16 research outputs found
Clinical and Biological Principles of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Application in Skin Cancer
<p><b>Article full text</b></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>The full text of this article can
be found here<b>. </b><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-016-0338-1?view=classic">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-016-0338-1?view=classic</a></p><p></p>
<p><br></p>
<p><b>Provide enhanced content for this
article</b></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>If you are an author of this
publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your
article then please contact <a href="http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/ĂąÂÂmailto:[email protected]ĂąÂÂ"><b>[email protected]</b></a>.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>The journal offers a range of
additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All
features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the
highest scientific standard and all features are marked as âpeer reviewedâ to
ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level
as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship
and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and
adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content
is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are
charged for hosting additional open access content.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Other enhanced features include,
but are not limited to:</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>âą Slide decks</p>
<p>âą Videos and animations</p>
<p>âą Audio abstracts</p>
<p>âą Audio slides</p
DataSheet_1_Efficacy and safety of anakinra and canakinumab in PSTPIP1-associated inflammatory diseases: a comprehensive scoping review.pdf
IntroductionThis scoping review explores the effectiveness of IL-1 pathway inhibitors in managing PSTPIP1-associated inflammatory diseases (PAID). These diseases are marked by abnormal IL-1 pathway activation due to genetic mutations.MethodsOur methodology adhered to a pre-published protocol and involved a thorough search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to February 2022, following the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewerâs Manual and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The review included studies reporting on IL-1 pathway inhibitor use in PAID patients.ResultsFrom an initial pool of 5,225 articles, 36 studies involving 43 patients were selected. The studies predominantly used observational designs and exhibited diversity in patient demographics, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Anakinra and canakinumab demonstrated promise in treating sterile pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne (PAPA) and PSTPIP1-associated myeloid-related-proteinemia inflammatory (PAMI) syndromes, with scant data on other syndromes. Notably, there was a paucity of information on the adverse effects of these treatments, necessitating cautious interpretation of their safety profile.ConclusionCurrent evidence on IL-1 pathway inhibitors for PAID is primarily from observational studies and remains limited. Rigorous research with larger patient cohorts is imperative for more definitive conclusions. Collaborative efforts among specialized research centers and international health initiatives are key to advancing this field.</p
Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasis
<div><p>Moderate-to-severe psoriasis is associated with significant comorbidity, an impaired quality of life, and increased medical costs, including those associated with treatments. Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized clinical trials are considered two of the best approaches to the summarization of high-quality evidence. However, methodological bias can reduce the validity of conclusions from these types of studies and subsequently impair the quality of decision making. As co-authorship is among the most well-documented forms of research collaboration, the present study aimed to explore whether authorsâ collaboration methods might influence the methodological quality of SRs and MAs of psoriasis. Methodological quality was assessed by two raters who extracted information from full articles. After calculating total and per-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scores, reviews were classified as low (0-4), medium (5-8), or high (9-11) quality. Article metadata and journal-related bibliometric indices were also obtained. A total of 741 authors from 520 different institutions and 32 countries published 220 reviews that were classified as high (17.2%), moderate (55%), or low (27.7%) methodological quality. The high methodological quality subnetwork was larger but had a lower connection density than the low and moderate methodological quality subnetworks; specifically, the former contained relatively fewer nodes (authors and reviews), reviews by authors, and collaborators per author. Furthermore, the high methodological quality subnetwork was highly compartmentalized, with several modules representing few poorly interconnected communities. In conclusion, structural differences in author-paper affiliation network may influence the methodological quality of SRs and MAs on psoriasis. As the author-paper affiliation network structure affects study quality in this research field, authors who maintain an appropriate balance between scientific quality and productivity are more likely to develop higher quality reviews.</p></div
Summary statistics for the co-authorship networks based on methodology quality.
<p>Summary statistics for the co-authorship networks based on methodology quality.</p
Influence of authorsâ scientific quality and productivity on methodological quality of SRs and MAs about psoriasis.
<p>Panel (a-c): Bubble plot that represents the number of publications by author. Bubble size is proportional to the authorâs H-index. Authors are sorted by their institutionâs country. Panel (d-f) represents a scatter plot of authorâs H-index vs. number of authored publications. Smoothed fitted lines represent predictions using linear regression for every country. Points and lines are colored based on author institution country.</p
Cumulative frequency of node degree distributions.
<p>The cumulative node degree distribution shows the cumulative number of nodes of each degree class. The distribution of degree values over all nodes characterizes the network as a whole.</p
Whole author-paper affiliation network.
<p>(a). Nodes that represent authors are colored and labeled based on their institutionâs country. Grey nodes represent the reviews on psoriasis which were finally included. Node size is proportional to the authorâs H-index or AMSTAR score respectively. Edges connect both types of nodes, thus every author and their collaborators are linked to the shared publication. (b). Same network, although only nodes representing articles are colored based on AMSTAR levels.</p
Author-paper affiliation subnetworks based on methodological quality of the reviews.
<p>Nodes that represent authors are colored and labeled based on their institutionâs country. Grey nodes represent the SRs and MAs on psoriasis which were finally included. Node size is proportional to the authorâs H-index or AMSTAR score respectively. Edges connect both types of nodes, thus every author and their collaborators are connected to the shared publication.</p
The differential impact of scientific quality, bibliometric factors, and social media activity on the influence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis
<div><p>Researchers are increasingly using on line social networks to promote their work. Some authors have suggested that measuring social media activity can predict the impact of a primary study (i.e., whether or not an article will be highly cited). However, the influence of variables such as scientific quality, research disclosures, and journal characteristics on systematic reviews and meta-analyses has not yet been assessed. The present study aims to describe the effect of complex interactions between bibliometric factors and social media activity on the impact of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis (PROSPERO 2016: CRD42016053181). Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. Altmetrics, which consider Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ mention counts as well as Mendeley and SCOPUS readers, and corresponding article citation counts from Google Scholar were obtained for each article. Metadata and journal-related bibliometric indices were also obtained. One-hundred and sixty-four reviews with available altmetrics information were included in the final multifactorial analysis, which showed that social media and impact factor have less effect than Mendeley and SCOPUS readers on the number of cites that appear in Google Scholar. Although a journalâs impact factor predicted the number of tweets (OR, 1.202; 95% CI, 1.087â1.049), the years of publication and the number of Mendeley readers predicted the number of citations in Google Scholar (OR, 1.033; 95% CI, 1.018â1.329). Finally, methodological quality was related neither with bibliometric influence nor social media activity for systematic reviews. In conclusion, there seems to be a lack of connectivity between scientific quality, social media activity, and article usage, thus predicting scientific success based on these variables may be inappropriate in the particular case of systematic reviews.</p></div
Influence of variable groups on multifactorial-based by clustering dendrogram comparisons.
<p>This panel of four plots compare dendrograms with the same set of labels, one facing the other, and having their labels connected by lines. In every comparison, all-variables clustering dendrogram was compared with a modified version of this dendrogram obtained after subtracting one of these group of variables at a time (a, âqualityâ: AMSTAR levels; b, âconflictâ: source of funding, number of authors with conflict of interest; c, âsocialâ: Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ mention counts; d, âusageâ: Mendeley and SCOPUS readers and citation counts from Google Scholar). Unique nodes are highlighted with dashed lines. Connecting lines are colored to highlight two sub-trees which are present in both dendrograms. Black lines connect nodes not included in the same sub-tree. Same color of trees branches show two common sub-trees.</p