3 research outputs found
Maternal and neonatal characteristics of babies admitted with congenital CNS anomalies in a tertiary hospital in North Central Nigeria
Background: CNS anomalies are an important group of largely preventable congenital anomalies. Knowledge of maternal and neonatal sociodemographic characteristics could identify a pattern of population at risk in order to target preventive interventions.Methods: This was a 3-year retrospective review of health records of all neonates admitted with CNS anomalies in Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), Jos, central-Nigeria.Results: Out of a total of 27 neonates with congenital CNS anomalies reviewed, 25 had neural tube defects, 1 hydrocephalos and 1 anencephaly. The peak age group of mothers were 20-29years (44.4%) and 30-39 years (44.4%). Twenty-two (81.5%) mothers had antenatal care (ANC). No mother booked in the 1st month and only 7 (25.9%) booked in the first trimester. Twenty-four (88.9%) mothers took folic acid during pregnancy. No mother had peri-conceptional folic acid use. There were 11(40.7%) home births with 14(87.5%) of the 16 hospital births taking place in lower tier health facilities. Twenty-six (96.3%) mothers had vaginal delivery. An obstetric ultrasound scan was reported by one (3.7%) mother and did not detect the anomaly. Five (18.5%) of the mothers had HIV infection. Twenty-six were term with a male: female ratio of 1.1:1. The median age at presentation was 2 (interquartile range 1, 8) days.Conclusions: Neonates with congenital CNS anomalies in JUTH frequently had mothers aged <35 years who did not receive preventive care before and during delivery. We therefore recommend interventions to improve the efficiency of health care delivery to cater for this gap
Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury; does a Low Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Correlates with Neurological Status and Predict Early Outcome?
Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a devastating disease, hence the need to identify clinical and radiological injury features that predict neurological improvement.
Aims: The aim is to determine the correlations between American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in patients with TSCI and identify predictors of neurological improvement. Settings and Design: This is a prospective cohort study.
Subjects and Methods: Seventy-three patients with TSCI managed over a period of 18 months were studied. Neurological assessment of these patients was done at admission and 3-month post-injury using the AIS score form. The various MRI (0.3 Tesla Machine) features of these injuries were identified and measured using a RadiAnt DICOM Viewer 4.0.3 (64-bit).
Statistical Analysis: Correlation and regression analysis were done using Spearman’s rank correlation, and logistic regression, respectively. A P < 0.05 was used as the level of significance.
Results: Spinal cord edema (26.0%) and cord contusion (34.2%) were seen in most patients with incomplete injury, while spinal cord hemorrhage and transection were observed in patients with ASIA A injury. Asignificant correlation exists between maximum canal compromise (MCC) (ρ = −0.39, P < 0.001), maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC) (ρ = −0.44, P < 0.001), and length of spinal cord lesion (ρ = −0.77, P < 0.001) with AIS at admission. The independent predictors of AIS improvement include MSCC, MCC, length of spinal cord signal change, and cord contusion.
Conclusions: MRI features significantly correlate with the neurological status of TSCI and can be used to predict early neurological improvement in these patients
Recommended from our members
Controversies in orthopaedic oncology
Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting