Worse prognosis of osteosarcoma patients expressing IGF-1 on a tissue microarray

BACKGROUND It is hardly possible to define osteosarcoma (OS) patients at greatest risk for non-response to chemotherapy, metastasis and short survival times. Our goal was the investigation of local expression of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) with regard to survival time of OS patients using a tissue microarray (TMA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Tumor tissue specimens from surgical primary tumor resections were collected from patients with OS. A TMA was composed, sections were stained with rabbit anti-IGF-1 and grading was performed. Statistics involved Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS We analyzed immunohistochemical expression of local IGF-1 on a TMA based on surgical primary tumor resections of 67 OS patients. The mean clinical follow-up time was 98 months. Twenty-two (33%) OS patients stained negatively and 44 (66%) OS patients stained positively for IGF-1. Significantly shorter survival was detected with expression of IGF-1 (p=0.007). The 5-year survival rate for patients expressing IGF-1 was 63% compared to 92% in patients without expression of IGF-1. Non-responders to chemotherapy and patients with metastasis, who also stained positively for IGF-1 manifested a significantly (p=0.002 and p<0.0001, respectively) shorter survival. CONCLUSION Expression of local IGF-1 in primary tumor tissue appears to significantly affect the aggressiveness of OS, may predict survival time and, above all, may discriminate patients with non-response to chemotherapy and metastasis. This represents the basis for successful patient selection with regard to the decision process for or against chemotherapy and the choice of the most effective therapeutic drug. It may be a more important marker of tumor progression and indicator of prognosis than serum IGF-1. Novel tumor markers and therapeutic agents targeting the local IGF-1 pathway may increase the likelihood of therapeutic success

Foscan and Foslip based photodynamic therapy in osteosarcoma in vitro and in intratibial mouse models

Current osteosarcoma therapies cause severe treatment-related side effects and chemoresistance, and have low success rates. Consequently, alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive, local therapy with proven clinical efficacy for a variety of tumor types. PDT is cytotoxic, provokes anti-vascular effects and stimulates tumor cell targeting mechanisms of the immune system and, consequently, has potential as a novel therapy for osteosarcoma patients. This study investigated the uptake and the dark- and phototoxicity and cytotoxic mechanisms of the photosensitizer (PS) 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(meta-hydroxyphenyl) chlorine (mTHPC, Foscan) and a liposomal mTHPC formulation (Foslip) in the human 143B and a mouse K7M2-derived osteosaroma cell line (K7M2L2) in vitro. Secondly the tumor- and metastasis-suppressive efficacies of mTHPC formulations based PDT and associated mechanisms in intratibial, metastasizing osteosarcoma mouse models (143B/SCID and syngeneic K7M2L2/BALB/c) were studied. The uptake of Foscan and Foslip in vitro was time- and dose-dependent and resulted in mTHPC and light dose-dependent phototoxicity associated with apoptosis. In vivo, the uptake of both i.v. administered mTHPC formulations was higher in tumor than in healthy control tissue. PDT caused significant (Foscan P<0.05, Foslip P<0.001) tumor growth inhibition in both models. A significant (Foscan P<0.001, Foslip P<0.001) immunsystem-dependent suppression of lung metastasis was only observed in the K7M2L2/BALB/c model and was associated with a marked infiltration of T-lymphocytes at the primary tumor site. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Expression of MSH2 and MSH6 on a Tissue Microarray in Patients with Osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND/AIM: Reliable prognostic factors for the outcome of patients with osteosarcoma (OS) remain elusive. We analyzed the relationship between immunohistochemical expression of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, MutS protein homolog 2 (MSH2) and MSH6 using a tissue microarray (TMA) with respect to OS patient demographics and survival time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved tumor tissue specimens from bone tissue originating from surgical primary tumor specimens of OS patients to generate a TMA and stained sections with antibodies against MSH2 and MSH6. RESULTS: Tumor resections of 67 patients with a mean follow-up of 98 months were evaluated. MSH2 was expressed in nine (13%), MSH6 in ten (15%) and combined MSH2 and MSH6 (MSH2/6) in six (9%) patients. Significantly shorter survival times were associated with expression of MSH6, MSH2/6, as well as simultaneous non-response to chemotherapy and presence of metastasis. CONCLUSION: The survival time of patients with OS may be predicted by local expression of MSH6 and MSH2/6 in surgical primary tumor resections. This study shows the prognostic value of the local expression of DNA MMR proteins, as markers for poor prognosis of OS patients

