Factores que inciden en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes del grado 6 de la institución educativa Santa Rita de Aipe, Huila-Colombia

146 p.El presente documento es el resultado de una investigación llevada a cabo en el contexto educativo, el cual consistió en determinar los factores que inciden en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes del grado 6 de la Institución Educativa de Santa Rita del municipio de Aipe - Huila, tomado como sustento teórico el aprendizaje significativo. Este se inicia con la descripción de la problemática, sus bases teóricas y conceptuales que dan paso a la metodología con un enfoque cuantitativo y un tipo de investigación descriptiva, basado en un diseño preexperimental, para la cual se utilizó una encuesta aplicada a los estudiantes y un trabajo de observación, con un cuestionario de 72preguntas tipo dicotómicas, que tienen solo dos alternativas de respuesta. A través del análisis se concluye que los factores que inciden en el rendimiento son: personales en cuanto a la motivación e intereses por terminar sus estudios. A partir de los resultados arrojados por la encuesta se propone la realización de estrategias gerenciales con el objetivo de mejorar el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes del grado 6 de la Institución Educativa Santa Rita de Aipe, Huila-Colombia, y que responda a las necesidades propias del contexto.This document is the result of an investigation carried out in the educational context, which consisted of determining the factors that influence the academic performance of students in 6 grade of the Educative Institution of Santa Rita in the municipality of Aipe - Huila, taken as theoretical support the significant learning. This begins with the description of the problem, its theoretical and conceptual bases that give way to the methodology with a quantitative approach and a type of descriptive investigation, based on a pre-experimental design, in which a survey was applied to the students and an observation work was used, with a questionnaire of 72 dichotomous questions, which have only two alternatives responses. Through the analysis it is concluded that the factors that influence the performance are: personal in terms of motivation and interests to finish their studies. Based on the results of the survey, I propose the implementation of management strategies with the objective of improving the academic performance of students in 6 grade at the Educative Institution of Santa Rita de Aipe, Huila-Colombia, and that responds to the needs of the context

Factores que inciden en el rendimiento acad?mico de los estudiantes del grado 6 de la instituci?n educativa Santa Rita de Aipe, Huila-Colombia

146 p.El presente documento es el resultado de una investigaci?n llevada a cabo en el contexto educativo, el cual consisti? en determinar los factores que inciden en el rendimiento acad?mico de los estudiantes del grado 6 de la Instituci?n Educativa de Santa Rita del municipio de Aipe - Huila, tomado como sustento te?rico el aprendizaje significativo. Este se inicia con la descripci?n de la problem?tica, sus bases te?ricas y conceptuales que dan paso a la metodolog?a con un enfoque cuantitativo y un tipo de investigaci?n descriptiva, basado en un dise?o preexperimental, para la cual se utiliz? una encuesta aplicada a los estudiantes y un trabajo de observaci?n, con un cuestionario de 72preguntas tipo dicot?micas, que tienen solo dos alternativas de respuesta. A trav?s del an?lisis se concluye que los factores que inciden en el rendimiento son: personales en cuanto a la motivaci?n e intereses por terminar sus estudios. A partir de los resultados arrojados por la encuesta se propone la realizaci?n de estrategias gerenciales con el objetivo de mejorar el rendimiento acad?mico de los estudiantes del grado 6 de la Instituci?n Educativa Santa Rita de Aipe, Huila-Colombia, y que responda a las necesidades propias del contexto.This document is the result of an investigation carried out in the educational context, which consisted of determining the factors that influence the academic performance of students in 6 grade of the Educative Institution of Santa Rita in the municipality of Aipe - Huila, taken as theoretical support the significant learning. This begins with the description of the problem, its theoretical and conceptual bases that give way to the methodology with a quantitative approach and a type of descriptive investigation, based on a pre-experimental design, in which a survey was applied to the students and an observation work was used, with a questionnaire of 72 dichotomous questions, which have only two alternatives responses. Through the analysis it is concluded that the factors that influence the performance are: personal in terms of motivation and interests to finish their studies. Based on the results of the survey, I propose the implementation of management strategies with the objective of improving the academic performance of students in 6 grade at the Educative Institution of Santa Rita de Aipe, Huila-Colombia, and that responds to the needs of the context

Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccinationResearch in context

Summary: Background: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. Methods: In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. Findings: Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. Interpretation: Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. Funding: National Institutes of Health

Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccinationResearch in context

Background: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. Methods: In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. Findings: Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. Interpretation: Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. Funding: National Institutes of Health