Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?

In their article, Baelani and colleagues surveyed anesthesia providers from African low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to evaluate whether or not the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines are feasible in such resource-constrained settings. The authors report that an alarmingly low percentage of hospitals have the capacity to implement the SSC guidelines in their entirety but a higher percentage are able to implement the majority of SSC guidelines and grade 1 recommendations. In reality, the probability of adherence to SSC guidelines for septic management is even lower than reported, given that the majority of sepsis management in African LMICs is likely performed by non-intensivists outside of intensive care units. Efforts to address the challenges of managing severely ill patients in LMICs have recently been taken on by the World Health Organization. After reviewing available evidence for sepsis management predominantly from high-income countries, a panel of experts developed a consensus-based strategy tailored for resource-limited settings. However, more research that can evaluate the challenges specific to sepsis management in LMICs and not currently addressed by the SSC guidelines is needed. Comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines combined with innovative approaches to sepsis management in LMICs are required to make a meaningful impact on worldwide sepsis survival

Pathogen Detection Using Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma Samples from Patients with Sepsis in Uganda

Metagenomic sequencing is a promising new method for pathogen detection. We aimed to detect pathogens from archived plasma using metagenomic sequencing in a previously well-characterized cohort of 254 predominantly HIV-infected patients with sepsis in Uganda. We used Illumina sequencing and the Chan Zuckerberg ID metagenomics platform to sequence and identify pathogens. On average, each plasma sample yielded 3,404,737 ± 2,201,997 reads (mean ± standard deviation), of which 220,032 ± 416,691 (6.3% ± 8.6%) were identified as nonhuman reads. Using a background model filter, 414 genus-specific pathogen identifications were found in the 254 samples. Nineteen pathogens were previously detected positive by quantitative PCR (qPCR), compared to sequencing, which demonstrated 30.2% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity. Sensitivity was higher for viral pathogens than nonviral pathogens (37% versus 5%). For example, HIV viremia was detected in 69% of samples using qPCR, and sequencing revealed 70% sensitivity and 92% specificity. There were 75 genus-specific potential pathogens identified by sequencing in this cohort, including hepatitis B and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), among several others. qPCR showed a prevalence of hepatitis B and EBV viremia of 17% and 45%, respectively. In-hospital mortality was associated with a lower qPCR threshold cycle value for EBV (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; P < .001) but not for hepatitis B or HIV. In conclusion, a broad range of potential pathogens were identified by metagenomic sequencing in patients with sepsis in Uganda. Unexpectedly high rates of hepatitis B and EBV viremia were found. Whether these viral infections in HIV patients with sepsis are clinically important requires further study

Agreement between physicians and non-physician clinicians in starting antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The scarcity of physicians in sub-Saharan Africa – particularly in rural clinics staffed only by non-physician health workers – is constraining access to HIV treatment, as only they are legally allowed to start antiretroviral therapy in the HIV-positive patient. Here we present a pilot study from Uganda assessing agreement between non-physician clinicians (nurses and clinical officers) and physicians in their decisions as to whether to start therapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted the study at 12 government antiretroviral therapy sites in three regions of Uganda, all of which had staff trained in delivery of antiretroviral therapy using the WHO Integrated Management of Adult and Adolescent Illness guidelines for chronic HIV care. We collected seven key variables to measure patient assessment and the decision as to whether to start antiretroviral therapy, the primary variable of interest being the Final Antiretroviral Therapy Recommendation. Patients saw either a clinical officer or nurse first, and then were screened identically by a blinded physician during the same clinic visit. We measured inter-rater agreement between the decisions of the non-physician health workers and physicians in the antiretroviral therapy assessment variables using simple and weighted Kappa analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Two hundred fifty-four patients were seen by a nurse and physician, while 267 were seen by a clinical officer and physician. The majority (> 50%) in each arm of the study were in World Health Organization Clinical Stages I and II and therefore not currently eligible for antiretroviral therapy according to national antiretroviral therapy guidelines. Nurses and clinical officers both showed moderate to almost perfect agreement with physicians in their Final Antiretroviral Therapy Recommendation (unweighted κ = 0.59 and κ = 0.91, respectively). Agreement was also substantial for nurses versus physicians for assigning World Health Organization Clinical Stage (weighted κ = 0.65), but moderate for clinical officers versus physicians (κ = 0.44).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both nurses and clinical officers demonstrated strong agreement with physicians in deciding whether to initiate antiretroviral therapy in the HIV patient. This could lead to immediate benefits with respect to antiretroviral therapy scale-up and decentralization to rural areas in Uganda, as non-physician clinicians – particularly clinical officers – demonstrated the capacity to make correct clinical decisions to start antiretroviral therapy. These preliminary data warrant more detailed and multicountry investigation into decision-making of non-physician clinicians in the management of HIV disease with antiretroviral therapy, and should lead policy-makers to more carefully explore task-shifting as a shorter-term response to addressing the human resource crisis in HIV care and treatment.</p

