An approach to building Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP) trainees’ capacities as educators

Field Epidemiology Training Programmes (FETPs), which are modelled after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Epidemic Intelligence Service programme, began in 1980 and have produced graduates in more than 70 countries, including 12 in the Western Pacific Region.1,2 These programmes aim to “build sustainable capacity for detecting and responding to public health threats” and “develop expertise so that disease outbreaks can be detected locally and prevented from spreading”.3 FETPs thus include training in applied epidemiology and public health services. FETP trainees and graduates, however, often have additional responsibilities: mentoring newer trainees, supervising in the field, leading short training courses, facilitating meetings, etc. Programmes therefore must provide trainees with the knowledge and skills to fulfil these responsibilities

Molecular epidemiology of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Mongolia, first experience with nanopore sequencing in lower‐ and middle‐income countries setting

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) has had a significant impact globally, and extensive genomic research has been conducted on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) lineage patterns and its variants. Mongolia's effective response resulted in low prevalence until vaccinations became available. However, due to the lack of systematically collected data and absence of whole genome sequencing capabilities, we conducted a two‐stepped, nationally representative molecular epidemiologic study of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Mongolia for 2020 and 2021. Methods We used retrospective analysis of stored biological samples from November 2020 to October 2021 and a variant‐specific real‐time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) test to detect SARS‐CoV‐2 variants, followed by whole genome sequencing by Nanopore technology. Samples were retrieved from different sites and stored at −70°C deep freezer, and tests were performed on samples with cycle threshold <30. Results Out of 4879 nucleic acid tests, 799 whole genome sequencing had been carried out. Among the stored samples of earlier local transmission, we found the 20B (B.1.1.46) variant predominated in the earlier local transmission period. A slower introduction and circulation of alpha and delta variants were observed compared to global dynamics in 2020 and 2021. Beta or Gamma variants were not detected between November 2020 and September 2021 in Mongolia. Conclusions SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concerns including alpha and delta were delayed in circulation potentially due to public health stringencies in Mongolia. We are sharing our initial experience with whole genome sequencing of SARS‐CoV‐2 from Mongolia, where sequencing data is sparse