8 research outputs found

    Tourniquet Use Does Not Affect Pain and Function after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Evaluation According to Pain Threshold

    No full text
    We evaluated the effect of using a tourniquet on early-stage pain and 1-year postoperative functional outcomes when patients were divided into two groups according to the pain threshold (PT). Overall, 120 patients who were assessed preoperatively with an algometer were recruited for this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a tourniquet (group 1, 60 patients) and without tourniquet (group 2, 60 patients). Primary outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively and functional assessment with Knee Society Score (KSS) test at 1 year postoperatively. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of gender (49 females and 8 males in group 1 vs. 53 females and 6 males in group 2; p = 0.201) and age (68.9 years in group 1 vs. 68.7 years in group 2; p = 0.811). There was no significant difference between groups in all the VAS and KSS 1 and KSS 2 scores. PT measurements ranged from 2.5 to 11.5 with a mean of 7.69 +/- 1.70 and a median of 8. Total 54 patients with a median value of = 8 were defined as the high-PT group. When the groups were evaluated according to using the tourniquet, 21 patients were operated on with a tourniquet and 33 patients without it in the low-PT group, while 36 patients were operated on with a tourniquet and 26 patients without it in the high-PT group. There was no significant difference in pain or functional scores between patients when comparing with-tourniquet and without-tourniquet or when comparing the low- and high-PT groups. This showed that the use of a tourniquet during TKA was not associated with either early-stage pain or 1-year postoperative functional outcomes according to algometer evaluation. Level of evidence: Level 1 prospective randomized study

    Quality of Life Evaluation Following Limb Lengthening Surgery in Patients with Achondroplasia

    No full text
    Background The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of life following limb lengthening surgery in patients with achondroplasia. The complications and different lengthening techniques have and effects on mid-term results were also investigated. Methods We performed a retrospective, multicenter study by evaluating the records of patients with achondroplasia operated in our clinic between 1999 and 2014 for limb lengthening with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Forty nine patients were underwent bilateral lower limb lengthening surgery and 21 of 49 patients underwent bilateral humerus lengthening surgery. Patients were evaluated by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of children. Twenty patients with achondroplasia who had no lengthening surgery history were also evaluated with the PedsQL score as the control group. Results The average age at the time of first surgery was 6.17 years. The average follow-up period was 100.2 months. The average age at the time of study 14.70 +/- 2.44 (11-18) years. There were significant differences between the patients with humeral lengthening and patients who did not undergo humeral lengthening in all scores. Transient complications had minimal effects on scores. Although all scores in the operated group were higher than non-operated patients with achondroplasia, there were no significant differences. Conclusion Quality of life was significantly improved as a result of humerus lengthening surgery of patients with achondroplasia, despite minor complications compared with Lower limb lengthening surgery
    corecore