Evaluation of intraarterial and intravenous cisplatin chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma using an orthotopic xenograft mouse model

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of bone. Its treatment relies on the administration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery. Alternative to common intravenous (i.v.) administration of chemotherapeutic drugs, clinical studies also evaluated the benefit of intraarterial (i.a.) administrations. However, conflicting results were obtained when both routes of administration of cisplatin (CDDP), a gold standard drug in osteosarcoma treatment, were compared. In order to overcome clinical confounding factors, we evaluated both routes of drug administration in a mouse model of experimental osteosarcoma. METHODS: We directly compared i.v. versus i.a. drug infusions of cisplatin (CDDP), in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model of metastatic osteosarcoma. We performed tumor monitoring using caliper and micro computed tomography and measured tumor perfusion using laser speckle contrast imaging. Histopathological changes were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining as well as immunohistochemistry (cleaved PARP-1, CD31, HIF-1α). RESULTS: First, an effective concentration of 4 mg/kg i.a. CDDP was determined that significantly reduced primary tumor volume. We used this concentration of i.a. CDDP and compared it to infusions of i.v. CDDP. Systemic (i.v.) CDDP only showed minor suppression of tumor growth whereas local (i.a.) CDDP strongly inhibited tumor growth and destruction of cortical bone in the tumor-bearing hind limb. Inhibition of tumor growth was linked to a reduced blood perfusion and resulted in increased amounts of tumor necrosis after i.a. CDDP. After treatment with i.a. CDDP, remaining viable tumor tissue responded by increasing expression of HIF-1α. Side effects due to administration of CDDP were minor, showing no differences in kidney damage between i.v. and i.a. CDDP. However, increased epidermal apoptosis in the foot was an indirect marker for locally increased concentrations of CDDP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the great potential of local administration of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, such as CDDP. Consequently, we provide a preclinical basis for a renewed interest in the clinical use of i.a. chemotherapy in osteosarcoma therapy

Prognostic value of tumor suppressors in osteosarcoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Primary bone cancers are among the deadliest cancer types in adolescents, with osteosarcomas being the most prevalent form. Osteosarcomas are commonly treated with multi-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy and therapy success as well as patient survival is affected by the presence of tumor suppressors. In order to assess the prognostic value of tumor-suppressive biomarkers, primary osteosarcoma tissues were analyzed prior to and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS We constructed a tissue microarray from high grade osteosarcoma samples, consisting of 48 chemotherapy naïve biopsies (BXs) and 47 tumor resections (RXs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We performed immunohistochemical stainings of P53, P16, maspin, PTEN, BMI1 and Ki67, characterized the subcellular localization and related staining outcome with chemotherapy response and overall survival. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to analyze chemotherapy response and Kaplan-Meier-analysis as well as the Cox proportional hazards model was applied for analysis of patient survival. RESULTS No significant associations between biomarker expression in BXs and patient survival or chemotherapy response were detected. In univariate analysis, positive immunohistochemistry of P53 (P = 0.008) and P16 (P16; P = 0.033) in RXs was significantly associated with poor survival prognosis. In addition, presence of P16 in RXs was associated with poor survival in multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.003; HR = 0.067) while absence of P16 was associated with good chemotherapy response (P = 0.004; OR = 74.076). Presence of PTEN on tumor RXs was significantly associated with an improved survival prognosis (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS Positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) of P16 and P53 in RXs was indicative for poor overall patient survival whereas positive IHC of PTEN was prognostic for good overall patient survival. In addition, we found that P16 might be a marker of osteosarcoma chemotherapy resistance. Therefore, our study supports the use of tumor RXs to assess the prognostic value of biomarkers

