4 research outputs found

    Anisotropic Photophysical Properties of Highly Aligned Crystalline Structures of a Bulky Substituted Poly(thiophene)

    No full text
    The photophysical properties of a phenyl-substituted poly­(thiophene), poly­(3-(2,5-dioctylphenyl)­thiophene) (PDOPT), were studied as a function of polarization and degree of orientation of the crystalline structure. Under well-chosen controlled conditions, large-sized spherulitic crystals of PDOPT were successfully prepared from the melt. From polarized optical microscopy and X-ray diffraction, the molecular orientation of PDOPT within the spherulite was determined, indicating that the fastest growth direction of the spherulite was the <i>a</i>-axis. This implied that crystallization of PDOPT was directed by the packing of the side chains rather than the backbones, which are significantly separated. As the crystalline lamellae were all radially oriented, the local absorbance strongly depended on the polarization of the incoming light. Compared to randomly oriented crystals in a quenched and thus rapidly crystallized sample, PDOPT spherulites displayed red-shifted absorption and emission spectra, combined with a reduced photoluminescence quantum yield. Even for these markedly separated polymer backbones (1.47 nm), the reduced photoluminescence suggests an enhancement of interchain interactions of highly ordered bulky substituted polythiophene induced by crystallization

    Stabilization of Nuclei of Lamellar Polymer Crystals: Insights from a Comparison of the Hoffman–Weeks Line with the Crystallization Line

    No full text
    We have studied melting of poly­(butylene succinate), isothermally crystallized over a wide temperature range, employing a combination of the Hoffman–Weeks plot and the Gibbs–Thomson crystallization line, determined by small-angle X-ray scattering measurements. A change in the slope <i><b>α</b></i> of the Hoffman–Weeks (H–W) line, accompanied by a change of the slope of the crystallization line, was observed for crystallization temperatures higher than 110 °C. <i><b>α</b></i> was reaching a value of 1, implying that no intersection point between the H–W line and the <i>T</i><sub><i>m</i></sub> = <i>T</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> line could be obtained. (<i>T</i><sub><i>m</i></sub> is the measured melting temperature and <i>T</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> is the temperature at which the sample was crystallized). This observation was corroborated by the crystallization line, which was found to be parallel to the melting line for <i>T</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> > 110 °C. We relate these changes in slope to different stabilization mechanisms of the secondary nuclei at the growth front of polymer lamellar crystals. For <i>T</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> > 110 °C, secondary nuclei are proposed to be stabilized by coalescence of neighboring nuclei, all having a small width. By contrast, for <i>T</i><sub><i>c</i></sub> > 110 °C, the number density of secondary nuclei is low and thus their coalescence is rare. Accordingly, nuclei are stabilized by growing in size, mainly increasing their width
    corecore