Prophylactic mesh placement for the prevention of incisional hernia in high-risk patients after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectives: In high-risk populations, the efficacy of mesh placement in incisional hernia (IH) prevention after elective abdominal surgeries has been supported by many published studies. This meta-analysis aimed at providing comprehensive and updated clinical implications of prophylactic mesh placement (PMP) for the prevention of IH as compared to primary suture closure (PSC).Materials and methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically searched until March 3, 2020, for studies comparing the efficacy of PMP to PSC in abdominal surgeries. The main outcome of interest was the incidence of IH at different follow-up durations. All statistical analyses were carried out using Review Manager version 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) and Stata 11.0 (Stata Corporation LP, College Station, TX). The data were pooled using the random-effects model, and odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: A total of 3,330 were identified initially and after duplicate removal and exclusion based on title and abstract, 26 studies comprising 3,000 patients, were included. The incidence of IH was significantly reduced for PMP at follow-up periods of one year (OR= 0.16 [0.05, 0.51]; p=0.002; I2=77%), two years (OR= 0.23 [0.12, 0.45]; p\u3c0.0001; I2=68%), three years (OR= 0.30 [0.16, 0.59]; p=0.0004; I2= 52%), and five years (OR=0.15 [0.03, 0.85]; p=0.03; I2=87%). However, PMP was associated with an increased risk of seroma (OR=1.67 [1.10, 2.55]; p= 0.02; I2=19%) and chronic wound pain (OR=1.71 [1.03, 2.83]; p= 0.04; I2= 0%). No significant difference between the PMP and PSC groups was noted for postoperative hematoma (OR= 1.04 [0.43, 2.50]; p=0.92; I2=0%), surgical site infection (OR=1.09 [0.78, 1.52]; p= 0.62; I2=12%), wound dehiscence (OR=0.69 [0.30, 1.62]; p=0.40; I2= 0%), gastrointestinal complications (OR= 1.40 [0.76, 2.58]; p=0.28; I2= 0%), length of hospital stay (WMD= -0.49 [-1.45, 0.48]; p=0.32; I2=0%), and operating time (WMD=9.18 [-7.17, 25.54]; p= 0.27; I2=80%).Conclusions: PMP has been effective in reducing the rate of IH in the high-risk population at all time intervals, but it is associated with an increased risk of seroma and chronic wound pain. The benefits of mesh largely outweigh the risk, and it is linked with positive outcomes in high-risk patients

The ITMIG/IASLC thymic epithelial tumors staging project: A proposed lymph node map for thymic epithelial tumors in the forthcoming 8th edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors

Although the presence of nodal disease is prognostic in thymic malignancy, the significance of the extent of nodal disease has yet to be defined. Lymph node dissection has not been routinely performed, and there is currently no node map defined for thymic malignancy. To establish a universal language for reporting as well as characterize the staging of this disease more accurately, an empiric node map is proposed here. This was developed using prior classification systems, series reporting specifics of nodal involvement, anatomical studies of lymphatic drainage, and preexisting node maps of the chest as defined by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the neck as defined by the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery and the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery. The development of this node map was a joint effort by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group and the Thymic Domain of the IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee. It was reviewed and subsequently approved by the members of ITMIG. This map will be used as an adjunct to define node staging as part of a universal stage classification for thymic malignancy. As more data are gathered using definitions set forth by this node map, a revision may be undertaken in the future.0SCOPUS: ar.jSCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Factors associated with safe and successful postoperative day 1 discharge after lung operations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: A shorter length of stay (LOS) is associated with fewer hospital-acquired adverse conditions and decreased utilization of hospital resources. While modern perioperative care protocols have enabled some ambitious surgical teams to achieve discharge as early as within postoperative day 1 (POD1), most other teams remain cautious about such an approach due to the perceived risk of missing postoperative complications and increased readmission rates. We aimed to identify factors that would help guide surgical teams aiming for safe and successful POD1 discharge after lung resection.Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL databases for articles comparing perioperative characteristics in patients discharged within POD1 (DWPOD1) and after POD1 (DAPOD1) following lung resection. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.Results: We included eight retrospective cohort studies with a total of 216,887 patients, of which 22,250 (10.3%) patients were DWPOD1. Our meta-analysis showed that younger patients, those without cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities, and those with better preoperative pulmonary function are more likely to qualify for DWPOD1. Certain operative factors, such as a minimally invasive approach, shorter operations, and sublobar resections, also favor DWPOD1. DWPOD1 appears to be safe, with comparable 30-day mortality and readmission rates, and significantly less postoperative morbidity than DAPOD1.Conclusions: In select patients with a favorable preoperative profile, DWPOD1 after lung resection can be achieved successfully and without increased risk of adverse outcomes such as postoperative morbidity, mortality, or readmissions

