Improved Efficacy of First-Line Imatinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST):The Dutch GIST Registry Data

BACKGROUND: Patients with unresectable and metastasized gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) experienced a remarkable improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the introduction of imatinib. Our hypothesis is that the outcomes of treatment with imatinib are even better nowadays compared with the registration trials that were performed two decades ago. To study this, we used real-life data from a contemporary registry.METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed by exploring clinical data from a prospective real-life clinical database, the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR). Patients with advanced GIST treated with first-line imatinib were included and PFS (primary outcome) and OS (secondary outcome) were analyzed. Results of our study were compared with published results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 62005 trial, which marked the first era of imatinib in the treatment of GIST.RESULTS: Overall, 420 of the 435 patients treated with imatinib in the DGR had recorded response evaluation and were included in the analysis. During a median follow-up of 35.0 months (range 2.0-136.0), progression of GIST was eventually observed in 217 patients (51.2%). The DGR cohort showed a longer median PFS (33.0 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.4-37.6) compared with the EORTC 62005 trial (an estimated PFS of 19.5 months). Additionally, the median OS of 68.0 months (95% CI 56.1-80.0) was longer than the exposed median OS (46.8 months) published in the long-term follow-up results of the EORTC 62005 trial (median follow-up duration 10.9 years).CONCLUSION: This study provides an update on outcomes of imatinib in the treatment of advanced GIST patients and demonstrates improved clinical outcomes since the first randomized studies of imatinib 2 decades ago. Furthermore, these results represent outcomes in real-world clinical practice and can serve as a reference when evaluating effectiveness of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST.</p

Multimodality treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (eUPS) in the elderly

Introduction: This subgroup analysis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (eUPS) from the PERSARC collaborative group aimed to achieve a more personalized multimodality treatment approach for primary eUPS in elderly patients. Material and methods: A multicenter retrospective study including primary high-grade eUPS surgically treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2016. Overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) curves were calculated by Kaplan Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the effect of radiotherapy. Results: From a total of 2511 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) of the PERSARC study collaborative; 703 patients with eUPS were included in this study. In elderly patients with eUPS 5-year OS, LR and DM were 35.4 (95%CI 29.3–42.8), 17.7 (95%CI 12.7–22.6) and 24.6 (95%CI 19.1–30.1). eUPS was significantly less treated with radiotherapy compared with other eSTS, especially in elderly patients. Patients with R1-R2 margins treated with radiotherapy had about half the risk of developing LR compared with patients treated without radiotherapy (HR = 0.454, p = 0.033). Conclusion: Elderly patients with eUPS were less often treated with radiotherapy and showed higher LR. Nowadays, given an increasing life expectancy in elderly patients, multimodality treatment should be considered

Treatment dilemmas in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who experienced imatinib-induced pneumonitis:A case series

Introduction: Imatinib has led to a phenomenal progress in the treatment of GIST. A rare and lesser-known side effect of imatinib is pneumonitis, an uncommon multicausal interstitial lung disease. Methods: Patients registered within the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) were reviewed. For the patients identified with an imatinib-induced pneumonitis we reported the time on imatinib to develop pneumonitis, how the pneumonitis was diagnosed, graded and managed, and how the GIST treatment was managed. Cases: Of the 1934 patients registered in the DGR, 1161 patients received imatinib at some point, of which nine patients (0.8 %) were identified with an imatinib-induced pneumonitis. At time of the pneumonitis, patients received a daily imatinib dose of 200–400 mg for a mean duration of 486 days. One patient was able to continue imatinib in a lower dose, in the other eight patients imatinib was interrupted, and six of these patients started prednisolone treatment. After management of the imatinib-induced pneumonitis, four patients stopped imatinib permanently, two patients were rechallenged with imatinib, and two patients started treatment with second-line sunitinib. Conclusion: Imatinib-induced pneumonitis is a rare side effect, which may affect GIST management considerably. After the management of imatinib-induced pneumonitis, clinicians are left with difficult treatment dilemmas.</p

Treatment dilemmas in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who experienced imatinib-induced pneumonitis:A case series

Introduction: Imatinib has led to a phenomenal progress in the treatment of GIST. A rare and lesser-known side effect of imatinib is pneumonitis, an uncommon multicausal interstitial lung disease. Methods: Patients registered within the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) were reviewed. For the patients identified with an imatinib-induced pneumonitis we reported the time on imatinib to develop pneumonitis, how the pneumonitis was diagnosed, graded and managed, and how the GIST treatment was managed. Cases: Of the 1934 patients registered in the DGR, 1161 patients received imatinib at some point, of which nine patients (0.8 %) were identified with an imatinib-induced pneumonitis. At time of the pneumonitis, patients received a daily imatinib dose of 200–400 mg for a mean duration of 486 days. One patient was able to continue imatinib in a lower dose, in the other eight patients imatinib was interrupted, and six of these patients started prednisolone treatment. After management of the imatinib-induced pneumonitis, four patients stopped imatinib permanently, two patients were rechallenged with imatinib, and two patients started treatment with second-line sunitinib. Conclusion: Imatinib-induced pneumonitis is a rare side effect, which may affect GIST management considerably. After the management of imatinib-induced pneumonitis, clinicians are left with difficult treatment dilemmas.</p

