KEWENANGAN AJUDIKASI OLEH OMBUDSMAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PELAYANAN PUBLIK

In the Ombudsman Act Ombudsman function not found as the judiciary. But in the Act public service in article 1 paragraph (11) explains that the dispute resolution process is ajudikasi the public service between the Parties decided by the Ombudsman. This type of research is types of normative. From the results of the research can be concluded. That authority ajudikasi the Ombudsman is only regulated in Article 50 of the Act the public service but there is no law on the Ombudsman. The provisions of article 25 of the regulation the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 year 2019 On mechanisms and procedures for Special Ajudikasi, indicating the existence of a legal vacuum.Dalam Undang-Undang Ombudsman tidak ditemukan fungsi Ombudsman sebagai lembaga peradilan. Tetapi dalam Undang-Undang Pelayanan Publik pada Pasal 1 ayat (11) menerangkan bahwa ajudikasi adalah proses penyelesaian sengketa pelayanan publik antarpara pihak yang diputuskan oleh Ombudsman. Jenis Penelitian adalah penelitian normatif. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan. Bahwa kewenangan ajudikasi Ombudsman hanya diatur di dalam Pasal 50 Undang-Undang Pelayanan Publik namun tidak terdapat pada Undang-Undang Ombudsman. Ketentuan Pasal 25 Peraturan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2019 Tentang Mekanisme dan Tata Cara Ajudikasi Khusus, menunjukkan masih adanya kekosongan hukum

Mekanisme Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility) Dalam Kegiatan USAha Pertambangan

The existence of the company in the community can provide the positive and negative aspects. The company provides goods and services needed by the community and the work. But on the other hand it is not uncommon to get people from the impact of the company's business activities. Encourage changes in society in order to create a new view on the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Indonesia, which was awarded the abundant natural resources including minerals mining. The purpose of the study the author wanted to convey in this study: first, know the set corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Second, know the mechanism of implementation of corporate social responsibility in the mining business.This type of research can be classified in this type of normative research using data sources that comprise the primary legal materials, legal materials and secondary legal materials tertiary.From the results of this study concluded. First, setting the CSR contained in Article 74 of Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, Article 15 and Article 34 of Law No. 15 of 2007 on Investment, and Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 19 of 2003 of State Owned Enterprises are packed in the Minister of State Owned Enterprises State No. PER-08/MBU/2013 of Fourth Amendment Regulation of the State Minister for State Owned Enterprises No. PER-05/MBU/2007 about Partnership Program with the State-Owned Enterprises Small Business and Community Development Program, Government Regulation No. 47 of 2012 on Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Company Limited, and the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 53/PUU-VI/2008. Second, steps in implementing CSR consists of the identification, planning, preparation, financing, implementation, documentation, auditing and reporting CSR