Time of Suckling Implant Influences onWeaning Weight, Post-weaning Performance, and Carcass Traits in Steer Calves

The effect of time of suckling calf implant (SCI) use on weaning weight (WW), post-weaning performance and subsequent carcass traits was compared in steer calves produced on one ranch in western SD. Calves were born in March and April of each year and were reared on native range prior to weaning. The SCI strategies used included: non implanted controls (NI) or implanted with Synovex C either in May (MAY), or August (AUG). Age groups of dams (≥4 years) were managed separately through the breeding seasons. At weaning (late October) all calves were weaned and relocated to the SDSU Ruminant Nutrition Center feedlot. Steers were individually weighed, vaccinated, and treated for parasites and the processing body weight recorded was considered the WW. Steers were sorted into feedlot pens by SCI treatment (8 or 9 steers/pen; 8 pens/treatment; 24 pens/yr). Steers were backgrounded and finished using diets and management typical for this region and included the use of implants uniformly across SCI treatments. Both the MAY and AUG implant treatments increased WW over non-implanted calves. The magnitude of this was response interacted with the age of the dams. Steers nursing mature cows and implanted in May had the greatest increase in WW over NI (40 lb). The WW advantage for steers nursing mature cows and implanted in August was reduced to 17 lb. Timing of implant administration had the opposite effect in young cows and was more beneficial when steers were implanted in August. The weight advantage due to suckling implants persisted through to carcass weight. The SCI treatments did not affect the post-weaning ADG or feed efficiency of the steers and had no adverse effects on Quality Grade of the carcasses produced. There was a substantial benefit to the cow calf producer to match the time of implant administration with the age of the dam with no adverse impact on overall beef production

Racial environment and political participation

This research addresses the determinants of mass participation by developing a model of how the racial environment influences mass participation in the United States. Prior literature on this research question presents two competing expectations. The power-threat hypothesis predicts that a larger size of different racial groups in local areas increases citizen participation because of more intensive interracial con- flicts, while the relational goods hypothesis predicts that a larger size of different racial groups decreases participation because of less frequent interaction with other in-group members. Both hypotheses, however, are derived from rather weak theoretical expectations, and neither is consistently supported in empirical analyses. This research offers a solution to this puzzle by arguing that economic and political characteristics of local areas determine how the racial composition influences mass participation. Local economic and political competition is expected to structure the nature of interracial and intraracial relations and therefore influence the utility calculation associated with political participation. I hypothesize that the power-threat effect on citizen participation is observed only when the degree of economic or political competition is high, while the relational goods effect is observed only when the degree of economic or political competition is low. Empirical analysis using Verba, Schlozman, and Brady’s Citizen Participation Study offers supportive evidence for my hypotheses. This research offers the first theoretically-motivated, rigorous analysis and evidence of the impact of immediate racial environment on individuals’ participation

Casual models in the social sciences : H.M. Blalock

xi, 515 p.; 23 cm

Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers in Small Local Communities

The admission and geographic distribution of asylum seekers has a central place in public discourse in Western countries, amid mounting asylum applications and dire humanitarian crises. Receiving countries usually distribute the newly arriving asylum seekers across the entire country, in particular for small remote communities. Incidental opposition actions by local residents against the siting of Asylum Seeker Centres (ASC) has created the perception of strong and widespread resistance in the public sphere. This article aims to assess this alleged backlash by examining attitudes toward asylum seekers in small local communities. Using data from three representative surveys conducted among residents in the vicinity of four ASCs in the Netherlands, the regression analysis shows a strikingly high willingness to host an ASC, in opposition to popularly assumed public opinion