12 research outputs found

    Prospective, Same-Day, Direct Comparison of Controlled Attenuation Parameter With the M vs the XL Probe in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction as the Standard.

    No full text
    Background & aimsControlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurements using M probe have been reported to be lower than those of the XL-probe in detection of hepatic steatosis. However, there has been no direct comparison of CAP with the M vs the XL probe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We compared CAP with the M vs the XL probe for quantification of hepatic fat content, using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the standard.MethodsWe performed a prospective study of 100 adults (mean body mass index [BMI], 30.6 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with and without NAFLD, assessed by CAP with the M probe and XL probe on the same day, at a single research center, from November 2017 through November 2018. We then measured the MRI-PDFF as the reference standard. Outcomes were presence of hepatic steatosis, defined as MRI-PDFF ≄ 5%, and detection of hepatic fat content ≄ 10%, defined as MRI-PDFF ≄ 10%. We performed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CAP for each probe in detection of hepatic steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≄ 5%) and of hepatic fat content ≄ 10%.ResultsOf the study participants, 68% had an MRI-PDFF of 5% or more and 48% had an MRI-PDFF of 10% or more. The mean CAP measured by the M probe (310 ± 62 db/m) was significantly lower than by the X probe (317 ± 63 db/m) (P = .007). When M probe was used in participants with BMIs <30 kg/m2 and XL probe in participants with BMIs ≄30 kg/m2, the CAP measured by the M probe (312 ± 51.4 db/m) remained significantly lower than that of the XL probe (345 ± 47.6 db/m) (P = .0035.), when the MRI-PDFF was above 5%. The optimal threshold of CAP for the detection of MRI-PDFF≄5%, was 294 db/m with the M probe and 307 db/m with the XL probe. The optimal threshold of CAP for the detection of MRI-PDFF ≄ 10%, was 311 db/m with the M probe and 322 db/m with the XL probe. For only the XL probe, CAP measurements with an interquartile range below 30 dB/m detected an MRI-PDFF≄5% with a lower AUROC (0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.00) than CAP measurements with an interquartile range above 30 dB/m (AUROC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90) (P = .0129).ConclusionsIn an analysis of the same patients using CAP with the M probe and XL probe, with MRI-PDFF as the standard, we found that the M probe under-quantifies CAP values compared with the XL probe, independent of BMI. The type of probe should be considered when interpreting CAP data from patients with NAFLD

    Optimal Threshold of Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Detection of HIV-Associated NAFLD With Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Reference Standard.

    No full text
    BackgroundControlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is an ultrasound-based point-of-care method to quantify liver fat; however, the optimal threshold for CAP to detect pathologic liver fat among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PLWH) is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify the diagnostic accuracy and optimal threshold of CAP for the detection of liver-fat among PLWH with magnetic resonance imaging proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard.MethodsPatients from a prospective single-center cohort of PLWH at risk for HIV-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who underwent contemporaneous MRI-PDFF and CAP assessment were included. Subjects with other forms of liver disease including viral hepatitis and excessive alcohol intake were excluded. Receiver operatic characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the optimal threshold for the detection of HIV-associated NAFLD (liver fat ≄ 5%).ResultsSeventy PLWH (90% men) at risk for NAFLD were included. The mean (± standard deviation) age and body mass index were 48.6 (±10.2) years and 30 (± 5.3) kg/m2, respectively. The prevalence of HIV-associated NAFLD (MRI-PDFF ≄ 5%) was 80%. The M and XL probes were used for 56% and 44% of patients, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of CAP for the detection of MRI-PDFF ≄ 5% was 0.82 (0.69-0.95) at the cut-point of 285 dB/m. The positive predictive value of CAP ≄ 285 dB/m was 93.2% in this cohort with sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 78.6%.ConclusionsThe optimal cut-point of CAP to correctly identify HIV-associated NAFLD was 285 dB/m, is similar to previously published cut-point for primary NAFLD and may be incorporated into routine care to identify patients at risk of HIV-associated NAFLD

    A gut microbiome signature for cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

    No full text
    Development of cirrhosis in individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease can predict mortality. Here the authors used a unique twin and family cohort to identify a gut microbiome-derived 16sRNA signature that can detect cirrhosis in individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

    MRI Assessment of Treatment Response in HIV‐associated NAFLD: A Randomized Trial of a Stearoyl‐Coenzyme‐A‐Desaturase‐1 Inhibitor (ARRIVE Trial)

    No full text
    Aramchol, an oral stearoyl-coenzyme-A-desaturase-1 inhibitor, has been shown to reduce hepatic fat content in patients with primary nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); however, its effect in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated NAFLD is unknown. The aramchol for HIV-associated NAFLD and lipodystrophy (ARRIVE) trial was a double-blind, randomized, investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of 12 weeks of treatment with aramchol versus placebo in HIV-associated NAFLD. Fifty patients with HIV-associated NAFLD, defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) ≄5%, were randomized to receive either aramchol 600 mg daily (n = 25) or placebo (n = 25) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in hepatic fat as measured by MRI-PDFF in colocalized regions of interest. Secondary endpoints included changes in liver stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and exploratory endpoints included changes in total-body fat and muscle depots on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), whole-body MRI, and cardiac MRI. The mean (± standard deviation) of age and body mass index were 48.2 Â± 10.3 years and 30.7 Â± 4.6 kg/m2 , respectively. There was no difference in the reduction in mean MRI-PDFF between the aramchol group at -1.3% (baseline MRI-PDFF 15.6% versus end-of-treatment MRI-PDFF 14.4%, P = 0.24) and the placebo group at -1.4% (baseline MRI-PDFF 13.3% versus end-of-treatment MRI-PDFF 11.9%, P = 0.26). There was no difference in the relative decline in mean MRI-PDFF between the aramchol and placebo groups (6.8% versus 1.1%, P = 0.68). There were no differences in MRE-derived and VCTE-derived liver stiffness and whole-body (fat and muscle) composition analysis by MRI or DXA. Compared to baseline, end-of-treatment aminotransferases were lower in the aramchol group but not in the placebo arm. There were no significant adverse events. Conclusion: Aramchol, over a 12-week period, did not reduce hepatic fat or change body fat and muscle composition by using MRI-based assessment in patients with HIV-associated NAFLD (clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT02684591)
    corecore