An Overview of Feline Heartworm Disease

Heartworm disease was previously considered a serious clinical problem only in dogs. Recently, however, the incidence of feline heartworm disease appears to be increasing. Factors contributing to this include increased awareness by veterinarians, a wide host preference by the vector, and the realization that host specificity of Dirofilaria immitis was less than previously thought. The diagnosis offeline heartworm disease can be challenging. Several diagnostic tools are available, however. The purpose of this report is to present an overview of feline heartworm disease with special emphasis on its diagnosis and treatment

Changes in Physician Antipsychotic Prescribing Preferences, 2002–2007

Objective Physician antipsychotic prescribing behavior may be influenced by comparative effectiveness evidence, regulatory warnings, and formulary and other restrictions on these drugs. This study measured changes in the degree to which physicians are able to customize treatment choices and changes in physician preferences for specific agents after these events. Methods The study used 2002–2007 prescribing data from the IMS Health Xponent database and data on physician characteristics from the American Medical Association for a longitudinal cohort of 7,399 physicians. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were conducted of the concentration of prescribing (physician-level Herfindahl index) and preferences for and likelihood of prescribing two first-generation antipsychotics and six second-generation antipsychotics. Analyses adjusted for prescribing volume, specialty, demographic characteristics, practice setting, and education. Results Antipsychotic prescribing was highly concentrated at the physician level, with a mean unadjusted Herfindahl index of .33 in 2002 and .29 in 2007. Psychiatrists reduced the concentration of their prescribing more over time than did other physicians. High-volume psychiatrists had a Herfindahl index that was half that of low-volume physicians in other specialties (.18 versus .36), a difference that remained significant (p<.001) after adjustment for physician characteristics. The share of physicians preferring olanzapine dropped from 29.9% in 2002 to 10.3% in 2007 (p<.001) while the share favoring quetiapine increased from 9.4% to 44.5% (p<.001). Few physicians (<5%) preferred a first-generation antipsychotic in 2002 or 2007. Conclusions Preferences for specific antipsychotics changed dramatically during this period. Although physician prescribing remained heavily concentrated, the concentration decreased over time, particularly among psychiatrists.National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (Grant R01MH093359)National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (Grant P30 MH090333)National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (Grant R01MH087488)Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Grant R01HS017695)Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Investigator Award in Health Policy Research

How Quickly Do Physicians Adopt New Drugs? The Case of Second-Generation Antipsychotics

Objective The authors examined physician adoption of second-generation antipsychotic medications and identified physician-level factors associated with early adoption. Methods The authors estimated Cox proportional-hazards models of time to adoption of nine second-generation antipsychotics by 30,369 physicians who prescribed antipsychotics between 1996 and 2008, when the drugs were first introduced, and analyzed the total number of agents prescribed during that time. The models were adjusted for physicians’ specialty, demographic characteristics, education and training, practice setting, and prescribing volume. Data were from IMS Xponent, which captures over 70% of all prescriptions filled in the United States, and the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Results On average, physicians waited two or more years before prescribing new second-generation antipsychotics, but there was substantial heterogeneity across products in time to adoption. General practitioners were much slower than psychiatrists to adopt second-generation antipsychotics (hazard ratios (HRs) range .10−.35), and solo practitioners were slower than group practitioners to adopt most products (HR range .77−.89). Physicians with the highest antipsychotic-prescribing volume adopted second-generation antipsychotics much faster than physicians with the lowest volume (HR range .15−.39). Psychiatrists tended to prescribe a broader set of antipsychotics (median=6) than general practitioners and neurologists (median=2) and pediatricians (median=1). Conclusions As policy makers search for ways to control rapid health spending growth, understanding the factors that influence physician adoption of new medications will be crucial in the efforts to maximize the value of care received by individuals with mental disorders as well as to improve medication safety.National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (R01 MH093359)Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Investigator Award in Health Policy Research)Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS017695)National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) ((NIMH) R34 MH082682)National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) ((NIMH) P30 MH090333)National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) ((NIMH) R01 MH087488)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (0915674

Regional Variation in Physician Adoption of Antipsychotics: Impact on US Medicare expenditures

Background—Regional variation in US Medicare prescription drug spending is driven by higher prescribing of costly brand-name drugs in some regions. This variation likely arises from differences in the speed of diffusion of newly-approved medications. Second-generation antipsychotics were widely adopted for treatment of severe mental illness and for several off-label uses. Rapid diffusion of new psychiatric drugs likely increases drug spending but its relationship to non-drug spending is unclear. The impact of antipsychotic diffusion on drug and medical spending is of great interest to public payers like Medicare, which finance a majority of mental health spending in the U.S.National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (R01 MH093359

Expressions 1979

Expressions contains selected work from the 1979 Creative Writing Contest winners and honorable mentions along with Commercial Art students at Des Moines Area Community College. Design, typography and layout was done by Journalism students.https://openspace.dmacc.edu/expressions/1001/thumbnail.jp

Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001–2010

Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies. Results: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0$370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001–2010. Conclusions: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies

Assessing local scale impacts of Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae) invasion on beetle and spider diversity in Kruger National Park, South Africa

There is a paucity of studies examining direct impacts of introduced alien species on biodiversity, a key need for motivating for alien species control in conservation areas. The introduced prickly pear (Opuntia stricta) has invaded some 35 000 ha of Kruger National Park. We investigated the effect of O. stricta on beetle and spider species assemblages in the Skukuza region of Kruger National Park. We used unbaited pitfall traps over a 12-month period in four treatments of varying O. stricta density. Species richness, species density and abundance of beetles and spiders were compared. A total of 72 beetle and 128 spider species were collected. Species richness and species density for beetles and spiders did not differ significantly across the four treatments. Assemblages for spiders did not differ across treatments but beetle assemblages were significantly different from uninvaded control sites. This study suggests that the current density of O. stricta does not significantly affect spider species richness, density or assemblages but that beetle assemblages are significantly affected.The DST-NRF Centre for Invasion Biology and the University of Pretoria.http://www.bioone.org/loi/afzoab201

Expressions 1980

Expressions contains selected work from the 1980 Creative Writing Contest winners and honorable mentions, Campus Chronicle Photography Contest entrants, and the Commercial Art students at Des Moines Area Community College. Design, typography and layout was done by Journalism students.https://openspace.dmacc.edu/expressions/1002/thumbnail.jp