Outcomes of World Health Organization–defined Severe Respiratory Distress without Shock in Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sepsis is the leading cause of global mortality and is most often attributed to lower respiratory tract infections and subsequent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (1). The greatest burden of sepsis rests on sub-Saharan Africa, where lower respiratory tract infections account for approximately 390,000 adult deaths each year (2). However, patients from sub-Saharan Africa are underrepresented in sepsis and ARDS research (3). ARDS is difficult to diagnose in low-income countries because it requires often unavailable imaging, mechanical ventilation to set positive end-expiratory pressure and deliver a reliable fraction of inspired oxygen, and arterial blood gases to identify hypoxemia (4). To mitigate this gap, the World Health Organization (WHO) pragmatically defined severe respiratory distress without shock (SRD) in adults as oxygen saturation of less than 90% or a respiratory rate of more than 30 breaths per minute, and a systolic blood pressure over 90 mm Hg in the setting of infection and in the absence of clinical cardiac failure (5). The natural history of SRD has not been fully described; accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of SRD in hospitalized patients in sub-Saharan Africa

Severe sepsis in two Ugandan hospitals: a prospective observational study of management and outcomes in a predominantly HIV-1 infected population.

BACKGROUND:Sepsis likely contributes to the high burden of infectious disease morbidity and mortality in low income countries. Data regarding sepsis management in sub-Saharan Africa are limited. We conducted a prospective observational study reporting the management and outcomes of severely septic patients in two Ugandan hospitals. We describe their epidemiology, management, and clinical correlates for mortality. METHODOLOGY/RESULTS:Three-hundred eighty-two patients fulfilled enrollment criteria for a severe sepsis syndrome. Vital signs, management and laboratory results were recorded. Outcomes measured included in-hospital and post-discharge mortality. Most patients were HIV-infected (320/377, 84.9%) with a median CD4+ T cell (CD4) count of 52 cells/mm(3) (IQR, 16-131 cells/mm(3)). Overall mortality was 43.0%, with 23.7% in-hospital mortality (90/380) and 22.3% post-discharge mortality (55/247). Significant predictors of in-hospital mortality included admission Glasgow Coma Scale and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), tachypnea, leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia. Discharge KPS and early fluid resuscitation were significant predictors of post-discharge mortality. Among HIV-infected patients, CD4 count was a significant predictor of post-discharge mortality. Median volume of fluid resuscitation within the first 6 hours of presentation was 500 mLs (IQR 250-1000 mls). Fifty-two different empiric antibacterial regimens were used during the study. Bacteremic patients were more likely to die in hospital than non-bacteremic patients (OR 1.83, 95% CI = 1.01-3.33). Patients with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) bacteremia (25/249) had higher in-hospital mortality (OR 1.97, 95% CI = 1.19-327) and lower median CD4 counts (p = 0.001) than patients without MTB bacteremia. CONCLUSION:Patients presenting with sepsis syndromes to two Ugandan hospitals had late stage HIV infection and high mortality. Bacteremia, especially from MTB, was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Most clinical predictors of in-hospital mortality were easily measurable and can be used for triaging patients in resource-constrained settings. Procurement of low cost and high impact treatments like intravenous fluids and empiric antibiotics may help decrease sepsis-associated mortality in resource-constrained settings

Integrating sepsis management recommendations into clinical care guidelines for district hospitals in resource-limited settings: the necessity to augment new guidelines with future research.

Several factors contribute to the high mortality attributed to severe infections in resource-limited settings. While improvements in survival and processes of care have been made in high-income settings among patients with severe conditions, such as sepsis, guidelines necessary for achieving these improvements may lack applicability or have not been tested in resource-limited settings. The World Health Organizations recent publication of the Integrated Management of Adolescent and Adult Illness District Clinician Manual provides details on how to optimize management of severely ill, hospitalized patients in such settings, including specific guidance on the management of patients with septic shock and respiratory failure without shock. This manuscript provides the context, process and underpinnings of these sepsis guidelines. In light of the current deficits in care and the limitations associated with these guidelines, the authors propose implementing these standardized best practice guidelines while using them as a foundation for sepsis research undertaken in, and directly relevant to, resource-limited settings