Revision of reversed shoulder arthroplasty : is a reoperation possible?

Introduction. As the number of reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures increases, the revision rate will also increase. In case of severe bone insufficiency, instability or infection of the primary RSA, revision to another RSA is preferable but not always possible. Hemiarthroplasty (HA), spacers and resection arthroplasty (RA) have been described in this indication. Materials and methods. Between 2004 and 2016, 20 shoulders in 19 patientswere treated at Ghent University Hospital for failed revision of RSA. Nine received a megahead prosthesis, a spacerwas implanted in 6, and 5 underwent RA. Results. Indications for implantation of a megahead prosthesis were loosening RSA (n = 5), infection (n = 4), dislocation (n = 1) and nerve irritation (n = 1). Improvement of range ofmotionwas observed. Anterosuperior migration of the prosthesis was noted in 2 patients. Another 2 patients were ultimately revised to RSA. Seven permanent spacerswere implanted for infection, of which 2 remain in place till today. The other 5 were revised to RSA. Of the 5 patients treated with RA, 3 were revised further on to RSA, resulting in pain relief and regain of function. Discussion. Our study shows that amegahead prosthesis has better functional results than RA, but is inferior to RSA. Due to increasing surgical experience and improving technique, 9 patients could ultimately be reconverted to another RSA. A review of current literature is presented. In HA and RA, the functional results are poor, and pain relief is uncertain. Results of spacers are variable and can be satisfactory. Arthrodesis is a last resort. Conclusion. In our case series study, a hemiarthroplasty can be performed in case of failure of RSA. However, the results are inferior to another RSA

Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis

Methods An average and a "worst case scenario" shape in A-P view in a 2-D computer model of a scapula was created, using data from 200 "normal" scapulae, so that the position of the glenoid and humeral component could be changed as well as design features such as depth of the polyethylene insert, the size of glenosphere, the position of the center of rotation, and downward glenoid inclination. The model calculated the maximum adduction (notch angle) in the scapular plane when the cup of the humeral component was in conflict with the scapula. Results A change in humeral neck shaft inclination from 155 degrees to 145 degrees gave a 10 degrees gain in notch angle. A change in cup depth from 8 mm to 5 mm gave a gain of 12 degrees. With no inferior prosthetic overhang, a lateralization of the center of rotation from 0 mm to 5 mm gained 16 degrees. With an inferior overhang of only 1 mm, no effect of lateralizing the center of rotation was noted. Downward glenoid inclination of 0 boolean OR to 10 boolean OR gained 10 degrees. A change in glenosphere radius from 18 mm to 21 mm gained 31 degrees due to the inferior overhang created by the increase in glenosphere. A prosthetic overhang to the bone from 0 mm to 5 mm gained 39 degrees. Interpretation Of all 6 solutions tested, the prosthetic overhang created the biggest gain in notch angle and this should be considered when designing the reverse arthroplasty and defining optimal surgical technique

Radiological AP-view analysis of the shoulder with cuff tear arthropathy

C

A Critical Review on Prosthetic Features Available for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty is a popular treatment in rotator cuff arthropathy and in displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly. In 2016, 29 models of commercially available designs express this popularity. This study describes all the different design parameters available on the market. Prosthetic differences are found for the baseplate, glenosphere, polyethylene, and humeral component and these differences need to be weighed out carefully for each patient knowing that a gain in one mechanical parameter can balance the loss of another. Patient specific implants may help in the future

Reversed revised: what to do when it goes wrong ?

Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has well known indications and good to excellent results are described in the literature. When the arthroplasty fails however, revision remains a technical challenge with many questions unanswered. To analyse retrospectively and consecutively the indications and results of primary RTSA-revision. All patients that underwent revision RTSA between 2004 and 2009 were included. Indications for surgery, surgical details and clinical evaluation with the pre- and postoperative Constant-score (CS) were analyzed. 37 Revisions (37 patients) of RTSA were analysed with an average follow up of 41.2 months (24-84). Indications were infection (23), glenoid loosening (9), instability (2) malpositioning (2) and suprascapular nerve irritation (1). 25 patients obtained a one-stage conversion to a new reversed prosthesis; 4 patients obtained a two-stage revision; 8 patients got a mega-head prosthesis. No difference in reinfection rate is seen between one- and two stage techniques. An overall lower CS is seen for the mega-head prosthesis. Conclusions : The main indication for revision was infection. Revision of RTSA to a new reversed prosthesis is to prefer even when several procedures are necessary in one patient. When this is impossible, a mega-head prosthesis is to consider and gives reasonable results

What do standard radiography and clinical examination tell about the shoulder with cuff tear arthropathy?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluates the preoperative conventional anteroposterior radiography and clinical testing in non-operated patients with cuff tear arthropathy. It analyses the radiological findings in relation to the status of the rotator cuff and clinical status as also the clinical testing in relation to the rotator cuff quality. The aim of the study is to define the usefulness of radiography and clinical examination in cuff tear arthropathy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study analyses the preoperative radiological (AP-view, (Artro-)CT-scan or MRI-scan) and clinical characteristics (Constant-Murley-score plus active and passive mobility testing) and the peroperative findings in a cohort of 307 patients. These patients were part of a multicenter, retrospective, consecutive study of the French Orthopaedic Society (SOFCOT-2006). All patients had no surgical antecedents and were all treated with prosthetic shoulder surgery for a painful irreparable cuff tear arthropathy (reverse-(84%) or hemi-(8%) or double cup-bipolar prosthesis (8%)).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A positive significancy could be found for the relationship between clinical testing and the rotator cuff quality; between acromiohumeral distance and posterior rotator cuff quality; between femoralization and posterior rotator cuff quality.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A conventional antero-posterior radiograph can not provide any predictive information on the clinical status of the patient.</p> <p>The subscapular muscle can be well tested by the press belly test and the teres minor muscle can be well tested by the hornblower' sign and by the exorotation lag signs.</p> <p>The upward migration index and the presence of femoralization are good indicators for the evaluation of the posterior rotator cuff.</p> <p>An inferior coracoid tip positioning suggests rotator cuff disease.</p