise to advance the diagnosis of kidney disease to the molecular level, several biological and technical complexities must still be addressed. The future will tell whether uEV analysis will mainly be a powerful tool to study tubular physiology in humans or whether it will move forward to become a diagnostic bedside test

Extracellular Vesicles in Kidney Diseases: Moving Forward

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are evolving as novel cell mediators, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets in kidney health and disease. They are naturally derived from cells both within and outside the kidney and carry cargo which mirrors the state of the parent cell. Thus, they are potentially more sensitive and disease-specific as biomarkers and messengers in various kidney diseases. Beside their role as novel communicators within the nephron, they likely communicate between different organs affected by various kidney diseases. Study of urinary EVs (uEVs) can help to fill current knowledge gaps in kidney diseases. However, separation and characterization are challenged by their heterogeneity in size, shape, and cargo. Fortunately, more sensitive and direct EV measuring tools are in development. Many clinical syndromes in nephrology from acute to chronic kidney and glomerular to tubular diseases have been studied. Yet, validation of biomarkers in larger cohorts is warranted and simpler tools are needed. Translation from in vitro to in vivo studies is also urgently needed. The therapeutic role of uEVs in kidney diseases has been studied extensively in rodent models of AKI. On the basis of the current exponential growth of EV research, the field of EV diagnostics and therapeutics is moving forward

Serum bicarbonate is associated with kidney outcomes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Background: Metabolic acidosis accelerates progression of chronic kidney disease, but whether this is also true for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is unknown. Methods: Patients with ADPKD from the DIPAK (Developing Interventions to halt Progression of ADPKD) trial were included [n = 296, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 50 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2, 2.5 years follow-up]. Outcomes were worsening kidney function (30% decrease in eGFR or kidney failure), annual eGFR change and height-adjusted total kidney and liver volumes (htTKV and htTLV). Cox and linear regressions were adjusted for prognostic markers for ADPKD [Mayo image class and predicting renal outcomes in ADPKD (PROPKD) scores] and acid-base parameters (urinary ammonium excretion). Results: Patients in the lowest tertile of baseline serum bicarbonate (23.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L) had a significantly greater risk of worsening kidney function [hazard ratio = 2.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-7.19] compared with patients in the highest tertile (serum bicarbonate 29.0 ± 1.3 mmol/L). Each mmol/L decrease in serum bicarbonate increased the risk of worsening kidney function by 21% in the fully adjusted model (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.37). Each mmol/L decrease of serum bicarbonate was also associated with further eGFR decline (-0.12 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.03). Serum bicarbonate was not associated with changes in htTKV or htTLV growth. Conclusions: In patients with ADPKD, a lower serum bicarbonate within the normal range predicts worse kidney outcomes independent of established prognostic factors for ADPKD and independent of urine ammonium excretion. Serum bicarbonate may add to prognostic models and should be explored as a treatment target in ADPKD