7 research outputs found

    Anal cancer chemoradiotherapy outcome prediction using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and clinicopathological factors

    No full text
    Objective: To assess the role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), obtained before and during chemoradiotherapy, in predicting locoregional failure relative to clinicopathological factors for patients with anal cancer. Methods: 93 patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy were included in a prospective observational study (NCT01937780). FDG-PET/CT was performed for all patients before treatment, and for a subgroup (n = 39) also 2 weeks into treatment. FDG-PET was evaluated with standardized uptake values (SUVmax/peak/mean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and a proposed Z-normalized combination of MTV and SUVpeak (ZMP). The objective was to predict locoregional failure using FDG-PET, tumor and lymph node stage, gross tumor volume (GTV) and human papilloma virus (HPV) status in univariate and bivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: N3 lymph node stage, HPV negative tumor, GTV, MTV, TLG and ZMP were in univariate analysis significant predictors of locoregional failure (p 0.2). In bivariate analysis HPV status was the most independent predictor in combinations with N3 stage, ZMP, TLG, and MTV (p < 0.02). The FDG-PET parameters at 2 weeks into radiotherapy decreased by 30–40 % of the initial values, but neither absolute nor relative decrease improved the prediction models. Conclusion: Pre-treatment PET parameters are predictive of chemoradiotherapy outcome in anal cancer, although HPV negativity and N3 stage are the strongest single predictors. Predictions can be improved by combining HPV with PET parameters such as MTV, TLG or ZMP. PET 2 weeks into treatment does not provide added predictive value. Advances in knowledge: Pre-treatment PET parameters of anal cancer showed a predictive role independent of clinicopathological factors. Although the PET parameters show substantial reduction from pre- to mid-treatment, the changes were not predictive of chemoradiotherapy outcome

    Fundus Autofluorescence Change as an Early Indicator of Treatment Effect of Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanomas

    No full text
    Background: Early confirmation of the effect of brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma showing that tumour coverage is valuable. The irradiated retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) commonly develops atrophy. This study compares the fundus autofluorescence (AF) changes to the development of RPE atrophy following brachytherapy. Methods: Retrospective study of 19 patients treated with 106Ru and 2 with 125I plaques with either a 3- or 6-month follow-up period. Ultra-widefield (UW) composite colour and AF images were obtained with Optomap 200Tx and interpreted as complete, partial, or no RPE changes and complete or partial hyperautofluorescence, hypoautofluorescence, or isoautofluorescence. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, 9 of 13 patients (69%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.389–0.896) treated with 106Ru plaques developed complete homogenous hyperautofluorescence surrounding the tumour, but only 1 of 13 (8%) (95% CI, 0.004–0.379) developed complete RPE atrophy at the same time point. Six patients in the 106Ru plaque group had their first follow-up with UW imaging at 6 months. Four of them developed homogenous hyperautofluorescence and none developed complete RPE atrophy around the tumour. The 2 patients treated with 125I did not demonstrate any clear RPE or AF changes. Conclusion: The effect of 106Ru plaque treatment on fundus UW imaging is detected as homogenous and well-demarcated hyperautofluorescence before visible RPE atrophy

    Positron emission tomography guided dose painting by numbers of lung cancer:Alanine dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dose painting by numbers (DPBN) require a high degree of dose modulation to fulfill the image-based voxel wise dose prescription. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric accuracy of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography((18)F-FDG-PET)-based DPBN in an anthropomorphic lung phantom using alanine dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A linear dose prescription based on (18)F-FDG-PET image intensities within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of a lung cancer patient was employed. One DPBN scheme with low dose modulation (Scheme A; minimum/maximum fraction dose to the GTV 2.92/4.26 Gy) and one with a high modulation (Scheme B; 2.81/4.52 Gy) were generated. The plans were transferred to a computed tomograpy (CT) scan of a thorax phantom based on CT images of the patient. Using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), DPBN was delivered to the phantom with embedded alanine dosimeters. A plan was also delivered to an intentionally misaligned phantom. Absorbed doses at various points in the phantom were measured by alanine dosimetry. RESULTS: A pointwise comparison between GTV doses from prescription, treatment plan calculation and VMAT delivery showed high correspondence, with a mean and maximum dose difference of <0.1 Gy and 0.3 Gy, respectively. No difference was found in dosimetric accuracy between scheme A and B. The misalignment caused deviations up to 1 Gy between prescription and delivery. CONCLUSION: DPBN can be delivered with high accuracy, showing that the treatment may be applied correctly from a dosimetric perspective. Still, misalignment may cause considerable dosimetric erros, indicating the need for patient immobilization and monitoring

    Positron emission tomography guided dose painting by numbers of lung cancer: Alanine dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom

    No full text
    Background and purpose: Dose painting by numbers (DPBN) require a high degree of dose modulation to fulfill the image-based voxel wise dose prescription. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric accuracy of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography(18F-FDG-PET)-based DPBN in an anthropomorphic lung phantom using alanine dosimetry. Materials and methods: A linear dose prescription based on 18F-FDG-PET image intensities within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of a lung cancer patient was employed. One DPBN scheme with low dose modulation (Scheme A; minimum/maximum fraction dose to the GTV 2.92/4.26 Gy) and one with a high modulation (Scheme B; 2.81/4.52 Gy) were generated. The plans were transferred to a computed tomograpy (CT) scan of a thorax phantom based on CT images of the patient. Using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), DPBN was delivered to the phantom with embedded alanine dosimeters. A plan was also delivered to an intentionally misaligned phantom. Absorbed doses at various points in the phantom were measured by alanine dosimetry. Results: A pointwise comparison between GTV doses from prescription, treatment plan calculation and VMAT delivery showed high correspondence, with a mean and maximum dose difference of <0.1 Gy and 0.3 Gy, respectively. No difference was found in dosimetric accuracy between scheme A and B. The misalignment caused deviations up to 1 Gy between prescription and delivery. Conclusion: DPBN can be delivered with high accuracy, showing that the treatment may be applied correctly from a dosimetric perspective. Still, misalignment may cause considerable dosimetric erros, indicating the need for patient immobilization and monitoring
    corecore