24 research outputs found

    Commentary on Gilbert

    Get PDF

    Commentary on Gratton

    Get PDF

    Commentary on Woods

    Get PDF

    Culture, Judgment, Integration of Attention and Argumentation

    Get PDF
    Some exchanges of reasons are agonistic. Others work mutually, as in planning and adjusting divergent understanding. Mutual argumentation subconsciously yields judgment that integrates and clarifies a common vision coordinating interrelated lives. It harmonizes agents sharing a space of action and understanding. Pierre Bourdieu held that such thought generates and expresses culture, patterning a logic that reflexively constrains itself. This discussion examines Bourdieu’s views as an analysis of mutual argumentation

    Commentary on Carozza

    Get PDF

    Community, argumentation, and the legitimacy of reasons for action

    Get PDF
    Communities gather persons sharing saliencies, the meaning of events, and accountability based in shared values and practices. These shared features ensure community wide legitimacy for moral agents and their reasons for acting. But they also might ensure personal reasons for action are not universally legitimate. This discussion considers Hannah Arendt’s and an alternative view of judgment seeking an ac-count of community-limited legitimacy for reasons in both moral and closely related political thought

    Wide reflective equilibrium and conductive argument

    Get PDF
    In this paper I compare and contrast Rawls’s notion of reflective equilibrium with Wellman‘s notion of conductive argument. In the course of so doing I will address two key questions: (1) Are conduc-tive argument and reflective equilibrium best understood as modes of reasoning or types of argument? and (2) What relationship (logical, pragmatic, etc.), if any, is there between them

    Ought' Without 'Can.'.

    Full text link
    Ph.D.PhilosophyUniversity of Michiganhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/157136/1/7123703.pd
    corecore