An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction

There has been an increasing need for the terminology on the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction to be collated in a clinically based consensus report.This Report combines the input of members and elected nominees of the Standardization and Terminology Committees of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by many external referees. An extensive process of nine rounds of internal and external review was developed to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus). Before opening up for comments on the webpages of ICS and IUGA, five experts from physiotherapy, neurology, urology, urogynecology, and nursing were invited to comment on the paper.A Terminology Report on the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction, encompassing over 200 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically based, with the most common symptoms, signs, assessments, diagnoses, and treatments defined. Clarity and ease of use have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction. Ongoing review is not only anticipated, but will be required to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible.A consensus-based terminology report for the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction has been produced, aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and a stimulus for research

Prevalence and triage of first-contact complaints on pelvic floor dysfunctions in female patients at a Pelvic Care Centre

Aims(i) To describe and analyse pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms in women referred to a Pelvic Care Centre (PCC). (ii) To describe the triage process of the same patients based on response to a first-contact interview. MethodsTriage started with a telephone interview using previously constructed questions, asking for seven types of PF complaints during the preceding 6 months. If present, complaint severity was registered on a 0-10 scale. Next, these first-contact complaints were used to describe patient case mix profiles using cross-tabular analysis. Later on, at first PCC visit, an intake questionnaire containing questions on specific PF health problem(s) was filled out. This procedure contributed to a firm baseline characterization of the individual patient profile and a clinically valid allocation to structured, predefined assessment, and treatment. ResultsFrom 2005 to 2013, 4473 first-time patients (mean age 56.9 (SD 16.2) have been referred to the PCC. Most frequently mentioned complaints: voiding dysfunction (59.5%), urinary incontinence (46.6%), prolapse (41.1%), fecal incontinence (15.1%), constipation (12.6%), and sexual problems (4.6%). A first appointment to a single specialist was determined in 3.110 (69.5%) patients, in 1.192 (26.7%) consultation of >1 specialist. Data analysis revealed higher-order interactions between PF complaints, suggesting patient profile complexity and patient population heterogeneity. ConclusionsMore than one out of four PCC patients showed multifactorial problems, needing >1 specialist. PF complaints either turned out to stand alone or cluster with others, or even to strengthen, weaken, nullify, or inverse relationships. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:503-508, 2016

Prevalence and triage of first contact pelvic floor dysfunction complaints in male patients referred to a Pelvic Care Centre

Aims(i) To describe and analyse pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms in men referred to a Pelvic Care Centre (PCC). (ii) To describe the triage process of the same patients based on response to a first-contact interview. MethodsTriage started with a telephone interview using previously constructed questions, asking for six types of PF complaints during the preceding 6 months. If present, complaint severity was registered on a 0-10 scale. Next, these first-contact complaints were used to describe patient case mix profiles using cross-tabular analysis. Later on, at first PCC visit, an intake questionnaire regarding specific PF health problem(s) was filled out. This procedure contributed to a firm baseline characterization of the individual patient profile and a clinically valid allocation to structured, predefined assessment and treatment. ResultsFrom 2005 to 2013 985 first-time patients (mean age 58.2 years (SD 15.3) have been referred to the PCC. Most frequently mentioned complaints: voiding dysfunctions (73.9%), urinary incontinence (29.5%), sexual problems (16.6%), faecal incontinence (13.9%), constipation (9.6%), and prolapse (0.3%). A first appointment to a single specialist was determined in 805 (81.7%) patients, in 137 (13.9%) consultation of >1 specialist. Data analysis revealed higher-order interactions between PF complaints, suggesting patient profile complexity and patient population heterogeneity. ConclusionsOne out of seven PCC patients showed multifactorial problems, needing >1 specialist. PF complaints either turned out to stand alone or cluster with others, or even to strengthen, weaken, nullify or inverse relationships. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:487-491, 2016

Peri-operative physiotherapy to prevent recurrent symptoms and treatment following prolapse surgery: supported by evidence or not?

To provide a clinical opinion based on current literature reporting on the effects of peri-operative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on postoperative pelvic floor symptoms, recurrent treatment after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery and current clinical practice in the Netherlands. The PubMed database was searched, with dates from 1966 to May 2012, for all types of studies reporting on the effects of peri-operative PFMT on recurrent treatment and/or pelvic floor symptoms after POP surgery. Also, current clinical practice in the Netherlands was evaluated. Two small randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with differences in the population included, were identified. The first RCT concluded that peri-operative PFMT reduced the risk of pelvic floor symptoms 12 weeks after surgery and improved the quality of life. The second trial concluded that there is no significant beneficial effect 12 months after surgery. However, when looking at the reported outcomes in this trial micturition symptoms and quality of life improved more in the treatment group too. Studies evaluating whether peri-operative PFMT reduced the rate of recurrent treatment for POP-related symptoms, were not identified. This lack of evidence reflects the current clinical practice, as most gynaecologists do not offer peri-operative PFMT to their patients. Peri-operative PFMT may reduce the risk of pelvic floor symptoms and improve the quality of life after POP surgery, although evidence is insufficient to implement this in current clinical practice. Since the results of the two RCTs on this topic are promising, there is an urgent need for robust, well-designed trials to evaluate the efficacy and (cost-)effectiveness of peri-operative PFM

