Ultrastaging of sentinel lymph nodes in gynecological cancer: Repeating the story of breast cancer? Letter to the editor, Reply to Cibula D, McCluggage WG. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept in cervical cancer: Current limitations and unanswered questions. Gynecol Oncol 2019;152:202–7

SCOPUS: le.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Histologic re-evaluation of a population-based series of renal cell carcinomas from The Netherlands Cohort Study according to the 2022 ISUP/WHO classification

The aim of the present study was to re-evaluate 457 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases from the Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer (NLCS), a large population-based cohort, according to the new 2022 ISUP, Genitourinary Pathology Society and World Health Organisation (WHO) classifications to assess whether newly recognized subtypes of RCC could be found among these cases. These cases were initially evaluated according to the 2004 WHO classification, the Fuhrman grading system and the 3rd version of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM). Data on tumor size, laterality and date of diagnosis, among other clinicopathological characteristics, were obtained through record linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Pathologisch-Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomatiseerd Archief. Digital slides from the NLCS were reviewed by two urogenital pathologists according to the new ISUP grading and the 2022 WHO classification (5th edition). Immunohistochemistry staining for carbonic anhydrase IX was performed on cases with ambiguous morphology. A total of 373 cases of clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 61 cases of papillary RCC (pRCC), 13 cases of chromophobe RCC, 3 cases of collecting duct carcinoma and 4 cases of oncocytoma were identified. The subtyping showed no discrepancy with the previous diagnoses. A comparison of the WHO/ISUP grading to the original Fuhrman grading showed a similar grading in 245 (56.5%) cases of the total ccRCC and pRCC cases. The staging according to the novel TNM classification 8th edition showed a restaging in 286 cases (65.5%). Lymphovascular (microvascular) invasion (LVI) and tumor necrosis (TN) were present in 14.4% and 33.5% of the total number of cases, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation in 5.1% and rhabdoid differentiation in 4.2% of the cases was observed. In conclusion, none of the newly accepted and emerging/provisional RCC entities were identified in the NLCS cases, which could be attributed to the high mean age (71.4 years) at diagnosis of the patients included in the present study. A restaging of the NLCS cases using the TNM 8th edition and regrading using ISUP grading was performed, which showed that it is possible to report on newer features, such as sarcomatoid differentiation and LVI, even in an old sample collection

A Four-Gene Promoter Methylation Marker Panel Consisting of GREM1, NEURL, LAD1, and NEFH Predicts Survival of Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Patients.

Purpose: The currently used prognostic models for patients with nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are based on clinicopathologic features and might be improved by adding molecular markers. Epigenetic alterations occur frequently in ccRCC and are promising biomarkers. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic promoter methylation markers for ccRCC.Experimental Design: We integrated data generated by massive parallel sequencing of methyl-binding domain enriched DNA and microarray-based RNA expression profiling of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine-treated ccRCC cell lines to comprehensively characterize the ccRCC methylome. A selection of the identified methylation markers was evaluated in two independent series of primary ccRCC (n = 150 and n = 185) by methylation-specific PCR. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to estimate cause-specific survival. HRs and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. To assess the predictive capacity and fit of models combining several methylation markers, HarrellC statistic and the Akaike Information Criterion were used.Results: We identified four methylation markers, that is, GREM1, NEURL, LAD1, and NEFH, that individually predicted prognosis of patients with ccRCC. The four markers combined were associated with poorer survival in two independent patient series (HR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.02-13.00 and HR, 7.54; 95% CI, 2.68-21.19). These findings were confirmed in a third series of ccRCC cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (HR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.02-6.40).Conclusions: A four-gene promoter methylation marker panel consisting of GREM1, NEURL, LAD1, and NEFH predicts outcome of patients with ccRCC and might be used to improve current prognostic models. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 2006-18. ©2016 AACR.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe