Exercise capacity in children with isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block: does pacing make a difference?

Item does not contain fulltextThe management of patients with isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) has changed during the last decades. The current policy is to pace the majority of patients based on a variety of criteria, among which is limited exercise capacity. Data regarding exercise capacity in this population stems from previous publications reporting small case series of unpaced patients. Therefore, we have investigated the exercise capacity of a group of contemporary children with CCAVB. Sixteen children (mean age 11.5 +/- 4; seven boys, nine girls) with CCAVB were tested. In 13 patients, a median number of three pacemakers were implanted, whereas in three patients no pacemaker was given. All patients had an echocardiogram and completed a cardiopulmonary cycle exercise test. Exercise parameters were determined and compared with reference values obtained from healthy Dutch peers. The peak oxygen uptake/body mass was reduced to 34.4 +/- 9.5 ml kg(-1) min(-1) (79 +/- 24% of predicted) and the ventilatory threshold was reduced to 52 +/- 17% of peak oxygen uptake (78 +/- 21% of predicted), whereas the peak work load/body mass was 2.8 +/- 0.6 W/kg (91 +/- 24% of predicted), which was similar to controls. Importantly, 25% of the paced patients showed upper rate restriction by the pacemaker. In conclusion, children with CCAVB show a reduced peak oxygen uptake and ventilatory threshold, whereas they show normal peak work rates. This indicates that they generate more energy during exercise from anaerobic energy sources. Paced children with CCAVB do not perform better than unpaced children.1 april 201

Cross-stimulation during lead impedance monitoring

At the age of 4 years, a total cavopulmonary connection was performed in a boy with a complex congenital heart defect. On addition, a DDDR pacemaker was implanted for sick sinus syndrome. Atrial and ventricular leads were epicardially placed at the left atrium and left ventricle. At the age of 10 years, a new epicardial ventricular lead was placed because of malfunction of the existing lead. At the some operation the pulse generator was replaced by a Medtronic Kappa DR 731. After replacement, the boy experienced episodes of phrenic nerve stimulation associated with feelings of discomfort. Holter recordings revealed ventricular stimulation from the atrial stimulus for 2 consecutive beats. This phenomenon repeated exactly every 3 hours and was caused by the automatic lead impedance measurement that used a 5-V, 1-ms stimulus output

Pharmacological treatment of young children with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia

Our objective was to assess the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in reducing the incidence of permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia in young children, or to bring the mean heart rate over 24 h to a normal level. We included 21 children with a median age of 0.05 year seen with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia over the period 1990 through 2001. Of these children, two had abnormal left ventricular function. Follow-up visits were made at least every 6 months. We registered the presence of the tachycardia over 24 h, the mean heart rate over 24 h, and cardiac function. Treatment was started with propafenone alone, or in combination with digoxin as the first choice. Treatment was effective in 14 cases (67%), with either complete disappearance of the tachycardia after discontinuation of medication, or continuation in sinus rhythm with medication; partially effective in 4 cases (20%) when the mean heart rate over 24 h on the last Holter recording was less than 1 standard deviation above the normal for age; but was not effective in the remaining 3 cases (14%). In 3 patients treated with propafenone, or 13 given propafenone and digoxin, treatment was effective in 12 (75%), partially effective in 2 (13%), and ineffective in the other 2 (13%). All 21 children had a normal left ventricular function at the end of follow-up. The median duration of follow-up was 2.4 years. Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia had disappeared spontaneously in one-third of the children, 5 being less than 1 year old. Adverse effects, seen in 5 cases, were mild or asymptomatic. No signs of proarrhythmia were registered. Pharmacological treatment, either with propafenone alone, or in combination with digoxin, is safe and effective in young children with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia. The mean heart rate is normalized, and cardiac function is restored and preserved. Radiofrequency ablation may be delayed to a safer age, with the arrhythmia disappearing spontaneously in one-third