Advances in tracheal reconstruction and tissue engineering

Tracheal stenosis represents a significant challenge. Surgeons continue to search for appropriate reconstructive techniques and grafting materials for long tracheal segment reconstruction. Grafts can be classified as synthetic, allogenic, autogenic, transplant, and engineered. Although none of these grafts have provided overwhelming success, acellular composite engineered grafts have shown early promise and can be applied in benign and malignant tracheal diseases. Intraluminal granulation tissue causing re-stenosis is the biggest challenge in tracheal reconstruction. Tracheal wound healing and tissue regeneration pathways must be deeply explored and better characterized to advance the field of tracheal reconstruction

Thoracoscore predicts midterm mortality in patients undergoing thoracic surgery

Objective: Thoracoscore is the first multivariate model for the prediction of in-hospital mortality after general thoracic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the performance of Thoracoscore in predicting in-hospital and midterm all-cause mortality. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1675 patients who underwent thoracic surgery ( lung resections [n = 626], mediastinum [n = 535], pleura and pericardium [n = 268], esophagus [n = 88], chest wall [n = 90], trachea [n = 45], and other procedures [n = 23]) from October 2002 to March 2006 at a single institution. Midterm survival data (mean follow-up 25 +/- 16 months) were obtained from the National Death Index. Kaplan-Meier survival plots of the quartiles of Thoracoscore were constructed and compared with the log-rank test with adjustment for trend. Results: Starting from the lower-risk to the higher-risk quartile, the in-hospital mortality rates were 0% (0/418), 1% (4/415), 2.5% (11/435), and 9.6% (54/407). Thoracoscore was a strong independent predictor for in-hospital mortality ( odds ratio 1.20, 95% confidence intervals 1.15-.25; P < .001). The 2-year survivals of the Thoracoscore quartiles were 98.7% +/- 0.6%, 87.0% +/- 1.8%, 73.8% +/- 2.3%, and 54.8% +/- 2.7%, respectively (P < .0001). Thoracoscore was a strong independent predictor for midterm mortality (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence intervals 1.11-1.14; P < .001). Conclusion: Thoracoscore is a good and useful clinical tool for preoperative prediction of in-hospital and midterm mortality among patients undergoing general thoracic surgery

Successes and failures in tracheal bioengineering: Lessons learned

Background: Controversy in tracheal reconstruction using grafts and bioengineered constructs highlights the importance of animal studies before human application. Small animal models help to refine designs, but do not adequately model sizes relevant to human anatomy. We have conducted extensive large animal studies and summarize our findings in 26 consecutive transplants.Methods: We pooled 26 large animal studies together to investigate common elements related to successes and failures. In general, the engineered tracheal graft consisted of a decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) surgical patch supported by a 3D printed plastic polymer scaffold. Circumferential graft coverage ranged from 50% to 100%, spanning the length of 4-6 tracheal rings. Some grafts included embedded stem cells. Control grafts were fabricated without the support scaffold. At death, grafts were harvested and examined grossly and through histology.Results: The support scaffold prevented graft malacia and collapse. Luminal epithelialization was most extensive in grafts with smaller circumferential coverage. Smaller circumferential coverage was also associated with longest animal survival. Chondrogenesis was only observed in grafts with embedded stem cells. Survival time was shortest in 100% circumferential grafts. Granulation tissue was an issue for all graft designs.Conclusions: Large animal models capture challenges and complexities relevant to human anatomy. Development of granulation tissue remains a challenge, especially in circumferential grafts. Significant additional research is needed to investigate granulation tissue formation and to provide actionable insight into its management

Novel journal metrics in cardiothoracic surgery: How different are contemporary metrics from the impact factor?

Objective: Despite shortcomings, impact factor (IF) remains the gold standard metric for journal quality. However, novel metrics including the h-index, g-index, and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS; mentions in mainstream/social media) are gaining traction. We assessed correlations between these metrics among cardiothoracic surgery journals.Methods: For all cardiothoracic surgery journals with a 2021 Clarivate IF (N = 20), the 2-year IF (2019 to 2020) and 5-year IF (2016 to 2020), h-index, and g-index were obtained. Two-year journal-level AAS (2019 to 2020) was also calculated. Journal Twitter presence and activity was sourced from Twitter and the Twitter application programming interface. Correlations were assessed using Spearman correlation, and coefficients of determination were calculated.Results: IF demonstrated a moderate-strong positive correlation with the h-index (rs = 0.48 to 0.77) and g-index (rs = 0.49 to 0.79) and a moderate correlation with AAS (rs = 0.53 to 0.58). The 2-year IF accounted for 25% to 49% of variability in the h-index, 27% to 55% of variability in the g-index, and 32% of variability in the AAS. Among journals with a Twitter account (N = 10), IF was strongly correlated with Twitter following (rs = 0.81 to 0.86), which was in turn strongly correlated with journal AAS (rs = 0.79). Article-level AAS was moderately correlated with citation count (rs = 0.47).Conclusions: IF accounted for only between 25% and 55% of variability in the h-index and g-index, indicating that these newer metrics measure unique dimensions of citation-based impact. Thus, the academic community must familiarize itself with these newer journal metrics. Social media attention may be associated with scholarly impact, although further work is needed to understand these relationships