Motor Unit Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MUMRI) In Skeletal Muscle

\ua9 2024 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used in the musculoskeletal system to measure skeletal muscle structure and pathology in health and disease. Recently, it has been shown that MRI also has promise for detecting the functional changes, which occur in muscles, commonly associated with a range of neuromuscular disorders. This review focuses on novel adaptations of MRI, which can detect the activity of the functional sub-units of skeletal muscle, the motor units, referred to as “motor unit MRI (MUMRI).” MUMRI utilizes pulsed gradient spin echo, pulsed gradient stimulated echo and phase contrast MRI sequences and has, so far, been used to investigate spontaneous motor unit activity (fasciculation) and used in combination with electrical nerve stimulation to study motor unit morphology and muscle twitch dynamics. Through detection of disease driven changes in motor unit activity, MUMRI shows promise as a tool to aid in both earlier diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders and to help in furthering our understanding of the underlying mechanisms, which proceed gross structural and anatomical changes within diseased muscle. Here, we summarize evidence for the use of MUMRI in neuromuscular disorders and discuss what future research is required to translate MUMRI toward clinical practice. Level of Evidence: 5. Technical Efficacy: Stage 3

Whole-body fasciculation detection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using motor unit MRI (MUMRI)

\ua9 2024 International Federation of Clinical NeurophysiologyObjective: Compare fasciculation rates between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and healthy controls in body regions relevant for diagnosing ALS using motor unit MRI (MUMRI) at baseline and 6 months follow-up, and relate this to single-channel surface EMG (SEMG). Methods: Tongue, biceps brachii, paraspinals and lower legs were assessed with MUMRI and biceps brachii and soleus with SEMG in 10 healthy controls and 10 patients (9 typical ALS, 1 primary lateral sclerosis [PLS]). Results: MUMRI-detected fasciculation rates in typical ALS patients were higher compared to healthy controls for biceps brachii (2.40 \ub1 1.90 cm-3min−1 vs. 0.04 \ub1 0.10 cm-3min−1, p = 0.004), paraspinals (1.14 \ub1 1.61 cm-3min−1 vs. 0.02 \ub1 0.02 cm-3min−1, p = 0.016) and lower legs (1.42 \ub1 1.27 cm-3min−1 vs. 0.13 \ub1 0.10 cm-3min−1, p = 0.004), but not tongue (1.41 \ub1 1.94 cm-3min−1 vs. 0.18 \ub1 0.18 cm-3min−1, p = 0.556). The PLS patient showed no fasciculation. At baseline, 6/9 ALS patients had increased fasciculation rates compared to healthy controls in at least 2 body regions. At follow-up every patient had increased fasciculation rates in at least 2 body regions. The MUMRI-detected fasciculation rate correlated with SEMG-detected fasciculation rates (τ = 0.475, p = 0.006). Conclusion: MUMRI can non-invasively image fasciculation in multiple body regions and appears sensitive to disease progression in individual patients. Significance: MUMRI has potential as diagnostic tool for ALS