Impact of prior CKD management in a renal care network on early outcomes in incident dialysis patients: a prospective observational study

Abstract Background Effective therapeutic strategies are available to prevent adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) but their clinical results are hindered by unplanned implementation. Coordination of care emerges as a suitable way to improve patient outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the effect of planned and coordinated patient management within a dedicated renal care network comparatively to standard renal care delivered in nephrology departments of teaching hospitals. Methods This observational matched cohort study included 40 patients with CKD stage 4–5 in the network group as compared with a control group of 120 patients matched for age, sex and diabetic status. Main outcome was a composite endpoint of death from cardiovascular cause and cardiovascular events during the first year after dialysis initiation. Results There was no difference between the two groups neither for the primary outcome (40% vs 41%) nor for the occurrence of death from cardiovascular cause or cardiovascular events. Whereas the proportion of patients requiring at least one hospitalization was identical (83.3% vs 75%), network patients experienced less individual hospitalizations than control patients (2.3±2.0 vs 1.6±1.7) during the year before dialysis start. Patients of the network group had a slower renal function decline (7.7±2.5 vs 4.9±1.1 ml/min/1,73m2 per year; p=0.04). Conclusions In this limited series of patients, we were unable to demonstrate a significant impact of the coordinated renal care provided in the network on early cardiovascular events in incident dialysis patients. However, during the predialysis period, there were less hospitalizations and a slower slope of renal function decrease. </jats:sec

Large kidneys predict poor renal outcome in subjects with diabetes and chronic kidney disease

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Renal hypertrophy occurs early in diabetic nephropathy, its later value is unknown. Do large kidneys still predict poor outcome in patients with diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)?</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Seventy-five patients with diabetes and CKD according to a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR, by 51Cr-EDTA clearance) below 60 mL/min/1.73 m²or an Albumin Excretion Rate above 30 mg/24 H, had an ultrasound imaging of the kidneys and were cooperatively followed during five years by the Diabetology and Nephrology departments of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The patients were mainly men (44/75), aged 62 ± 13 yrs, with long-standing diabetes (duration:17 ± 9 yrs, 55/75 type 2), and CKD: initial GFR: 56.5 (8.5-209) mL/min/1.73 m², AER: 196 (20-2358) mg/24 H. Their mean kidney lenght (108 ± 13 mm, 67-147) was correlated to the GFR (r = 0.23, p < 0.05). During the follow-up, 9/11 of the patients who had to start dialysis came from the half with the largest kidneys (LogRank: p < 0.05), despite a 40% higher initial isotopic GFR. Serum creatinine were initially lower (Small kidneys: 125 (79-320) μmol/L, Large: 103 (50-371), p < 0.05), but significantly increased in the "large kidneys" group at the end of the follow-up (Small kidneys: 129 (69-283) μmol/L, Large: 140 (50-952), p < 0.005 vs initial). The difference persisted in the patients with severe renal failure (KDOQI stages 4,5).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Large kidneys still predict progression in advanced CKD complicating diabetes. In these patients, ultrasound imaging not only excludes obstructive renal disease, but also provides information on the progression of the renal disease.</p

Differential Uridyl-diphosphate-Glucuronosyl Transferase 1A enzymatic arsenal explains the specific cytotoxicity of resveratrol towards tumor colorectal cells

Abstract Resveratrol belongs to the Bioactive Food Component (BFC) family. It seems admitted that its cytotoxic action impacts tumor cells and spares healthy cells, but the published proofs remain rare. We hypothesized that cells may differentially metabolize resveratrol and lead to different systemic impacts. For this, resveratrol metabolization was evaluated by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with diode array detection (DAD), and correlated with the expression of Uridyl-diphosphate-Glucuronosyl Transferase 1A (UGT1A) genes. The expression of UGT1A genes in human colorectal tissues was studied with RNAseq databases. Functional validation of UGT1A enzymes implication in resveratrol sensitivity of colorectal cells established by UGT1A expression modulation. As resveratrol impacts the S phase of the cell cycle, nucleotide metabolic balance was assessed. We found that resveratrol was more cytotoxic in cells with downregulation of UGTs, i.e. tumor cells. Conversely, overexpression of the UGT1A10 gene in an initial resveratrol-sensitive tumor cell line restored the metabolization accompanied by cytotoxicity diminution. Resveratrol affected intestinal sensitive tumor cell homeostasis with a cell growth/proliferation decoupling, cell-cycle modulation, and UXP/AXP nucleotide imbalance resulting in a global reduction of transcription and translation. This impact on global cell activity was restricted to tumor cells. This study improves resveratrol’s general knowledge and explains how its antitumor action can spare non-tumor cells. It also paves the way to select colorectal tumors eligible for resveratrol treatment potentiation without additional toxicity to healthy digestive tissues.</jats:p

Preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with carboplatin (CBP)/paclitaxel (PCL) (CP) or with 5-fluorouracil (FU)/oxaliplatin (OX) (Fx) for esophageal or junctional cancer: A randomized phase 2 trial.

4015 Background: Preoperative CRT with a FU/platinum regimen has been used for years for esophageal or junctional cancer before the CP regimen became a standard of care following the results of the CROSS study (van Hagen 2012). We aimed at evaluating the complete resection (R0) rate and severe postoperative morbidity rate associated with these 2 neoadjuvant regimens, each being combined with the radiation (RT) regime used in the CROSS trial. Methods: PROTECT is a multicenter, randomized, non-comparative, phase 2 trial (NCT02359968) in patients (pts) with resectable esophageal or Siewert type I-II junctional cancer, stage II (T1-2N1 or T3N0) or stage III (T3N1 or T4anyN) tumors (UICC-7 classification), and ECOG PS ≤2. Following randomization (balanced by ECOG PS 0 vs 1-2, stage II vs III, squamous-cell (SCC) vs adenocarcinoma (ADK), center), pts received CP (AUC2 CBP plus PCL 50mg/m² / week x 5 weeks), or Fx (FU 400 mg/m² bolus Day 1, then FU 1600 mg/m² continuous infusion over 2 days, plus OX 85 mg/m², and Folinic acid 200 mg/m², 2-h infusion, Day 1; 3 cycles every 2 weeks). RT technique was similar in both arms: 3D-conformal as published in the CROSS trial or IMRT (n = 35); total dose of 41.4Gy, 5 fractions of 1.8Gy / week, starting at Day 1 of chemotherapy. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after completion of CRT through a transthoracic or mini-invasive approach with a two field extended lymphadenectomy. Co-primary endpoints were R0 (failure: R1 or disease progression under CRT), and severe postoperative morbidity rate ≤30 days after surgery (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III). Based on a Bryant and Day 2-stage design (p0 = 75% and p1 = 90% for resection; p0 = 45% and p1 = 25% for morbidity; α = 10% and β = 15%), 48 evaluable pts were required by arm. Results: 100/104 pts recruited from 02/2015 to 08/2020, started the study treatment: 50 CP &amp; 50 Fx. Overall, median age = 64 (range, 33-79); 82/100 males; 62 ADK and 38 SCC; 66 esophageal and 34 junctional site; 31 stage II; 68 stage III, 1 Nx. R0 resection was obtained in 46/50 CP pts (92.0%, 95% CI: 80.8-97.8%), and in 42/48 Fx pts (87.5%, 74.8-95.3%); 2 non evaluable pts because of event unrelated to disease progression. Severe postoperative adverse events (AEs) occurred in 34/91 pts who underwent surgery: 21/48 CP (43.8%, 29.5-58.8%) and 13/43 Fx (30.2%, 17.2-46.1%). Severe AEs were respiratory disorders (CP 26%; Fx 26%), esophageal fistula (CP 18%; Fx 6%), infection (CP 5%; Fx 3%), haemorrhage (CP 5%; Fx 0%) and gastric tube necrosis (CP 6%; Fx 3%). 5 pts died from AEs (3 CP, 2 Fx). A TRG1-2 was observed in 29/48 (60.4%, 95% CI: 44.3-74.2%) CP pts, and in 19/43 (44.2%, 29.1-60.1%) Fx pts. Conclusions: When combined to preoperative radiation therapy at 41.4Gy, both regimens (CP and Fx) provided short-term benefit on R0 resection; however, CP is associated with a severe postoperative morbidity rate higher than expected. Clinical trial information: NCT02359968. </jats:p