62 research outputs found

    The Misuse of Terrorism Prosecution in Chile: The Need for Discrete Consideration of Minority and Indigenous Group Treatment in Rule of Law Analyses

    Get PDF
    The Mapuche of South America have long struggled to maintain control over their ancestral lands, territory that now falls under the sovereign domain of Argentina and Chile. Since Chilean independence in the 19th century, the relationship between the Mapuche and the Chilean government has ranged between full-blown conflict and various forms of compromise and accommodation. However, over the past few decades, the Chilean government\u27s economic interests in Mapuche lands have grown significantly and the government has seized control of significant portions of the lands. The Mapuche have consistently resisted the government\u27s encroachment on their lands and have protested through both violent and non-violent means. Faced with mounting pressure from government and business interests to quell Mapuche opposition, the Chilean government recently turned to an archaic terrorism statute left over from the Pinochet regime. By prosecuting Mapuche defendants under the terrorism statute, the government was able to bypass procedural protections afforded to non-Mapuche defendants accused of similar conduct under the ordinary criminal code. This comment argues that the Chilean government\u27s misuse of the terrorism statute exemplifies the need for discrete consideration of indigenous and minority group treatment when analyzing whether a country conforms to rule of law principles. Minority and indigenous groups are most vulnerable to breakdowns in the rule of law, a reality that is only amplified by the current geopolitical climate of counterterrorism. Therefore, the comment argues that rule of law analyses, by considering the particular vulnerability of indigenous and minority populations, can play a pivotal role in striking the proper balance between counterterrorism and human rights

    The Misuse of Terrorism Prosecution in Chile: The Need for Discrete Consideration of Minority and Indigenous Group Treatment in Rule of Law Analyses

    Get PDF
    The Mapuche of South America have long struggled to maintain control over their ancestral lands, territory that now falls under the sovereign domain of Argentina and Chile. Since Chilean independence in the 19th century, the relationship between the Mapuche and the Chilean government has ranged between full-blown conflict and various forms of compromise and accommodation. However, over the past few decades, the Chilean government\u27s economic interests in Mapuche lands have grown significantly and the government has seized control of significant portions of the lands. The Mapuche have consistently resisted the government\u27s encroachment on their lands and have protested through both violent and non-violent means. Faced with mounting pressure from government and business interests to quell Mapuche opposition, the Chilean government recently turned to an archaic terrorism statute left over from the Pinochet regime. By prosecuting Mapuche defendants under the terrorism statute, the government was able to bypass procedural protections afforded to non-Mapuche defendants accused of similar conduct under the ordinary criminal code. This comment argues that the Chilean government\u27s misuse of the terrorism statute exemplifies the need for discrete consideration of indigenous and minority group treatment when analyzing whether a country conforms to rule of law principles. Minority and indigenous groups are most vulnerable to breakdowns in the rule of law, a reality that is only amplified by the current geopolitical climate of counterterrorism. Therefore, the comment argues that rule of law analyses, by considering the particular vulnerability of indigenous and minority populations, can play a pivotal role in striking the proper balance between counterterrorism and human rights

    Analysis and Empirical Testing of Income Smoothing Using Discretionary Accounting Changes

    No full text
    One way to smooth earnings is to use accounting changes. This paper focuses on discretionary accounting changes as the smoothing device used by firms. This paper tests for smoothing behavior as a function of incentives. The association between the smoothing behavior displayed within a sample of firms and firm-specific explanatory variables is examined

    Street Food Vending in Vancouver: An Opportunity for Local Economic Development

    No full text
    This report is about the City of Vancouver’s street food vending policy. It looks at the challenges and opportunities faced by the City in its effort to expand the types of food, the nutritious content and the geographical distribution of street food sold on the streets. The report offers a view of the stakeholders and regulations that shape the activity. It provides recommendations for future policy changes which would enable the expansion of the types of food sold on the street while arguing the benefits this program would offer as a local economic development strategy to encourage the involvement of entrepreneurs from low income segments of the population of Vancouver.Applied Science, Faculty ofCommunity and Regional Planning (SCARP), School ofUnreviewedGraduat
    • …
    corecore