19 research outputs found

    Trace maps for Mackey algebras

    Get PDF
    Let GG be a finite group and RR be a commutative ring. The Mackey algebra ÎĽR(G)\mu_{R}(G) shares a lot of properties with the group algebra RGRG however, there are some differences. For example, the group algebra is a symmetric algebra and this is not always the case for the Mackey algebra. In this paper we present a systematic approach to the question of the symmetricity of the Mackey algebra, by producing symmetric associative bilinear forms for the Mackey algebra. The category of Mackey functors is a closed symmetric monoidal category, so using the formalism of J.P. May for these categories, S. Bouc has defined the so-called Burnside trace. Using this Burnside trace we produce trace maps for Mackey algebras which generalize the usual trace map the group algebras. These trace maps factorise through Burnside algebras. We prove that the Mackey algebra ÎĽR(G)\mu_{R}(G) is a symmetric algebra if and only if the family of Burnside algebras (RB(H))Hâ©˝G(RB(H))_{H\leqslant G} is a family of symmetric algebras with a compatibility condition. As a corollary, we recover the well known fact that over a field of characteristic zero, the Mackey algebra is always symmetric. Over the ring of integers the Mackey algebra of GG is symmetric if and only if the order of GG is square free. Finally, over a field of characteristic p>0p>0 we show that the Mackey algebra is symmetric if and only if the Sylow pp-subgroups of GG are of order 11 or pp.Comment: 21 pages. Second version: minor changes in the introduction and in the organisation of the proofs. The last part is generalized to commutative rings in which all prime except one are invertibl

    Equivalences between blocks of p-local Mackey algebras

    Get PDF
    Let GG be a finite group and (K,O,k)(K,\mathcal{O},k) be a pp-modular system. Let R=OR=\mathcal{O} or kk. There is a bijection between the blocks of the group algebra and the blocks of the so-called pp-local Mackey algebra μR1(G)\mu_{R}^{1}(G). Let bb be a block of RGRG with abelian defect group DD. Let b′b' be its Brauer correspondant in NG(D)N_{G}(D). It is conjectured by Brou\'e that the blocks RGbRGb and RNG(D)b′RN_{G}(D)b' are derived equivalent. Here we look at equivalences between the corresponding blocks of pp-local Mackey algebras. We prove that an analogue of the Brou\'e's conjecture is true for the pp-local Mackey algebras in the following cases: for the principal blocks of pp-nilpotent groups and for blocks with defect 11. We also point out the probable importance of \emph{splendid} equivalences for the Mackey algebras.Comment: 24 pages. Second version. All the part about cohomological Mackey algebra has been remov

    Equivalences between blocks of cohomological Mackey algebras

    Get PDF
    Let GG be a finite group and (K,O,k)(K,\mathcal{O},k) be a pp-modular system "large enough". Let R=OR=\mathcal{O} or kk. There is a bijection between the blocks of the group algebra RGRG and the central primitive idempotents (the blocks) of the so-called cohomological Mackey algebra coÎĽR(G)co\mu_{R}(G). Here, we prove that a so-called permeable derived equivalence between two blocks of group algebras implies the existence of a derived equivalence between the corresponding blocks of cohomological Mackey algebras. In particular, in the context of Brou\'e's abelian defect group conjecture, if two blocks are splendidly derived equivalent, then the corresponding blocks of cohomological Mackey algebras are derived equivalent

    On the wildness of cambrian lattices

    Full text link
    In this note, we investigate the representation type of the cambrian lattices and some other related lattices. The result is expressed as a very simple trichotomy. When the rank of the underlined Coxeter group is at most 2, the lattices are of finite representation type. When the Coxeter group is a reducible group of type A 3 1 , the lattices are of tame representation type. In all the other cases they are of wild representation type

    Intervalles exceptionnels et modernes du treillis de Tamari

    Get PDF
    International audienceIn this article we use the theory of interval-posets recently introduced by Châtel and Pons in order to describe some interesting families of intervals in the Tamari lattices. These families are defined as interval-posets avoiding specific configurations. At first, we consider what we call exceptional interval-posets and show that they correspond to the intervals which are obtained as images of noncrossing trees in the Dendriform operad. We also show that the exceptional intervals are exactly the intervals of the Tamari lattice induced by intervals in the poset of noncrossing partitions. In the second part we introduce the notion of modern and infinitely modern interval-posets. We show that the modern intervals are in bijection with the new intervals of the Tamari lattice in the sense of Chapoton. We deduce an intrinsic characterization of the new intervals in the Tamari lattice. Finally, we consider the family of what we call infinitely modern intervals and we we prove that there are as many infinitely modern interval-posets of size n as there are ternary trees with n inner vertices

    Around evaluations of biset functors

    Get PDF
    corecore