7 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Interactive Education is Associated With Lower Incidence of Pedestrian-Related Injury in Children
BackgroundPedestrian-related injuries are a significant contributor to preventable mortality and disability in children. We hypothesized that interactive pedestrian safety education is associated with increased knowledge, safe crosswalk behaviors, and lower incidence of pedestrian-related injuries in elementary school-aged children.MethodsAn interactive street-crossing simulation was implemented at target elementary schools in Los Angeles County beginning in 2009. Mixed-methods were used to evaluate the impact of this intervention. Multiple-choice examinations were used to test pedestrian safety knowledge, anonymous observations were used to assess street-crossing behaviors, and statewide traffic records were used to report pedestrian injuries in elementary school-aged (4-11 y) children in participating school districts. Pedestrian injury incidence was compared 1 y before and after the intervention, standardized to the incidence in the entire City of Los Angeles.ResultsA total of 1424 and 1522 children completed the pretest and post-test, respectively. Correct answers increased for nine of ten questions (all P < 0.01). Children more frequently looked both ways before crossing the street after the intervention (10% versus 41%, P < 0.001). There were 6 reported pedestrian-related injuries in intervention school districts in the year before the intervention and 2 injuries in the year after the intervention, resulting in a significantly lower injury incidence (standardized rate ratio 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.73).ConclusionPedestrian safety education at Los Angeles elementary schools was associated with increased knowledge, safe street-crossing behavior, and lower incidence of pediatric pedestrian-related injury. Formal pedestrian safety education should be considered with injury prevention efforts in similar urban communities
Recommended from our members
Symptomatic catheter-associated thrombosis in pediatric trauma patients: Choose your access wisely
BackgroundTraumatic injury and the presence of a central venous catheter are 2 of the strongest risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of symptomatic, catheter-associated thrombosis in critically injured children. We hypothesized that femoral venous catheters are associated with a greater rate of thrombotic complications when compared with all other central venous access points.MethodsWe reviewed a retrospective cohort (2006-2016) of injured children (≤18 years) admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit with central access placed ≤7 days from admission. Symptomatic, catheter-associated thrombosis was determined by radiographic evidence. Poisson regression was used to compare the incidence of catheter-associated thrombosis per 1,000 catheter days between femoral and nonfemoral catheters. All comparisons were 2-tailed with α = 0.05.ResultsWe examined 209 pediatric trauma patients with central access (65% femoral, 19% subclavian, 11% arm vein, and 5% internal jugular). Femoral catheters were removed earlier (median [interquartile range] 4 [2-7] vs 8 [3-12] days, P < .001) and were larger in diameter (5 Fr [4-7] vs 4 Fr [4-4], P < .001) when compared with all other catheters. Catheter-associated thrombosis was more frequent in femoral versus nonfemoral catheters (18.4 vs 3.5 per 1,000 catheter days, P = .01).ConclusionFemoral venous catheters are associated with a greater incidence of symptomatic, catheter-associated thrombosis in pediatric trauma patients. When central venous access is indicated for injured children, the femoral site should be avoided. If a femoral venous catheter is necessary, use of a smaller catheter should be considered
Recommended from our members
Parenteral Nutrition Use in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Is Associated with More Frequent Complications: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Using the National Trauma Data Bank
Impact of simulation-based training on perceived provider confidence in acute multidisciplinary pediatric trauma resuscitation
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Purpose: Simulation-based training has the potential to improve team-based care. We hypothesized that implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary simulation-based training program would improve provider confidence in team-based management of severely injured pediatric trauma patients. Methods: An in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program with structured debriefing was implemented at a free-standing children’s hospital. Trauma providers were anonymously surveyed 1 month before (pre-), 1 month after (post-), and 2 years after implementation. Results: Survey response rate was 49% (n = 93/190) pre-simulation, 22% (n = 42/190) post-simulation, and 79% (n = 150/190) at 2-year follow-up. These providers reported more anxiety (p = 0.01) and less confidence (p = 0.02) 1-month post-simulation. At 2-year follow-up, trained providers reported less anxiety (p = 0.02) and greater confidence (p = 0.01), compared to untrained providers. Conclusions: Implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program may initially lead to increased anxiety, but long-term exposure may lead to greater confidence. Level of evidence: II, Prospective cohort
Recommended from our members
Impact of simulation-based training on perceived provider confidence in acute multidisciplinary pediatric trauma resuscitation
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Purpose: Simulation-based training has the potential to improve team-based care. We hypothesized that implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary simulation-based training program would improve provider confidence in team-based management of severely injured pediatric trauma patients. Methods: An in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program with structured debriefing was implemented at a free-standing children’s hospital. Trauma providers were anonymously surveyed 1 month before (pre-), 1 month after (post-), and 2 years after implementation. Results: Survey response rate was 49% (n = 93/190) pre-simulation, 22% (n = 42/190) post-simulation, and 79% (n = 150/190) at 2-year follow-up. These providers reported more anxiety (p = 0.01) and less confidence (p = 0.02) 1-month post-simulation. At 2-year follow-up, trained providers reported less anxiety (p = 0.02) and greater confidence (p = 0.01), compared to untrained providers. Conclusions: Implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program may initially lead to increased anxiety, but long-term exposure may lead to greater confidence. Level of evidence: II, Prospective cohort