4 research outputs found
Incidence of cognitively defined late-onset Alzheimer\u27s dementia subgroups from a prospective cohort study.
INTRODUCTION: There may be biologically relevant heterogeneity within typical late-onset Alzheimer\u27s dementia.
METHODS: We analyzed cognitive data from people with incident late-onset Alzheimer\u27s dementia from a prospective cohort study. We determined individual averages across memory, visuospatial functioning, language, and executive functioning. We identified domains with substantial impairments relative to that average. We compared demographic, neuropathology, and genetic findings across groups defined by relative impairments.
RESULTS: During 32,286 person-years of follow-up, 869 people developed Alzheimer\u27s dementia. There were 393 (48%) with no domain with substantial relative impairments. Some participants had isolated relative impairments in memory (148, 18%), visuospatial functioning (117, 14%), language (71, 9%), and executive functioning (66, 8%). The group with isolated relative memory impairments had higher proportions with ≥ APOE ε4 allele, more extensive Alzheimer\u27s-related neuropathology, and higher proportions with other Alzheimer\u27s dementia genetic risk variants.
DISCUSSION: A cognitive subgrouping strategy may identify biologically distinct subsets of people with Alzheimer\u27s dementia
An Integrated Framework for Optimizing CO<sub>2</sub> Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery
CO<sub>2</sub>-enhanced oil recovery (CO<sub>2</sub>-EOR) is a
technique for commercially producing oil from depleted reservoirs
by injecting CO<sub>2</sub> along with water. Because a large portion
of the injected CO<sub>2</sub> remains in place, CO<sub>2</sub>-EOR
is an option for permanently sequestering CO<sub>2</sub>. This study
develops a generic integrated framework for optimizing CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration and enhanced oil recovery based on known parameter
distributions for a depleted oil reservoir in Texas. The framework
consists of a multiphase reservoir simulator coupled with geologic
and statistical models. An integrated simulation of CO<sub>2</sub>–water–oil flow and reactive transport is conducted,
followed by a global sensitivity and response surface analysis, for
optimizing the CO<sub>2</sub>-EOR process. The results indicate that
the reservoir permeability, porosity, thickness, and depth are the
major intrinsic reservoir parameters that control net CO<sub>2</sub> injection/storage and oil/gas recovery rates. The distance between
injection and production wells and the sequence of alternating CO<sub>2</sub> and water injection are the significant operational parameters
for designing a five-spot CO<sub>2</sub>-EOR pattern that efficiently
produces oil while storing CO<sub>2</sub>. The results from this study
provide useful insights for understanding the potential and uncertainty
of commercial-scale CO<sub>2</sub> sequestrations with a utilization
component
Associations Between Depression, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Cognitively-Defined Late-Onset Alzheimer\u27s Disease Subgroups.
BACKGROUND: There is considerable heterogeneity in clinical presentation among people with late-onset Alzheimer\u27s disease (LOAD). We have categorized people with LOAD into subgroups based on relative impairments across cognitive domains. These 6 groups are people with no relatively impaired domains (AD-No Domains), 4 groups with one relatively impaired domain (AD-Memory, AD-Executive, AD-Language, and AD-Visuospatial), and a group with multiple relatively impaired domains (AD-Multiple Domains). Our previous analysis demonstrated that genetic factors vary across cognitively-defined LOAD groups.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether risks associated with depression and traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (TBI) for cognitively defined LOAD subgroups are similar.
METHODS: We used cognitive data at LOAD diagnosis from three prospective cohort studies to determine cognitively-defined subgroups. We compared subgroups in endorsement of items from the Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale and history of TBI.
RESULTS: Among 1,505 people with LOAD from the three studies, there were substantial differences across subgroups in total CES-D score, with lower scores (less depression) for people with AD with relative impairments in memory (AD-Memory) compared to those in other groups. Differences were noteworthy for the sleep-related item of the CES-D, as people with AD-Memory were less likely to report restless sleep than people in other groups. There were no differences in TBI history across groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in risk factor associations across subgroups such as differences in endorsement of depression symptoms and restless sleep provide support for the hypothesis that there are biologically coherent subgroups of AD
Genetic data and cognitively defined late-onset Alzheimer’s disease subgroups
Categorizing people with late-onset Alzheimer's disease into biologically
coherent subgroups is important for personalized medicine. We evaluated data from
five studies (total n = 4050, of whom 2431 had genome-wide single-nucleotide
polymorphism (SNP) data). We assigned people to cognitively defined subgroups on
the basis of relative performance in memory, executive functioning, visuospatial
functioning, and language at the time of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. We
compared genotype frequencies for each subgroup to those from cognitively normal
elderly controls. We focused on APOE and on SNPs with p < 10-5 and odds ratios
more extreme than those previously reported for Alzheimer's disease (<0.77 or
>1.30). There was substantial variation across studies in the proportions of
people in each subgroup. In each study, higher proportions of people with
isolated substantial relative memory impairment had ≥1 APOE ε4 allele than any
other subgroup (overall p = 1.5 × 10-27). Across subgroups, there were 33 novel
suggestive loci across the genome with p < 10-5 and an extreme OR compared to
controls, of which none had statistical evidence of heterogeneity and 30 had ORs
in the same direction across all datasets. These data support the biological
coherence of cognitively defined subgroups and nominate novel genetic loci.R01 AG042437/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
R01 AG029672/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
K23 AG046377/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
U01 AG042904/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
P30 AG010133/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
R01 AG019771/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
P50 AG005136/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
K01 AG050699/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
P50 AG005133/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
R01 AG030653/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
R01 AG041718/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
R01 AG017917/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
U01 AG032984/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
R01 AG030146/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
U01 AG006781/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging)/
U01 HG006375/U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)/
P50 AG005136/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
P50 AG005133/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
K23 AG046377/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United State