Cross-Sectional Relationship^a^b^a^b.

<p>Multivariate Regression Model with Coefficients and 95% Confidence Intervals Indicating Relationship between TUG speed and Perceptions of Aging Cross-Sectionally.</p><p>^a 95% confidence intervals in brackets.</p><p>* <i>p</i><0.05,</p><p>** <i>p</i><0.01,</p><p>*** <i>p</i><0.001.</p><p>^bADL = Activities of Daily living; IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.</p><p>Cross-Sectional Relationship^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn002" target="_blank">a</a>}^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn006" target="_blank">b</a>}<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn002" target="_blank">^a</a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t003fn006" target="_blank">^b</a>.</p

Longitudinal Relationship^a^b^a^b.

<p>Multivariate linear regression analysis indicating the relationship between baseline perceptions of aging and walking speed 2 years later.</p><p>^a 95% confidence intervals in brackets.</p><p>^*<i>p</i><0.05,</p><p>^**<i>p</i><0.01,</p><p>^***<i>p</i><0.001</p><p>^b MMSE = Mini Mental State Examination</p><p>Longitudinal Relationship^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn002" target="_blank">a</a>}^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn006" target="_blank">b</a>}<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn002" target="_blank">^a</a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t004fn006" target="_blank">^b</a>.</p

Marginal Mean Timed Up-And-Go.

<p>Marginal Mean Timed Up-And-Go in Seconds by Level of Agreement with the Negative Control and Consequences Domain of Aging Perceptions.</p

Correlations ^a^b.

<p>Bivariate Correlation Between Domains of the Short-Form Aging Perceptions Questionnaire and all</p><p>continuous-covariates.</p><p>^a***p<.001,</p><p>**p<.01,</p><p>* p<.05.</p><p>^b TC = Timeline Chronic; PC = Positive Control; NCC = Negative Control and Consequences; PCq = Positive Consequences; ER = Emotional Representations</p><p>Correlations <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t002fn003" target="_blank">^a</a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0123260#t002fn006" target="_blank">^b</a>.</p

Flow Chart.

<p>Flow Chart Indicating Participants Remaining From Waves 1–2.</p

Adjusted odds ratios ^† (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) for all falls (AF), non-accidental falls (NAF) and syncope in the 12 months prior to wave 1 (n = 8172).

<p>Adjusted odds ratios ^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0180997#t003fn001" target="_blank">†</a>} (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) for all falls (AF), non-accidental falls (NAF) and syncope in the 12 months prior to wave 1 (n = 8172).</p

Multi-variate analysis with odds ratios (OR) of participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF) (n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA (n = 8,172).

<p>Multi-variate analysis with odds ratios (OR) of participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF) (n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA (n = 8,172).</p

Baseline variables for all participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF)(n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA.

<p>Baseline variables for all participants reporting all falls (n = 1,579), non-accidental falls (NAF)(n = 406) and syncope (n = 363) in wave one of TILDA.</p

Prevalence and incidence of all falls, non-accidental falls (NAF) and syncope.

<p>Prevalence (wave one) and incidence (wave two) based on self-reported data from TILDA participants (n = 8172).</p