Patient journey during and after a pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy:a cross-sectional patient registry study

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into the patient journey through a pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional patient registry study. SETTING: Online patient registry initiated by the Preeclampsia Foundation. PARTICIPANTS: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia enrolled in The Preeclampsia Registry (TPR). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Retrospective patient-reported experience measures concerning awareness of pre-eclampsia, timing and type of information on pre-eclampsia received, involvement in decision making regarding medical care, mental/emotional impact of the pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy and impact on future pregnancy planning. RESULTS: Of 3618 TPR-participants invited to complete the Patient Journey questionnaire, data from 833 (23%) responders were available for analysis. Most responders were white (n=795, 95.4%) and lived in the USA (n=728, 87.4%). Before their pre-eclampsia diagnosis, 599 (73.9%) responders were aware of the term ‘pre-eclampsia’, but only 348 (43.7%) were aware of its associated symptoms. Women with a lower level of education were less likely to have heard of pre-eclampsia (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62). Around the time of diagnosis, 29.2% of responders did not feel involved in the decision making, which was associated with reporting a serious mental/emotional impact of the pre-eclampsia experience (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.84). Over time, there was an increase in the proportion of women who were aware of the symptoms of pre-eclampsia (32.2% before 2011 to 52.5% after 2016; p<0.001) and in the proportion of responders stating they received counselling about the later-life health risks associated with pre-eclampsia (14.2% before 2011 to 25.6% after 2016; p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that improved patient education regarding pre-eclampsia is needed, that shared decision making is of great importance to patients to enhance their healthcare experience, and that healthcare providers should make efforts to routinely incorporate counselling about the later-life health risks associated with pre-eclampsia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02020174

A retrospective study on persistent pain after childbirth in the Netherlands

Reported prevalence rates of persistent postpartum pain (PPP) range from less than 1% to almost 20%. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of PPP in a Dutch cohort and to evaluate a possible causal role for specific risk factors on the development of chronic pain after childbirth. A questionnaire was sent to 960 postpartum women approximately 2 years after delivery. Primary outcome was pain that arose from childbirth at follow-up, and secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores. Tested risk factors included mode of labor analgesia, history of negative effect, history of chronic pain, delivery route, parity, and ethnicity. A total of 495 (51.6%) women participated. At a mean time of 2.3 postpartum years, 7.3% of women reported any pain and 6.1% reported significant pain related to the delivery. Compared to spontaneous delivery, cesarean delivery provided protection against persistent pain (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01–0.63, P<0.05). None of the other risk factors, including remifentanil use for labor pain, were of influence on the prevalence of persistent pain. Women with PPP experienced greater negative effects and had lower QoL scores compared to women without pain. In this cohort of Dutch patients, PPP is a serious problem with a great impact on the physical and mental health of women

Study protocol for a prospective cohort study to investigate Hemodynamic Adaptation to Pregnancy and Placenta-related Outcome: the HAPPO study

INTRODUCTION: The importance of cardiovascular health in relation to pregnancy outcome is increasingly acknowledged. Women who develop certain pregnancy complications, in particular preeclampsia, are at higher risk for future cardiovascular disease. Independent of its outcome, pregnancy requires a substantial adaptive response of the maternal cardiovascular system. In the Hemodynamic Adaptation to Pregnancy and Placenta-related Outcome (HAPPO) study, we aim to examine longitudinal maternal haemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy from the preconception period onwards. We hypothesise that women who will develop adverse pregnancy outcomes have impaired cardiovascular health before conception, leading to haemodynamic maladaptation to pregnancy and diminished uteroplacental vascular development. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this prospective cohort study embedded in the Rotterdam periconception cohort, 200 women with a history of placenta-related pregnancy complications (high-risk group) and 100 women with an uncomplicated obstetric history (low-risk group) will be included. At five moments (preconception, first, second and third trimester and postdelivery), women will undergo an extensive examination of the macrocirculatory and microcirculatory system and uteroplacental vascular development. The main outcome measures are differences in maternal haemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy between women with and without placenta-related pregnancy complications. In a multivariate linear mixed model, the relationship between maternal haemodynamic adaptive parameters, (utero)placental vascularisation indices and clinical outcomes (occurrence of pregnancy complications, embryonic and fetal growth trajectories, miscarriage rate, gestational age at delivery, birth weight) will be studied. Subgroup analysis will be performed to study baseline and trajectory differences between high-risk and low-risk women, independent of subsequent pregnancy outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (MEC 2018-150). Results will be disseminated to the medical community by publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific congresses. Also, patient associations will be informed and the public will be informed by dissemination through (social) media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7394 (www.trialregister.nl)

Patient-reported preconceptional characteristics in the prediction of recurrent preeclampsia

Objective: To develop a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia using patient-reported preconceptional characteristics, which can be used for risk stratification of subsequent pregnancies. Study design: Retrospective cohort study using data from The Preeclampsia Registry™ of 1028 women with a history of preeclampsia and at least one subsequent pregnancy. Main outcome measures: Candidate predictors were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis and a backward selection procedure was used to select the final predictors. Internal validation took place by internally validating the model in 500 simulated samples (bootstrapping), which provided a shrinkage factor to create the final model. This final model was evaluated for performance by a calibration plot and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Missing data was handled by multiple imputation. Results: Recurrent preeclampsia occurred in 467 (45.4%) women. Predictors in the final model were: a history of migraine, first degree relative with cardiovascular disease, first degree relative with placenta-related pregnancy complication, gestational age at delivery of index pregnancy, birthweight of the previous child, history of placental abruption, multiparity, chronic hypertension, interval between index and subsequent pregnancy, paternal non-white ethnicity and maternal age. AUC of the model was 0.63 (95% CI 0.59–0.66). In a subset of women who used aspirin prior or during their subsequent pregnancy, performance of the model was similar (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.50–0.71). Conclusions: In this study we developed a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia with moderate performance after internal validation. Early risk stratification of subsequent pregnancies that allows for customization of antenatal care and personalized prevention strategies, is not yet possible