21 research outputs found

    Association of different risk factors with wheeze ever in white children aged one year (unadjusted).

    No full text
    <p>ETS: environmental tobacco smoke</p><p>*Attack group: "Did she smoke in the year this child was born?"; Whistling group: "Did she smoke during the pregnancy with this child?"</p><p><sup>†</sup> The categories cover the following Townsend Deprivation Index intervals: more affluent: [-6.222, -1.397]; average: [-1.396, 2.828]; more deprived: [2.829, 11.072]; We used a likelihood-ratio test to calculate the p-value for interaction for this variable</p><p><sup>‡</sup> Age at end of education >16 years (mother or father)</p><p>Association of different risk factors with wheeze ever in white children aged one year (unadjusted).</p

    Prevalence of indicators of wheeze severity (white children).

    No full text
    <p><sup>†</sup> Chi squared tests</p><p>Prevalence of indicators of wheeze severity (white children).</p

    Crude and adjusted odds ratios for respiratory symptoms in white children.

    No full text
    <p>The odds ratios compare the whistling group to the attack group (adjusted for sex, exact age, breast feeding, nursery care, number of siblings, pre- and postnatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), parental asthma and parental hay fever, Townsend score (an area-based deprivation measure) and parental education). The error bars denote 95% confidence intervals.</p

    Prevalence of wheeze and other respiratory symptoms (white children).

    No full text
    <p>*A few questionnaire items had different wording in the two groups. Among them was the question about wheeze ever: Attack group: "Has your child ever had attacks of wheezing?"; Whistling group: "Has your child ever had wheezing or whistling in the chest at any time in the past?" Based on this, the groups were labeled "attack group" and "whistling group".</p><p><sup>†</sup> Chi squared tests</p><p>Prevalence of wheeze and other respiratory symptoms (white children).</p

    Comparison of clinical and perinatal attributes between clustered<sup>*</sup> and nonclustered cases of CL both unadjusted and adjusted for local child population density.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of clinical and perinatal attributes between clustered<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0170020#t002fn002" target="_blank">*</a></sup> and nonclustered cases of CL both unadjusted and adjusted for local child population density.</p
    corecore