Uso de una malla profilactica para la prevención de la hernia incisional en pacientes con una laparotomia subcostal bilateral

El uso de una malla profiláctica para prevenir una hernia incisional es cada vez más común en laparotomías medias y en colostomías dada la elevada incidencia de hernia incisional en estás incisiones. Hasta la realización de este estudio no existía ningún trabajo publicado, sobre la utilización de mallas profilácticas para la prevención de la hernia incisional de laparotomías subcostales, que si bien son algo menos frecuentes, su reparación es más compleja. Nos planteamos realizar un estudio con el objetivo de reducir la incidencia de hernia incisional en pacientes operados a través de una laparotomía subcostal bilateral implantando una malla de polipropileno autofijable en el plano intermuscular en el momento del cierre de la laparotomía. Material y Métodos: Estudio de cohortes, prospectivo, longitudinal de pacientes sometidos a una laparotomía subcostal bilateral en cirugía electiva. El grupo con malla está formado por pacientes operados consecutivamente entre 2011 y 2013 con una malla profiláctica autofijable (Parietene ProGrip Self-Fixating Mesh; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). El grupo control está analizado retrospectivamente y está formado por pacientes operados consecutivamente entre 2009 y 2011 y con laparotomías cerradas según un protocolo de cierre convencional en dos planos. Se revisa la incidencia de hernia incisional en los dos primeros años tras la cirugía con criterios clínicos y radiológicos. Resultados: Un total de 57 pacientes han sido incluidos en el grupo control y 58 en el grupo con malla. A la mayoría de los pacientes se le realizó una cirugía gástrica, hepática, pancreática y la mayoría eran pacientes oncológicos. Los dos grupos eran homogéneos en cuanto a sus características demográficas y clínicas. El tiempo quirúrgico y la estancia hospitalaria fue similar en ambos grupos. Ambos grupos tenían un índice de complicaciones locales y sistémicas comparables. Diez pacientes (17.5%) en el grupo control desarrollaron hernia incisional frente a solo un paciente (1.7%) en el grupo con malla (P=.0006) Conclusiones: La incidencia de hernia incisional después de un cierre convencional de una laparotomía subcostal bilateral es significativa. El uso de una malla profiláctica durante el cierre de una laparotomía subcostal bilateral es seguro y reduce la incidencia de hernia incisiona

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Utilizing the Combination of Absorbable and Permanent Mesh in a Retromuscular Position: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Background Optimal mesh reinforcement for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in complex hernias remains questionable. Use of biologic, absorbable and synthetic meshes has been described. The idea of using an absorbable mesh (AM) under a permanent mesh (PM) in a retromuscular position may help in these challenging situations. Methods Between 2011 and 2016, consecutive patients undergoing open AWR utilizing an AM as posterior layer reinforcement and configuration of a large PM were identified in a multicenter prospectively maintained database in four hospitals. Main outcomes included demographics, ventral hernia classifications, perioperative data, complications and recurrences. Results A total of 169 complex incisional hernias were analyzed. Mean age was 60.9, with mean body mass index 30.7 (range: 20–46). Location of incisional hernias (IH) was: 80 midline, 59 lateral and 30 midline and lateral. 78% were grade I and II in Ventral Hernia Working Group classification. 52% of patients were discharged with no complication. There were 19% seromas, 13% hematomas, 12% surgical-site infection and 10% skin dehiscence. Only partial mesh removal was necessary in one patient. After a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 15–59), there were five (3.2%) recurrences. Reoperations on patients showed a band of fibrosis separating the peritoneum from the PM. Conclusion The combination of AM with very large PM in the same retromuscular position in AWR seems to be safe. The efficacy with recurrence rates below 4% in complex midline and lateral IH may be explained by the use of larger PMs that are extended and configured with the support of AMs. Reoperations on patients have confirmed the previous experimental reports on the use of the AM.pre-print1351 K

Stepwise transversus abdominis muscle release for the treatment of complex bilateral subcostal incisional hernias.

