14 research outputs found

    Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ED Adult Psychiatric Visits

    No full text

    Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection in Emergency Department Patients is Rare

    No full text
    Introduction: Aortic dissection is a rare event. While the most frequent symptom is chest pain, that is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint and other diseases causing chest pain occur much more often. Furthermore, 20% of dissections are without chest pain and 6% are painless. For these reasons, diagnosing dissections may be challenging. Our goal was to determine the number of total ED and atraumatic chest pain patients for every aortic dissection diagnosed by emergency physicians.Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: 33 suburban and urban New York and New Jersey EDs with annual visits between 8,000 and 80,000. Participants: Consecutive patients seen by emergency physicians from 1-1-1996 through 12-31-2010. Observations: We identified aortic dissection and atraumatic chest pain patients using the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and Clinical Modification codes. We then calculated the number of total ED and atraumatic chest pain patients for every aortic dissection, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: From a database of 9.5 million ED visits, we identified 782 aortic dissections or one for every 12,200 (95% CI [11,400-13,100]) visits. The mean age of dissection patients was 66±16 years and 38% were female. There were 763,000 (8%) with atraumatic chest pain diagnoses. Thus, there is one dissection for every 980 (95% CI [910-1,050]) atraumatic chest pain patients.Conclusion: The diagnosis of aortic dissections by emergency physicians is rare and challenging. An emergency physician seeing 3,000 to 4,000 patients a year would diagnose an aortic dissection approximately every three to four years

    Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection in Emergency Department Patients is Rare

    No full text
    Introduction: Aortic dissection is a rare event. While the most frequent symptom is chest pain, that is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint and other diseases causing chest pain occur much more often. Furthermore, 20% of dissections are without chest pain and 6% are painless. For these reasons, diagnosing dissections may be challenging. Our goal was to determine the number of total ED and atraumatic chest pain patients for every aortic dissection diagnosed by emergency physicians. Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: 33 suburban and urban New York and New Jersey EDs with annual visits between 8,000 and 80,000. Participants: Consecutive patients seen by emergency physicians from 1-1-1996 through 12-31-2010. Observations: We identified aortic dissection and atraumatic chest pain patients using the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and Clinical Modification codes. We then calculated the number of total ED and atraumatic chest pain patients for every aortic dissection, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: From a database of 9.5 million ED visits, we identified 782 aortic dissections or one for every 12,200 (95% CI [11,400-13,100]) visits. The mean age of dissection patients was 66±16 years and 38% were female. There were 763,000 (8%) with atraumatic chest pain diagnoses. Thus, there is one dissection for every 980 (95% CI [910-1,050]) atraumatic chest pain patients. Conclusion: The diagnosis of aortic dissections by emergency physicians is rare and challenging. An emergency physician seeing 3,000 to 4,000 patients a year would diagnose an aortic dissection approximately every three to four years

    Placement of central venous lines for sepsis in the elderly has markedly increased—Evidence from a cohort of New Jersey (USA) emergency departments

    No full text
    Background: Early goal directed therapy for sepsis patients requires placement of central lines (CVPL) to measure central pressure. Objective: We hypothesized that the percentage of CVPL placed for sepsis has increased over time, whereas the frequency of lines placed for other conditions has not changed. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Investigators analyzed records from consecutive ED patients in nine hospitals over a 10-year period. Patients >65 years identified with CVPL by CPT codes and diagnoses established by ICD-9 codes.We computed the annual number of patients that had a CVPL placed for sepsis and other conditions. We calculated the change from 2005 and 2014 in the normalized number of patients >65 with sepsis and other conditions and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).We normalized the annual number of CVPLs by the average number of total annual visits for those >65 years as the annual visits in the >65 years cohort increased by > 25% over the course of the study. We then plotted the annual number of normalized CVPLs for sepsis and other conditions placed versus year and computed the linear regression coefficients (R2). Alpha was set at 0.05. Results: Of the 3,772520 visits in the data base there were 711,435 visits by patients >65 years; 3184 (0.45%) had CVPL placed and 784 of those patients were treated for sepsis. The percent of patients with CVPL for sepsis increased 212% (95% CI: 115% to 356%) from 2005 to 2014, but there was no statistically significant annual change in percent of CVPL placed for other conditions (10% decrease, 95% CI: −26% to 9%). The linear regression coefficient for the plot of annual normalized number of CVPLs vs. year (See table and plot) was statistically significant for sepsis (R2 = 0.94, p < 0.001) but not for other conditions (R2 = 0.09, p = 0.80). Conclusion: We found that CVPL placed for sepsis tripled from 2004 to 2011, whereas CVPL placed for other conditions did not change significantly. Keywords: Central line, Sepsi
    corecore