Treatment dilemmas in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who experienced imatinib-induced pneumonitis:A case series

Introduction: Imatinib has led to a phenomenal progress in the treatment of GIST. A rare and lesser-known side effect of imatinib is pneumonitis, an uncommon multicausal interstitial lung disease. Methods: Patients registered within the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) were reviewed. For the patients identified with an imatinib-induced pneumonitis we reported the time on imatinib to develop pneumonitis, how the pneumonitis was diagnosed, graded and managed, and how the GIST treatment was managed. Cases: Of the 1934 patients registered in the DGR, 1161 patients received imatinib at some point, of which nine patients (0.8 %) were identified with an imatinib-induced pneumonitis. At time of the pneumonitis, patients received a daily imatinib dose of 200–400 mg for a mean duration of 486 days. One patient was able to continue imatinib in a lower dose, in the other eight patients imatinib was interrupted, and six of these patients started prednisolone treatment. After management of the imatinib-induced pneumonitis, four patients stopped imatinib permanently, two patients were rechallenged with imatinib, and two patients started treatment with second-line sunitinib. Conclusion: Imatinib-induced pneumonitis is a rare side effect, which may affect GIST management considerably. After the management of imatinib-induced pneumonitis, clinicians are left with difficult treatment dilemmas.</p

Individualized Dosing Patterns in the Treatment of Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors:Results of a Registry-Based Observational National Cohort Study Including 871 Patients

Background: While the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) seems similar in older patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) compared with younger patients, toxicities in older patients treated with TKIs more often lead to discontinuation of treatment. Objective: To better understand the age-related pharmacology and pharmacodynamic differences in patients with GIST treated with TKIs, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate TKI dosing patterns in older patients with GIST, while the secondary aims were to evaluate differences in imatinib trough plasma concentrations between age groups and to compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with and without dose reductions in all treatment lines in a palliative setting. Methods: Patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically proven GIST diagnosed between January 2009 and June 2021 and treated with one or more lines of TKIs were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) database. Age groups were divided into younger patients (age &lt;70 years) and older patients (age ≥70 years). All imatinib trough plasma concentrations of blood withdrawals taken from initiation of imatinib until a maximum of 1 year of treatment with imatinib were collected. Reasons for first adjustment of treatment were classified as adverse event, dose modification, progressive disease and other reasons. The next treatment steps after first adjustment of treatment were defined as dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, or end of treatment. The association of dose reduction and OS was analyzed using the landmark approach. Results: Overall, 871 patients were included in this study, including 577 younger patients and 294 older patients. Older patients more often had an adverse event as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with both imatinib (45.6%; p &lt; 0.001) and sunitinib (58.6%; p = 0.224) compared with younger patients (19.5% and 42.7%, respectively). Adjustment of imatinib and sunitinib after starting on a standard dose because of an adverse event most often resulted in dose reduction in both age groups. Median trough plasma concentrations of all samples taken within the first year after initiation of imatinib were higher in older patients (1228 ng/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 959–1687) compared with younger patients (1035 ng/mL [IQR 773–1377]; p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were seen between OS in patients with or without dose reduction in all treatment lines (imatinib: p = 0.270; sunitinib: p = 0.547; and regorafenib: p = 0.784). Conclusion: Older patients showed higher imatinib trough plasma concentrations compared with younger patients and also had earlier and more often adverse events as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with imatinib followed by dose reduction. However, in a landmark analysis, patients with imatinib dose reductions had no poorer outcomes compared with patients not requiring a dose reduction.</p

Dutch Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Registry Data Comparing Sunitinib with Imatinib Dose Escalation in Second-Line Advanced Non-KIT Exon 9 Mutated GIST Patients

Background: The prognosis of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has improved greatly after the introduction of imatinib. However, primary or secondary resistance to imatinib occurs in the majority of patients. Sunitinib is the standard second line treatment in exon-9 mutated GIST. Objective: We compared the clinical outcomes of sunitinib with imatinib dose escalation in patients with progressive advanced non-KIT exon 9 mutated GIST after failure of first line imatinib. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was performed, retrieving data from a real-life database (Dutch GIST Registry) including patients with GIST treated with sunitinib or imatinib dose escalation after failure on first line imatinib 400 mg daily. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 110 patients were included, 72 (65.5%) patients were treated with sunitinib (group A) and 38 (34.5%) received an imatinib dose escalation (group B). Important prognostic features at baseline, such as tumor size, stage at diagnosis, mitotic count and localization were equally distributed in both groups. No significant difference (p = 0.88) between median PFS in group A [8.7 months (95% CI 5.6–11.3)] and group B [5.6 months, (95% CI 2.6–8.7)] was observed. Moreover, the OS was similar between group A and group B; 63.2 months and 63.4 months, respectively. Conclusion: This study represents a proper sample size cohort containing detailed data on mutational status of patients with advanced GIST. We illustrated that imatinib dose escalation could serve as a good alternative for sunitinib as second-line treatment in patients with a non-KIT exon 9 mutation

