9 research outputs found
Cross-Sectional Relationship<sup>a</sup><sup>b</sup><sup>a</sup><sup>b</sup>.
<p>Multivariate Regression Model with Coefficients and 95% Confidence Intervals Indicating Relationship between TUG speed and Perceptions of Aging Cross-Sectionally.</p><p><sup>a</sup> 95% confidence intervals in brackets.</p><p>* <i>p</i><0.05,</p><p>** <i>p</i><0.01,</p><p>*** <i>p</i><0.001.</p><p><sup>b</sup>ADL = Activities of Daily living; IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.</p><p>Cross-Sectional Relationship<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn002" target="_blank">a</a></sup><sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn006" target="_blank">b</a></sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn002" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn006" target="_blank"><sup>b</sup></a>.</p
Longitudinal Relationship<sup>a</sup><sup>b</sup><sup>a</sup><sup>b</sup>.
<p>Multivariate linear regression analysis indicating the relationship between baseline perceptions of aging and walking speed 2 years later.</p><p><sup>a</sup> 95% confidence intervals in brackets.</p><p><sup>*</sup><i>p</i><0.05,</p><p><sup>**</sup><i>p</i><0.01,</p><p><sup>***</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p><sup>b</sup> MMSE = Mini Mental State Examination</p><p>Longitudinal Relationship<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn002" target="_blank">a</a></sup><sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn006" target="_blank">b</a></sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn002" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn006" target="_blank"><sup>b</sup></a>.</p
Marginal Mean Timed Up-And-Go.
<p>Marginal Mean Timed Up-And-Go in Seconds by Level of Agreement with the Negative Control and Consequences Domain of Aging Perceptions.</p
Correlations <sup>a</sup><sup>b</sup>.
<p>Bivariate Correlation Between Domains of the Short-Form Aging Perceptions Questionnaire and all</p><p>continuous-covariates.</p><p><sup>a</sup>***p<.001,</p><p>**p<.01,</p><p>* p<.05.</p><p><sup>b</sup> TC = Timeline Chronic; PC = Positive Control; NCC = Negative Control and Consequences; PCq = Positive Consequences; ER = Emotional Representations</p><p>Correlations <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t002fn003" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t002fn006" target="_blank"><sup>b</sup></a>.</p
Adjusted odds ratios <sup>†</sup> (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) for all falls (AF), non-accidental falls (NAF) and syncope in the 12 months prior to wave 1 (n = 8172).
<p>Adjusted odds ratios <sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0180997#t003fn001" target="_blank">†</a></sup> (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) for all falls (AF), non-accidental falls (NAF) and syncope in the 12 months prior to wave 1 (n = 8172).</p
Multi-variate analysis with odds ratios (OR) of participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF) (n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA (n = 8,172).
<p>Multi-variate analysis with odds ratios (OR) of participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF) (n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA (n = 8,172).</p
Baseline variables for all participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF)(n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA.
<p>Baseline variables for all participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF)(n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA.</p
Prevalence and incidence of all falls, non-accidental falls (NAF) and syncope.
<p>Prevalence (wave one) and incidence (wave two) based on self-reported data from TILDA participants (n = 8172).</p