Determination of vancomycin in serum by liquid chromatography-high resolution full scan mass spectrometry

A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method was developed for the analysis of vancomycin (VCM) in human serum. The method was based on full scan data with extracted ions for the accurate masses of VCM and the atenolol internal standard obtained by Fourier transform MS. VCM was extracted from serum using strong cation exchange (SCX) solid phase extraction (SPE). The method was found to be linear in the range 0.05-10 μg/ml, which was adequate for quantification of VCM in serum samples, with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.005 μg/ml and a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.001 μg/ml. Intra-day precision (n = 5) was ±3.5%, ±2.5%, ±0.7% at 0.05, 0.5 and 5 μg/ml, respectively. Inter-day precision (n = 5) was ±7.6%, ±6.4%, ±3.9% at 0.05, 0.5 and 5 μg/ml, respectively. The process efficiency for VCM was in the range 89.2-98.1% with the recovery for the atenolol internal standard (IS) being 97.3%. The method was used to determine VCM levels in patients during peri-operative infusion of the drug, which was found to result in drug levels within the required therapeutic window

Vancomycin continuous infusion as prophylaxis for vascular surgery

Prosthetic graft infection is a devastating complication of vascular surgery that occurs in 3%-5% of clean prosthetic procedures. Staphylococci are the most frequently isolated pathogens, and thus surgical prophylaxis regimens often include vancomycin. However, the efficacy of these regimens in ensuring a required concentration of antibiotic is uncertain. This study aimed to determine if a continuous vancomycin infusion regimen administered perioperatively as surgical prophylaxis for vascular procedures maintained an adequate serum concentration. Thirty-four consecutive patients undergoing a vascular procedure requiring a prosthetic graft or patch were given vancomycin prophylaxis. Each patient received a loading dose calculated according to body weight 12 hours before surgery. A 24-hour continuous infusion was then started, based on calculated creatinine clearance. Serum vancomycin concentrations were checked on induction of anesthesia, 2 hours postoperatively, and at the end of the infusion. Perioperative fluid administration and blood loss were recorded. An estimated creatinine clearance was repeated on the second postoperative day. Of the 34 patients recruited, 7 did not have the anticipated procedure and 6 patients had incomplete sample collection. Twenty-one patients with complete sample collection were analyzed. The target concentration (10-25 mg/L) was achieved in 81% of all samples. All patients achieved the target concentration at 1 or more time points. The regimen employed provided appropriate concentrations at the time of intervention. No potentially toxic concentrations or adverse reactions to vancomycin were encountered. Vancomycin given as a continuous infusion delivers adequate serum concentration. Long-term graft infection rates are needed to show a clinical effect

A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and side-effect profile (nausea/vomiting/sedation) of morphine-6-glucuronide versus morphine for post-operative pain relief after major abdominal surgery

Morphine is the first choice of treatment of severe post-operative pain, despite the occurrence of often discomforting (post-operative nausea or vomiting (PONV)) and sometimes dangerous (sedation, respiratory depression) side effects. Literature data indicate that morphine's active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), is a powerful analgesic with a possibly more favourable side-effect profile. In this multi-centre randomised controlled clinical trial patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomised to M6G or morphine treatment. Treatment started 30-60 min prior to the end of surgery and was continued postoperatively, after patients were titrated to comfort, via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 24-48 h. Pain intensity, nausea, vomiting and sedation scores were collected at regular intervals. In the study 268 patients were randomised to M6G and 249 to morphine. Withdrawal due to insufficient pain relief occurred predominantly just after surgery and was higher in the M6G group (16.8%) than in the morphine group (8.8%), suggesting a slower onset of analgesia for M6G compared to morphine. Subjects who continued on PCA remained equi-analgesic throughout the study. During the first 24 h, nausea levels showed a 27% difference in favour of M6G which narrowly failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.052). Sub-analysis showed a significant reduction in nausea levels in females on M6G (30% difference, P = 0.034). In all patients, similar reductions of 30-35% were observed in anti-emetic use, vomiting, PONV (a combined measure of nausea and vomiting) in favour of M6G, persisting for the first 24 h postoperatively. Reductions in sedation were observed in the first 4 h post-operative period for M6G patients. (C) 2010 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All right