Prognostic value and in vitro biological relevance of Neuropilin 1 and Neuropilin 2 in osteosarcoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma increased the long-term survival of patients with localized disease considerably but metastasizing osteosarcoma remained largely treatment resistant. Neuropilins, transmembrane glycoproteins, are important receptors for VEGF dependent hyper-vascularization in tumor angiogenesis and their aberrant expression promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in many solid tumors. Our analysis of Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and Neuropilin-2 (NRP2) immunostaining in a tissue microarray of 66 osteosarcoma patients identified NRP2 as an indicator of poor overall, metastasis-free and progression free survival while NRP1 had no predictive value. Patients with tumors that expressed NRP2 in the absence of NRP1 had a significantly worse prognosis than NRP1(-)/NRP2(-), NRP1(+) or NRP1(+)/NRP2(+) tumors. Moreover, patients with overt metastases and with NRP2-positive primary tumors had a significantly shorter survival rate than patients with metastases but NRP2-negative tumors. Furthermore, the expression of both NRP1 and NRP2 in osteosarcoma cell lines correlated to a variable degree with the metastatic potential of the respective cell line. To address the functional relevance of Neuropilins for VEGF signaling we used shRNA mediated down-regulation and blocking antibodies of NRP1 and NRP2 in the metastatic 143B and HuO9-M132 cell lines. In 143B cells, VEGFA signaling monitored by AKT phosphorylation was more inhibited by blocking of NRP1, whereas in HuO9-M132 cells NRP2 blocking was more effective indicating that NRP1 and NRP2 can substitute each other in the functional interaction with VEGFR1. Altogether, these data point to NRP2 as a powerful prognostic marker in osteosarcoma and together with NRP1 as a novel target for tumor-suppressive therapy

Reaction of Fe3(CO)12 with Octreotide – Chemical, Electrochemical and Biological Investigations

In search for peptidic [FeFe] hydrogenase mimics the cyclic disulfide sandostatin® (octreotide) was allowed to react with Fe3(CO)12. An Fe2(CO)6 complex was isolated and characterized spectroscopically and by elemental and thermochemical analysis. The complex catalyzes the electrochemical reduction of H+ to H2. It is suggested by radioligand binding assays that the complex retains ca. 10% of the binding affinity for the GCPRs hsstr1-5 of somatostatin

Altered CXCL12 expression reveals a dual role of CXCR4 in osteosarcoma primary tumor growth and metastasis

PURPOSE Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of metastasis-the major cause of death in osteosarcoma (OS)-is a key for the development of more effective metastasis-suppressive therapy. Here, we investigated the biological relevance of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in OS. METHODS We interfered with CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in CXCR4-expressing human 143-B OS cells through stable expression of CXCL12, of its competitive antagonist P2G, or of CXCL12-KDEL, designed to retain CXCR4 within the cell. Intratibial OS xenograft mouse model metastasizing to the lung was used to assess tumorigenic and metastatic potential of the manipulated cell lines. RESULTS Constitutive expression of native CXCL12 promoted lung metastasis without affecting tumor growth. Stable expression of P2G or CXCL12-KDEL significantly accelerated tumor growth but diminished lung metastasis. Tumors grown from P2G- or CXCL12-KDEL-expressing cells contained higher levels of CXCR4-encoding mRNA going along with a higher percentage of CXCR4-expressing tumor cells. Lung metastases of all groups were predominantly enriched with CXCR4-expressing tumor cells. CONCLUSION Higher abundance of CXCR4 possibly contributed to increased local retention of tumor cells by bone marrow-derived CXCL12, reflected in the increased primary tumor growth and decreased number of lung metastases in P2G and CXCL12-KDEL groups. Higher percentage of CXCR4-expressing lung metastatic cells compared to the corresponding primary tumors point to important functions of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in late steps of metastasis. In conclusion, based on the here reported results, local treatment of lung metastases with novel CXCR4-targeting therapeutics might be considered and favored over anti-CXCR4 systemic therapy