4 research outputs found

    Participación e investigación comunitaria de animación sociocultural en establecimiento carcelario masculino

    Get PDF
    Servicio Social ComunitarioInicialmente se desea resaltar la importancia que tiene la psicología comunitaria en los establecimientos carcelarios, puesto que permitió conocer, intervenir y establecer el impacto que tiene sobre las personas que pierden su libertad. Ahora bien, la animación sociocultural realizada en el establecimiento penitenciario y carcelario “La Modelo” de mediana seguridad de Bogotá, logró generar un desarrollo de ciudadanía en las PPL (personas privadas de la libertad) gracias a las diferentes estrategias pedagógicas utilizadas por medio del deporte, generando así una transformación social a nivel colectivo.1. RESUMEN 2. DESCRIPCIÓN DE LA PROBLEMÁTICA 3. CONTEXTO INSTITUCIONAL, GEOGRÁFICO Y POBLACIONAL 4. JUSTIFICACIÓN 5. DELIMITACIÓN DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN 6. OBJETIVOS 7. MARCO TEÓRICO 8. MARCO METODOLÓGICO 9. DISEÑO METODOLÓGICO DE LA INTERVENCIÓN 10. CATEGORÍAS DE ANÁLISIS 11. MATRIZ OPERATIVA DEL PROYECTO 12. ANÁLISIS DE PROCESOS 13. REFERENCIAS 14. ANEXOSPregradoPsicólog

    Carta de Psicología No. 53

    No full text
    Comprensión neuropsicológica de la enfermedad de Parkinson........3 María Fernanda Obregón Guavita Aprendizajes y experiencias en el semillero LAPSUCC: nuestro año como investigadores en neuropsicología ......6 Gabriel Almeida, María Paula Bernal, Laura Valentina Ruiz, Daniela Arévalo y Tatiana Manrique Entrenamiento cognitivo en el deterioro cognitivo leve - Trastorno neurocognitivo leve. 9 Luz Adriana Penagos, Angie Tatiana Contreras Cifuentes, Jhon Erick Chacón Ruiz, María Emily Triana, Daniela Alejandra Martínez Sarmiento, Valeria Valentina Palencia Amaya, Juliana Martínez Cárdenas, Natalia Caicedo Tamara, Johanna Castillo, María Lucía Blanco Parga, Ana Lorena Muñoz Valdés, Miguel Ángel Patarroyo, Sonia Gisela Ríos Cruz Articulación: de la educación media a superior...16 Daniela García, Camila Clavijo, Paola Peñuela, Tatiana Flores Mediación de la trascendencia en el ámbito educativo....18 Estefany Cuéllar González, Laura Camila Vargas López, Importancia de la orientación temporal en el niño........20 Andrómeda Katherine Gutiérrez Rueda, Claudia Paola Martínez Devia La castración química: el debate del populismo punitivo....22 Daniel Ricardo Riaño García, Laura Camila Jaimes Castillo, Angie Nathaly Infante , Hernández, Ever José López Cantero, Factores psicológicos en las personas privadas de la libertad condenadas por el delito de violencia intrafamiliar......26 Gerardo Andrés Merchán Mesa, Jordan Micaela Castelblanco Zamora, Ever José López Cantero, Karol Tatiana Triana Caballero, Katherine Álvarez Modelo ecológico para la compresión de las conductas infractoras en adolescentes.....29 Ana María Altamar Escorcia, Daniela Alvarado Ospina, María Isabel Castillo Camargo, Adriana Yulieth, Gómez Núñez, Ever José López Cantero, Luz Ángela Vega Gómez, Rocío Ordóñez Gómez, Bertha Liliana Ortiz Triviño y Lorena Osorio Rosales Inteligencia emocional y estrés académico en estudiantes universitarios.... 35 Johana Orozco, Valery Ramírez, María José Saavedra, y Javier Yépez Arrieta Uso de minería de textos para la exploración de creencias epistemológicas....37 Santiago Amaya Nassar Emociones, dinero, amigos y sexualidad en universitarios durante la cuarentena..... 42 Daniela Barbosa Sentido de comunidad: hacia una nueva conciencia comunitaria.....................45 Xiomara González Alarcón Participación y sentido de país.........47 Angie Lorena Ruiz, Andrea Lorena Villamil El semillero, una oportunidad de formación para estudiantes de pregrado y de especialización...........50 Liliana Quintero e Itala Marina Camargo Uso de minería de textos para el análisis de la participación de los egresados en los órganos de gobierno de las instituciones de educación superior .52 Sergio Andrés Flautero Mes

    Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

    No full text
    © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

    Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

    No full text
    © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research
    corecore