Background Management of subcostal incisional hernias is particularly complicated due to their proximity to the costochondral limits in addition to the lack of aponeurosis on the lateral side of the abdomen. We present our results of posterior component separation through the same previous incision as a safe and reproducible technique for these complex cases. Methods We present a multicenter and prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with bilateral subcostal incisional hernias on either clinical examination or imaging based on computed tomography from 2014 to 2020. The aim of this investigation was to assess the outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction for subcostal incisional hernias through a new approach. The outcomes reported were short- and long-term complications, including recurrence, pain, and bulging. Quality of life was assessed with the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score. Results A total of 46 patients were identified. All patients underwent posterior component separation. Surgical site occurrences occurred in 10 patients (22%), with only 7 patients (15%) requiring procedural intervention. During a mean follow-up of 18 (range, 6–62), 1 (2%) case of clinical recurrence was registered. In addition, there were 8 (17%) patients with asymptomatic but visible bulging. The European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score showed a statistically significant decrease in the 3 domains (pain, restriction, and cosmetic) of the postoperative compared with the preoperative scores. Conclusion Posterior component separation technique for the repair of subcostal incisional hernias through the same incision is a safe procedure that avoids injury to the linea alba. It is associated with acceptable morbidity, low recurrence rate, and improvement in patients’ reported outcomes.pre-print371 K

Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with the combination of complex midline and lateral incisional hernias.

Background The best treatment for the combined defects of midline and lateral incisional hernia is not known. The aim of our multicenter study was to evaluate the operative and patient-reported outcomes using a modified posterior component separation in patients who present with the combination of midline and lateral incisional hernia. Methods We identified patients from a prospective, multicenter database who underwent operative repairs of a midline and lateral incisional hernia at 4 centers with minimum 2-year follow-up. Hernias were divided into a main hernia based on the larger size and associated abdominal wall hernias. Outcomes reported were short- and long-term complications, including recurrence, pain, and bulging. Quality of life was assessed with the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score. Results Fifty-eight patients were identified. Almost 70% of patients presented with a midline defect as the main incisional hernia. The operative technique was a transversus abdominis release in 26 patients (45%), a modification of transversus abdominis release 27 (47%), a reverse transversus abdominis release in 3 (5%), and a primary, lateral retromuscular preperitoneal approach in 2 (3%). Surgical site occurrences occurred in 22 patients (38%), with only 8 patients (14%) requiring procedural intervention. During a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 14.4 months, 2 (3%) cases of recurrence were diagnosed and required reoperation. There were also 4 (7%) patients with asymptomatic but visible bulging. The European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score showed a statistically significant decrease in the 3 domains (pain, restriction, and cosmetic) in the postoperative score compared with the preoperative score. Conclusion The different techniques of posterior component separation in the treatment of combined midline and lateral incisional hernia show acceptable results, despite the associated high complexity. Patient-reported outcomes after measurement of the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score demonstrated a clinically important improvement in quality of life and pain.post-print2.323 K

Prophylactic mesh can be used safely in the prevention of incisional hernia after bilateral subcostal laparotomies.

Background The use of prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia is becoming increasingly common in midline laparotomies and colostomies. The incidence of incisional hernia after subcostal laparotomies is lower than after midline incisions. Nevertheless, the treatment of subcostal incisional hernia is considered to be more complex. Currently, there are no published data about mesh augmentation procedures to close these laparotomies. Methods This was a longitudinal, prospective, cohort study of patients undergoing a bilateral subcostal laparotomy in elective operations. The mesh group was a group of patients operated consecutively between 2011 and 2013 with a prophylactic self-fixation mesh. The control group was selected from a retrospective analysis of patients operated between 2009 and 2010 and closed with a conventional protocol of 2-layer closure. The incidence of incisional hernia was recorded both clinically and radiologically for 2 years. Results A total of 57 patients were included in the control group and 58 in the mesh group. Most patients underwent gastric, hepatic, and pancreatic operations. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of their clinical and demographic characteristics. Operative time and hospital stay were similar in both groups. Both groups had a comparable rate of local and systemic complications. Ten patients (17.5%) in the control group developed an incisional hernia, and only 1 patient (1.7%) in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia (P = .0006). Conclusion The incidence of incisional hernia after a conventional closure of bilateral subcostal laparotomy is significant. The use of a mesh augmentation procedure for closing bilateral subcostal laparotomies is safe and may reduce the incidence of incisional hernia.pre-print1514 K