5 research outputs found
Usual daily dietary intakes of non pregnant/non lactating women in Kisangani (city), Turumbu women in Kisangani (city) and Turumbu women in Yaoseko (village)<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>All values are usual intake means ± standard deviation, with adjustment for <i>recall day</i> and <i>interviewer</i>;</p>2<p>% of women under RDA, recommended daily allowances for adults <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030533#pone.0030533-FAO2" target="_blank">[24]</a>;</p>3<p>ANOVA comparison of means. If p<0.05, a Tukey <i>post-hoc</i> test was performed. Different letters indicate statistically different means at 0.05 level;</p>4<p><i>P</i> adjusted for total energy intake in the model as described by <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030533#pone.0030533-Willet1" target="_blank">[55]</a>.</p
Proportion of women that consumed food groups and food items<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>Only food items consumed by at least 5% of a group are reported, except for WEP. All WEP consumed in this study are shown; they are preceded by an asterisk. For WEP herbarium references we refer to Termote et al. (2010, 2011).</p>2<p>The Turumbu living in the city were compared with the overall city sample and the Turumbu from the village were compared with the Turumbu from the city. χ<sup>2</sup>-tests were performed for all food groups and wild food items which were consumed by at least 10 persons over the two samples compared.</p>3<p>Safou (<i>Dacryodes edulis</i>) occurs native in Central Africa. This species is cultivated on a small scale around the homesteads, but also harvested from the wild. It can be considered as semi-wild.</p
Sample characteristics of the food consumption survey.
1<p>Mean with standard deviation;</p>2<p>calculated using χ<sup>2</sup>-tests for factor variables; ANOVA for comparison of means, if p<0.05, a Tukey <i>post-hoc</i> test was performed, different letters indicate statistically different means at 0.05 level.</p
Usual daily dietary intakes of non pregnant/non lactating WEP-consumers and non-consumers (safou included)<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>All values are usual intake means ± standard deviation, with adjustment for <i>recall day</i> and <i>interviewer</i>;</p>2<p>people who consumed more than 10 g of WEP in at least one of both recalls (safou included);</p>3<p>Model based difference of means (WEP consumer – non WEP consumer), adjusted for the fixed effect <i>sample</i>;</p>4<p>Model-based adjusted for the fixed effect <i>sample</i>;</p>5<p>Adjusted for total energy intake in the model as described by <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030533#pone.0030533-Willet1" target="_blank">[55]</a>.</p
Energy contribution of food groups and wild foods per sample<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>All values are usual intake means ± standard deviation, with adjustment for <i>recall day</i> and <i>interviewer</i>;</p>2<p>ANOVA comparison of means. If p<0.05, a Tukey <i>post-hoc</i> test was performed, different letters indicate statistically different means at 0.05 level;</p>3<p>1 calorie = 4.1868 Joule.</p>4<p>expressed as percentage of total energy intake;</p>5<p>“-” indicates that the energy contribution from these foods was insignificant.</p