83 research outputs found

    Matlis category equivalences for a ring epimorphism

    Full text link
    Under mild assumptions, we construct the two Matlis additive category equivalences for an associative ring epimorphism u ⁣:R→Uu\colon R\to U. Assuming that the ring epimorphism is homological of flat/projective dimension 11, we discuss the abelian categories of uu-comodules and uu-contramodules and construct the recollement of unbounded derived categories of RR-modules, UU-modules, and complexes of RR-modules with uu-co/contramodule cohomology. Further assumptions allow to describe the third category in the recollement as the unbounded derived category of the abelian categories of uu-comodules and uu-contramodules. For commutative rings, we also prove that any homological epimorphism of projective dimension 11 is flat. Injectivity of the map uu is not required.Comment: LaTeX 2e with tikz-cd, 30 pages, 6 commutative diagrams. v.1: This is an improved, expanded version of Sections 16-18 of the long preprint arXiv:1807.10671v1, which was divided into three parts. v.2: Terminological change of "u-h-divisible" to "u-divisible"; Remark 1.2(1), Proposition 2.4, Lemma 3.4, and Remark 3.5 inserted; references added; v.3: Final versio

    Smashing localizations of rings of weak global dimension at most one

    Get PDF
    We show for a ring R of weak global dimension at most one that there is a bijection between the smashing subcategories of its derived category and the equivalence classes of homological epimorphisms starting in R. If, moreover, R is commutative, we prove that the compactly generated localizing subcategories correspond precisely to flat epimorphisms. We also classify smashing localizations of the derived category of any valuation domain, and provide an easy criterion for the Telescope Conjecture (TC) for any commutative ring of weak global dimension at most one. As a consequence, we show that the TC holds for any commutative von Neumann regular ring R, and it holds precisely for those Pr\"ufer domains which are strongly discrete.Comment: 45 pages; version 2: several changes in the presentation (a section on the homotopy category of dg algebras became an appendix, more explanation added at various places of the text), main results unchange

    Flat Mittag-Leffler modules over countable rings

    Full text link
    We show that over any ring, the double Ext-orthogonal class to all flat Mittag-Leffler modules contains all countable direct limits of flat Mittag-Leffler modules. If the ring is countable, then the double orthogonal class consists precisely of all flat modules and we deduce, using a recent result of \v{S}aroch and Trlifaj, that the class of flat Mittag-Leffler modules is not precovering in Mod-R unless R is right perfect.Comment: 7 pages; version 2: minor changes, more explanation added in the proof of Theorem 6 and Lemma 7, references added and update

    Cotorsion pairs generated by modules of bounded projective dimension

    Full text link
    We apply the theory of cotorsion pairs to study closure properties of classes of modules with finite projective dimension with respect to direct limit operations and to filtrations. We also prove that if the ring is an order in an â„”0\aleph_0-noetherian ring Q of small finitistic dimension 0, then the cotorsion pair generated by the modules of projective dimension at most one is of finite type if and only if Q has big finitistic dimension 0. This applies, for example, to semiprime Goldie rings and Cohen Macaulay noetherian commutative rings.Comment: 30 Page

    Recollements from Cotorsion Pairs

    Full text link
    Given a complete hereditary cotorsion pair (A,B)(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}) in a Grothendieck category G\mathcal{G}, the derived category D(B)\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{B}) of the exact category B\mathcal{B} is defined as the quotient of the category Ch(B)\mathrm{Ch}(\mathcal{B}), of unbounded complexes with terms in B\mathcal{B}, modulo the subcategory B~\widetilde{\mathcal{B}} consisting of the acyclic complexes with terms in B\mathcal{B} and cycles in B\mathcal{B}. We restrict our attention to the cotorsion pairs such that B~\widetilde{\mathcal{B}} coincides with the class exBex\mathcal{B} of the acyclic complexes of Ch(G)\mathrm{Ch}(\mathcal{G}) with terms in B\mathcal{B}. In this case the derived category D(B)\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{B}) fits into a recollement exB∌←→←K(B)←→←Ch(B)exB\dfrac{ex\mathcal{B}}{\sim} \mathrel{\substack{\textstyle\leftarrow\textstyle\rightarrow\textstyle\leftarrow}} {K(\mathcal{B})} \mathrel{\substack{\textstyle\leftarrow\textstyle\rightarrow\textstyle\leftarrow}} {\dfrac{\mathrm{Ch}(\mathcal{B})}{ex\mathcal{B} }}. We will explore the conditions under which ex B=B~\mathrm{ex}\,\mathcal{B}=\widetilde{\mathcal{B}} and provide many examples. Symmetrically, we prove analogous results for the exact category A\mathcal{A}.Comment: Added Lemma 1.2 and fixed statement of Proposition 2.

    Covers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach

    Full text link
    We present applications of contramodule techniques to the Enochs conjecture about covers and direct limits, both in the categorical tilting context and beyond. In the nn-tilting-cotilting correspondence situation, if A\mathsf A is a Grothendieck abelian category and the related abelian category B\mathsf B is equivalent to the category of contramodules over a topological ring R\mathfrak R belonging to one of certain four classes of topological rings (e.g., R\mathfrak R is commutative), then the left tilting class is covering in A\mathsf A if and only if it is closed under direct limits in A\mathsf A, and if and only if all the discrete quotient rings of the topological ring R\mathfrak R are perfect. More generally, if MM is a module satisfying a certain telescope Hom exactness condition (e.g., MM is Σ\Sigma-pure-Ext⁡1\operatorname{Ext}^1-self-orthogonal) and the topological ring R\mathfrak R of endomorphisms of MM belongs to one of certain seven classes of topological rings, then the class Add(M)\mathsf{Add}(M) is closed under direct limits if and only if every countable direct limit of copies of MM has an Add(M)\mathsf{Add}(M)-cover, and if and only if MM has perfect decomposition. In full generality, for an additive category A\mathsf A with (co)kernels and a precovering class L⊂A\mathsf L\subset\mathsf A closed under summands, an object N∈AN\in\mathsf A has an L\mathsf L-cover if and only if a certain object ι(N)\Psi(N) in an abelian category B\mathsf B with enough projectives has a projective cover. The 11-tilting modules and objects arising from injective ring epimorphisms of projective dimension 11 form a class of examples which we discuss.Comment: LaTeX 2e with pb-diagram and xy-pic, 58 pages, 5 commutative diagrams. v.1: This paper is based on Sections 11-15 and 19 of the long preprint arXiv:1807.10671v1, which was divided into three parts. v.2: Many important improvements and additions based on new results in arXiv:1909.12203 and particularly in arXiv:1911.11720; new Section 5 inserted. v.4: Final versio

    SS-almost perfect commutative rings

    Full text link
    Given a multiplicative subset SS in a commutative ring RR, we consider SS-weakly cotorsion and SS-strongly flat RR-modules, and show that all RR-modules have SS-strongly flat covers if and only if all flat RR-modules are SS-strongly flat. These equivalent conditions hold if and only if the localization RSR_S is a perfect ring and, for every element s∈Ss\in S, the quotient ring R/sRR/sR is a perfect ring, too. The multiplicative subset S⊂RS\subset R is allowed to contain zero-divisors.Comment: 29 pages; v.2: final versio
    • 

    corecore