Local recurrence in primary localised resected gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A registry observational national cohort study including 912 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous literature showed a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, little is known about the patient- and treatment characteristics of local recurrences (LRs) in GIST patients. Therefore, this study aimed to better understand patterns of LR in surgically treated localised GIST and to describe treatment options based on our Dutch GIST Registry (DGR). METHODS: Data of primary surgically treated localised GIST between January 2009 until July 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from the DGR. RESULTS: Of 1452 patients registered in the DGR, 912 patients were included in this study. Only 3.8% (35/912) of patients developed LR, including 20 patients with LR only and 15 patients with simultaneous LR and distant metastases (DM). Median time to LR was 30 (interquartile range 8-53) months from date of surgery. Eleven percent (100/912) of patients developed only DM. A total of 2.3% (6/259) of patients treated with adjuvant treatment developed an LR during adjuvant therapy. Seventy percent of patients with LR only (14/20) were treated with surgery (85.7% R0), which was mostly combined with systemic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary surgically treated localised GIST have a limited risk of developing recurrence. Fifteen percent developed recurrence, of which one quarter developed an LR. Therefore, less intensified follow-up schedules could be considered, especially during treatment with adjuvant imatinib. In patients with LR only, potentially curative treatment strategies, including surgical (re-)resection, are often possible as treatment for LR

Individualized Dosing Patterns in the Treatment of Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors:Results of a Registry-Based Observational National Cohort Study Including 871 Patients

Background: While the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) seems similar in older patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) compared with younger patients, toxicities in older patients treated with TKIs more often lead to discontinuation of treatment. Objective: To better understand the age-related pharmacology and pharmacodynamic differences in patients with GIST treated with TKIs, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate TKI dosing patterns in older patients with GIST, while the secondary aims were to evaluate differences in imatinib trough plasma concentrations between age groups and to compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with and without dose reductions in all treatment lines in a palliative setting. Methods: Patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically proven GIST diagnosed between January 2009 and June 2021 and treated with one or more lines of TKIs were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) database. Age groups were divided into younger patients (age &lt;70 years) and older patients (age ≥70 years). All imatinib trough plasma concentrations of blood withdrawals taken from initiation of imatinib until a maximum of 1 year of treatment with imatinib were collected. Reasons for first adjustment of treatment were classified as adverse event, dose modification, progressive disease and other reasons. The next treatment steps after first adjustment of treatment were defined as dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, or end of treatment. The association of dose reduction and OS was analyzed using the landmark approach. Results: Overall, 871 patients were included in this study, including 577 younger patients and 294 older patients. Older patients more often had an adverse event as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with both imatinib (45.6%; p &lt; 0.001) and sunitinib (58.6%; p = 0.224) compared with younger patients (19.5% and 42.7%, respectively). Adjustment of imatinib and sunitinib after starting on a standard dose because of an adverse event most often resulted in dose reduction in both age groups. Median trough plasma concentrations of all samples taken within the first year after initiation of imatinib were higher in older patients (1228 ng/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 959–1687) compared with younger patients (1035 ng/mL [IQR 773–1377]; p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were seen between OS in patients with or without dose reduction in all treatment lines (imatinib: p = 0.270; sunitinib: p = 0.547; and regorafenib: p = 0.784). Conclusion: Older patients showed higher imatinib trough plasma concentrations compared with younger patients and also had earlier and more often adverse events as the reason for first adjustment of treatment with imatinib followed by dose reduction. However, in a landmark analysis, patients with imatinib dose reductions had no poorer outcomes compared with patients not requiring a dose reduction.</p

Dutch Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Registry Data Comparing Sunitinib with Imatinib Dose Escalation in Second-Line Advanced Non-KIT Exon 9 Mutated GIST Patients

Background: The prognosis of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has improved greatly after the introduction of imatinib. However, primary or secondary resistance to imatinib occurs in the majority of patients. Sunitinib is the standard second line treatment in exon-9 mutated GIST. Objective: We compared the clinical outcomes of sunitinib with imatinib dose escalation in patients with progressive advanced non-KIT exon 9 mutated GIST after failure of first line imatinib. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was performed, retrieving data from a real-life database (Dutch GIST Registry) including patients with GIST treated with sunitinib or imatinib dose escalation after failure on first line imatinib 400 mg daily. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 110 patients were included, 72 (65.5%) patients were treated with sunitinib (group A) and 38 (34.5%) received an imatinib dose escalation (group B). Important prognostic features at baseline, such as tumor size, stage at diagnosis, mitotic count and localization were equally distributed in both groups. No significant difference (p = 0.88) between median PFS in group A [8.7 months (95% CI 5.6–11.3)] and group B [5.6 months, (95% CI 2.6–8.7)] was observed. Moreover, the OS was similar between group A and group B; 63.2 months and 63.4 months, respectively. Conclusion: This study represents a proper sample size cohort containing detailed data on mutational status of patients with advanced GIST. We illustrated that imatinib dose escalation could serve as a good alternative for sunitinib as second-line treatment in patients with a non-KIT exon 9 mutation