The evolution of language: a comparative review

For many years the evolution of language has been seen as a disreputable topic, mired in fanciful "just so stories" about language origins. However, in the last decade a new synthesis of modern linguistics, cognitive neuroscience and neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory has begun to make important contributions to our understanding of the biology and evolution of language. I review some of this recent progress, focusing on the value of the comparative method, which uses data from animal species to draw inferences about language evolution. Discussing speech first, I show how data concerning a wide variety of species, from monkeys to birds, can increase our understanding of the anatomical and neural mechanisms underlying human spoken language, and how bird and whale song provide insights into the ultimate evolutionary function of language. I discuss the ‘‘descended larynx’ ’ of humans, a peculiar adaptation for speech that has received much attention in the past, which despite earlier claims is not uniquely human. Then I will turn to the neural mechanisms underlying spoken language, pointing out the difficulties animals apparently experience in perceiving hierarchical structure in sounds, and stressing the importance of vocal imitation in the evolution of a spoken language. Turning to ultimate function, I suggest that communication among kin (especially between parents and offspring) played a crucial but neglected role in driving language evolution. Finally, I briefly discuss phylogeny, discussing hypotheses that offer plausible routes to human language from a non-linguistic chimp-like ancestor. I conclude that comparative data from living animals will be key to developing a richer, more interdisciplinary understanding of our most distinctively human trait: language

Lichenometric dating (lichenometry) and the biology of the lichen genus rhizocarpon:challenges and future directions

Lichenometric dating (lichenometry) involves the use of lichen measurements to estimate the age of exposure of various substrata. Because of low radial growth rates and considerable longevity, species of the crustose lichen genus Rhizocarpon have been the most useful in lichenometry. The primary assumption of lichenometry is that colonization, growth and mortality of Rhizocarpon are similar on surfaces of known and unknown age so that the largest thalli present on the respective faces are of comparable age. This review describes the current state of knowledge regarding the biology of Rhizocarpon and considers two main questions: (1) to what extent does existing knowledge support this assumption; and (2) what further biological observations would be useful both to test its validity and to improve the accuracy of lichenometric dates? A review of the Rhizocarpon literature identified gaps in knowledge regarding early development, the growth rate/size curve, mortality, regeneration, competitive effects, colonization, and succession on rock surfaces. The data suggest that these processes may not be comparable on different rock surfaces, especially in regions where growth rates and thallus turnover are high. In addition, several variables could differ between rock surfaces and influence maximum thallus size, including rate and timing of colonization, radial growth rates, environmental differences, thallus fusion, allelopathy, thallus mortality, colonization and competition. Comparative measurements of these variables on surfaces of known and unknown age may help to determine whether the basic assumptions of lichenometry are valid. Ultimately, it may be possible to take these differences into account when interpreting estimated dates

Lichenometric studies on moraines in the Polar Urals

Lichenometry was used to study fluctuations of six glaciers in the Polar Urals over the last millennium (viz: IGAN, Obrucheva, Anuchina, Shumskogo, Avsiuka and Berga glaciers). In order to estimate the growth rate of Rhizocarpon subgenus Rhizocarpon lichens we used recently deglaciated surfaces as calibration sites. These sites, on glacier forelands, were dated using topographic maps, aerial photographs (from 1953, 1958, 1960, 1968, 1973, 1989), terrestrial photogrammetry, field photographs (from the 1960s to 2005), and satellite images (from 2000 and 2008). We also used pits and quarries abandoned between the 1940s–1980s and a road built in the early 1980s as calibration sites. Optimum diametral growth rates of Rhizocarpon subgenus Rhizocarpon are estimated by the new curve to be c. 0.25 mm/year for the last 100 years, assuming linear growth as deduced from the shape of other curves from northern Scandinavia. Due to the lack of old control points we used a reconstructed mass balance curve (from 1816 to 2008) to indirectly constrain the age of pre-twentieth-century moraines. The following moraine groups were identified near the modern fronts of glaciers: ablation moraines de-glaciated during the last 40 to 60 years; lateral moraines formed in the early twentieth century (largest lichen diameter (DLL) = 20 mm), ice-cored moraines, probably from the 1880s (DLL= 24–26 mm); moraines probably deposited in the middle of the nineteenth century and c. 200 years ago (DLL= 30–33 mm and 44–47 mm, respectively); as well as several more ancient moraines (DLL= 70 mm, 90 mm and 110–153 mm) deposited during glacier advances of almost identical extent. According to our tentative lichenometric-age estimates most moraines were formed during the last 450 years – consistent with upper tree-limit altitude variations previously identified for this region. Glacier fluctuations in the Polar Urals are in agreement with tree-ring based reconstructions of summer temperature spanning the last millennium, and are also in tune with glacier behaviour elsewhere in the Northern Hemisphere