Barrett's lesion detection using a minimal integer-based neural network for embedded systems integration

Embedded processing architectures are often integrated into devices to develop novel functions in a cost-effective medical system. In order to integrate neural networks in medical equipment, these models require specialized optimizations for preparing their integration in a high-efficiency and power-constrained environment. In this paper, we research the feasibility of quantized networks with limited memory for the detection of Barrett’s neoplasia. An Efficientnet-lite1+Deeplabv3 architecture is proposed, which is trained using a quantization-aware training scheme, in order to achieve an 8-bit integer-based model. The performance of the quantized model is comparable with float32 precision models. We show that the quantized model with only 5-MB memory is capable of reaching the same performance scores with 95% Area Under the Curve (AUC), compared to a fullprecision U-Net architecture, which is 10× larger. We have also optimized the segmentation head for efficiency and reduced the output to a resolution of 32×32 pixels. The results show that this resolution captures sufficient segmentation detail to reach a DICE score of 66.51%, which is comparable to the full floating-point model. The proposed lightweight approach also makes the model quite energy-efficient, since it can be real-time executed on a 2-Watt Coral Edge TPU. The obtained low power consumption of the lightweight Barrett’s esophagus neoplasia detection and segmentation system enables the direct integration into standard endoscopic equipment

Radiofrequency Ablation vs Endoscopic Surveillance for Patients With Barrett Esophagus and Low-Grade Dysplasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Barrett esophagus containing low-grade dysplasia is associated with an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with a rapidly increasing incidence in the western world.Objective To investigate whether endoscopic radiofrequency ablation could decrease the rate of neoplastic progression.Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter randomized clinical trial that enrolled 136 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Barrett esophagus containing low-grade dysplasia at 9 European sites between June 2007 and June 2011. Patient follow-up ended May 2013.Interventions Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either endoscopic treatment with radiofrequency ablation (ablation) or endoscopic surveillance (control). Ablation was performed with the balloon device for circumferential ablation of the esophagus or the focal device for targeted ablation, with a maximum of 5 sessions allowed.Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was neoplastic progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma during a 3-year follow-up since randomization. Secondary outcomes were complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia and adverse events.Results Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive ablation and 68 to receive control. Ablation reduced the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma by 25.0% (1.5% for ablation vs 26.5% for control; 95% CI, 14.1%-35.9%; P

Safety and efficacy of hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre REVITA-2 feasibility trial

Objective: Hydrothermal duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a safe, outpatient endoscopic procedure. REVITA-2, a double-blind, superiority RCT, investigates safety and efficacy of DMR using the single catheter Revita system (Revita DMR [catheter and system], on glycaemic control and liver fat content in Type 2 Diabetes (T2D).Design: Eligible patients (HbA1c 59–86mmol/mol, BMI ≥24 and ≤40kg/m2, fasting insulin >48.6pmol/L, ≥1 oral antidiabetic medication) enrolled in Europe and Brazil. Primary endpoints were safety, change from baseline in HbA1c at 24 weeks, and liver magnetic resonance imaging proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at 12 weeks. Results: Overall mITT (DMR N=56; sham N=52), 24-weeks post-DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was −10.4 (18.6) mmol/mol in DMR group versus −7.1 (16.4) mmol/mol in sham group (p=0.147). In patients with baseline liver MRI-PDFF >5% (DMR n=48; sham n=43), 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was −5.4 (5.6)% in DMR group versus −2.9 (6.2)% in sham group (p=0.096). Results from prespecified interaction testing and clinical parameter assessment showed heterogeneity between European (DMR N=39; sham N=37) and Brazilian (DMR N=17; sham N=16) populations (p=0.063), therefore, results were stratified by region. In European mITT, 24-weeks post-DMR, median (IQR) HbA1c change was –6.6 mmol/mol (17.5 mmol/mol) versus –3.3 mmol/mol (10.9 mmol/mol) post-sham (p=0.033); 12-week post-DMR liver-fat change was –5.4% (6.1%) versus –2.2% (4.3%) post-sham (p=0.035). Brazilian mITT results trended towards DMR benefit in HbA1c, but not liver fat, in context of a large sham effect. In overall PP, patients with high baseline fasting plasma glucose ([FPG] ≥10 mmol/L) had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c post-DMR versus sham (p=0.002). Most adverse events were mild and transient. Conclusions: DMR is safe and exerts beneficial disease-modifying metabolic effects in T2D with or without non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD), particularly in patients with high FPG

Endoscopic risk factors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus

Barrett’s oesophagus is a precursor lesion for oesophageal adenocarcinoma, which generally has a poor prognosis. Patients diagnosed with Barrett’s oesophagus therefore undergo regular endoscopic surveillance to detect neoplastic lesions at a curable stage. The efficacy of endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus patients is, however, hampered by difficulties to detect early neoplasia endoscopically, biopsy sampling error, inter-observer variability in histological assessment and the relatively low overall progression rate. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Barrett’s surveillance may be improved by using endoscopic and clinical characteristics to risk-stratify Barrett’s patients to high- and low-risk categories. Recent national and international surveillance guidelines have incorporated Barrett’s length and presence of low-grade dysplasia in the advised surveillance intervals. In this review we will discuss endoscopic characteristics that may be associated with neoplastic progression in Barrett’s oesophagus and that may be used to tailor surveillance in Barrett’s patients

Advancing Approaches for Superficial Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Shifting Toward More Patient-tailored Therapy

The incidence of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rising and warrants awareness. Invasive surgery with lymph node dissection was long standard treatment for EAC. However, endoscopic resection techniques, such as cap-based endoscopic resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), have proven to be safe and effective alternatives for removal of superficial EAC. Therefore, endoscopic resection is now the cornerstone of management for superficial EAC, for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Current guidelines advise use of the cap-based approach for small, flat lesions, whereas ESD is recommended for large and bulky lesions, lesions with suspected submucosal invasion, or lesions in scarred areas. The histopathological assessment after a resection, evaluating histological risk factors for lymph node metastases, plays a key role in the decision about whether additional surgery is indicated. Until recently, all submucosal and/or high-risk EAC had an indication for additional (prophylactic) surgery because of the assumed high risk for lymph node metastases. However, this risk appears lower than initially assumed, and endoscopic management for low-risk submucosal EAC is gaining acceptance. Ongoing prospective trials will help to determine whether a watchful waiting strategy could be an alternative to surgery in patients with submucosal and/or high-risk EAC. In the future, the distinction between patients who can safely be followed with a watchful waiting strategy and patients who might benefit from additional surgery could become more unambiguous, resulting in more optimal patient-tailored management for patients with superficial EAC