5 research outputs found

    SIV-specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells from LTNP/EC mediate greater lysis of SIV-infected CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cell targets compared with progressors.

    No full text
    <p>GrB target cell activity (<b>A</b>) and infected CD4 elimination (ICE) (<b>B</b>) are shown for LTNP/EC (nā€Š=ā€Š10, GrB target cell activity; nā€Š=ā€Š11, ICE) and progressors (nā€Š=ā€Š11). Horizontal bars represent the median values. <b>C.</b> Correlation between ICE and GrB target cell activity (nā€Š=ā€Š22) was determined by the Spearman rank method. Red, blue and cyan dots represent LTNP/EC, progressors and one SIV-uninfected animal, respectively.</p

    SIV-specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell cytotoxicity measured by granzyme B delivery or Infected CD4 Elimination (ICE).

    No full text
    <p><b>A.</b> The top panels show granzyme B (GrB) target cell activity representative of a ā€œhigh responderā€. The bottom panels show GrB target cell activity representative of a ā€œlow responderā€. Values indicate percentages of targets with increased fluorescence due to GrB substrate cleavage. Background GrB target cell activity measured in response to uninfected targets (left column) was subtracted from responses measured against infected targets (right column) to determine net GrB target cell activity (red values). <b>B.</b> ICE values calculated based on p27 expression (sum of the upper quadrants) as described in the Methods, are shown in red for the same ā€œhigh responderā€ (78.8%, top row) and ā€œlow responderā€ (22.3%, bottom row) as shown in A. Quadrant values indicate percentages of gated targets. In all experiments, CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell lines were used as targets. CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells that had been stimulated with SIV-infected targets for 6 days were used as effectors. GrB target cell activity and ICE were calculated after 1 hour of incubation of effectors and plated at an Eāˆ¶T ratio of 25āˆ¶1.</p

    SIV-specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells of LTNP/EC mediate greater per-cell killing of SIV-infected targets than those of progressors, which is not simply due to higher true Eāˆ¶T ratios.

    No full text
    <p><b>A.</b> The true effector to target (Eāˆ¶T) ratios, determined by measurements of IFN-Ī³-secreting CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell effectors and p27-expressing CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cell targets, respectively, as described in the Methods and shown in the <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003195#ppat.1003195.s001" target="_blank">Figure S1</a> and <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003195#ppat.1003195.s002" target="_blank">Table S1</a>, were compared between LTNP/EC (nā€Š=ā€Š11) and progressors (nā€Š=ā€Š11). Horizontal bars represent the median values. <b>B, C.</b> GrB target cell activity (<b>B</b>) or ICE (<b>C</b>) responses plotted against the true Eāˆ¶T ratios are shown for LTNP/EC (nā€Š=ā€Š10, GrB target cell activity; nā€Š=ā€Š11, ICE) and progressors (nā€Š=ā€Š11). GrB target cell activity is shown after subtraction of background. The response curves were analyzed by regressing ICE and GrB on log true Eāˆ¶T ratios using analysis of covariance. The standard two-tailed t test from regression analysis was used to compare estimated GrB target cell activity and ICE of LTNP/EC with that of progressors at the 5.8 Eāˆ¶T ratio, the median of the combined Eāˆ¶T ranges of both groups.</p
    corecore