Urinary incontinence during pregnancy:prevalence, experience of bother, beliefs, and help-seeking behavior

Introduction and hypothesis Pregnancy and delivery are thought to induce urinary incontinence (UI), but its clinical impact is less known. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of self-reported UI, level of experience of bother, and beliefs to gain a greater understanding of help-seeking behavior in adult pregnant women. Methods A digital survey shared on social media was used for recruitment. The survey consists of: (1) demographic variables, (2) International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF), (3) ICIQ Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol), and (4) questions on beliefs and help-seeking behavior. For analysis, descriptive statistics and the independent samples t-test were used to determine differences between help- and non-help-seekers. Results Four hundred seven women were eligible for data analysis. The prevalence of UI rises from 55.1% in the first to 70.1% in the third trimester, with an overall prevalence of 66.8%. Nearly 43.0% of the respondents reported UI occurring once a week or less; 92.5% of women lost a small amount; 90% reported slight to moderate impact on quality of life. Only 13.1% of the respondents sought help for their UI. The main reasons for not seeking help were: minimal bother and the idea that UI would resolve by itself. Help-seeking women showed significantly higher scores than non-help-seeking women regarding ICIQ-UI SF (p <0.001), ICIQ-LUTSqol (

Female double incontinence: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors from the SABE (Health, Wellbeing and Aging) study

Introduction and hypothesis Double Incontinence (DI) is incontinence of urine and stool and is an extreme manifestation of pelvic floor dysfunction. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and incidence of DI and the risk factors in elderly women in So Paulo, Brazil. Methods This was a prospective study in women aged 65 years or older evaluated in 2006 and re-evaluated in 2010. The sample was selected by two-phase stratified sampling with replacement and probability proportional to size. The likelihood ratio test was performed and Cox regression curves were generated to evaluate the equality of survival. Poisson's regression was used to evaluate risk factors. Results This is the first study on the incidence of DI in elderly women. A total of 864 elderly women were interviewed in 2006. The prevalence rate of DI was 4.9%. The incidence rate of DI in the period between 2006 and 2010 was 13.8/1,000 person-years. Associated factors were the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, difficulty with basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), polypharmacy and falls in the last year. Poisson's regression analysis showed that falls in the last year and difficulty with at least three IADL were risk factors for DI. Conclusions The incidence of DI seems to be high in this population. Falls in the last year and difficulty with at least three IADL were identified as risk factors. Preventive measures must be implemented with public health policies to prevent increases in DI.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sect Urogynecol & Pelv Surg, Dept Gynecol, Rua Mato Grosso 128 Cj 71, BR-01239040 Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Social Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Nursing, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Sao Paulo, BrazilMaastricht Univ, Pelv Care Ctr Maastricht, Med Ctr, Maastricht, NetherlandsUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Sect Urogynecol & Pelv Surg, Dept Gynecol, Rua Mato Grosso 128 Cj 71, BR-01239040 Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Effectiveness of involving a nurse specialist for patients with urinary incontinence in primary care: results of a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) primary care management is substandard, offering care rather than cure despite the existence of guidelines that help to improve cure. Involving nurse specialists on incontinence in general practice could be a way to improve care for UI patients. Aims: We studied whether involving nurse specialists on UI in general practice reduced severity and impact of UI. Methods: Between 2005 and 2008 a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial was performed comparing a 1-year intervention by trained nurse specialists with care-as-usual after initial diagnosis and assessment by general practitioners in adult patients with stress, urgency or mixed UI in four Dutch regions (Maastricht, Nijmegen, Helmond, The Hague). Simple randomisation was computer-generated with allocation concealment. Analysis was performed by intention-to-treat principles. Main outcome measure was the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) severity sum score. Results: A total of 186 patients followed the intervention and 198 received care-as-usual. Patients in both study groups improved significantly in UI severity and impact on health-related quality of life. After correction for effect modifiers [type of UI, body mass index (BMI)], we found significant differences between groups in favour of the intervention group at 3 months (p = 0.04); no differences were found in the 1-year linear trend (p = 0.15). Patients in the intervention group without baseline anxiety/depression improved significantly better compared with care-as-usual after 1 year (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Involving nurse specialists in care for UI patients supplementary to general practitioners can improve severity and impact of UI, after correction for effect modifiers. This is also the case in specific situations such as anxiety/depression