Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Optimal timing of invasive treatment

Contains fulltext : 191603.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 19 juni 2018Promotores : Suryapranata, H., Hof, A.W.J. van ’t Co-promotores : Wijngaarden, J. van, Riet, E. van '

Two-year outcome after early or late Intervention in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Contains fulltext : 182932.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcome of an early to a delayed invasive strategy in high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). METHODS: This prospective, multicentre trial included patients with NSTE-ACS and at least two out of three of the following high-risk criteria: (1) evidence of extensive myocardial ischaemia on ECG, (2) elevated biomarkers for myocardial necrosis and (3) age above 65 years. Patients were randomised to either an early (angiography and revascularisation if appropriate 48 hours after randomisation). Endpoint for this prespecified long-term follow-up was the composite incidence of death or reinfarction after 2 years. Data collection was performed by telephone contact with the patients, their relatives or general practitioner and by review of hospital records. RESULTS: Endpoint status after 2-year follow-up was collected in 521 of 542 initially enrolled patients. Incidence of death or reinfarction was 11.8% in the early and 13.1% in the delayed treatment group (relative risk (RR)=0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.42). No significant differences were found in occurrence of the individual components of the primary endpoint: death 6.1% vs 8.9%, RR 0.69 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.27), reinfarction 6.5% vs 5.4%, RR 1.20 (95% CI 0.60 to 2.38). Post-hoc subgroup analysis showed statistical significant interaction between age and treatment strategy on outcome (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years follow-up, no difference in incidence of death or reinfarction was seen between early to late invasive strategy. These findings are in line with results of other studies with longer follow-up. Older patients seem to benefit more from early invasive treatment

Comparison of Outcomes and Intervention Among Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of Those With a Left Circumflex Versus Those With a Non-Left Circumflex-Related Coronary Artery (From the ELISA-3 Trial)

Item does not contain fulltex

Pre-hospital versus hospital acquired HEART score for risk classification of suspected non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Introduction Although increasing evidence shows that in patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) both hospital and pre-hospital acquired HEART (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) scores have strong predictive value, pre-hospital and hospital acquired HEART scores have never been compared directly. Methods In patients with suspected NSTE-ACS, the HEART score was independently prospectively assessed in the pre-hospital setting by ambulance paramedics and in the hospital by physicians. The hospital HEART score was considered the gold standard. Low-risk (HEART score <= 3) was considered a negative test. Endpoint was occurrence of major adverse events within 45 days. Results A total of 699 patients were included in the analyses. In 516 (74%) patients pre-hospital and hospital risk classification was similar, in 50 (7%) pre-hospital risk classification was false negative (45 days mortality 0%) and in 133 (19%) false positive (45 days mortality 1.5%). False negative risk classifications were caused by differences in history (100%), risk factor assessment (66%) and troponin (18%) and were more common in older patients. Occurrence of major adverse events was comparable in pre-hospital and hospital low-risk patients (2.9%vs. 2.7%,p = 0.9). Incidence of major adverse events was 0% in the true negative group, 26% in the true positive group, 10% in the false negative group and 5% in the false positive group. Predictive value of both pre-hospital and hospital acquired HEART scores was high, although the 'area under the curve' of hospital acquired HEART score was higher (0.84vs. 0.74,p < 0.001). Conclusion In approximately 25% of patients hospital and pre-hospital HEART score risk classifications disagree, mainly by risk overestimation in the pre-hospital group. Since disagreement is primarily caused by different scoring of history and risk factors, additional training may improve pre-hospital scoring

Referral decisions based on a pre-hospital HEART score in suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: final results of the FamouS Triage study

Aims Although pre-hospital risk stratification of patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) by ambulance paramedics is feasible, it has not been investigated in daily practice whether referral decisions based on this risk stratification is safe and does not increase major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In Phase III of the FamouS Triage study, it was investigated whether referral decisions by ambulance paramedics based on a pre-hospital HEART score, is non-inferior to routine management. Methods and results FamouS Triage Phase III is a non-inferiority study, comparing the occurrence of MACE before (Phase II) and after (Phase III) implementation of referral decisions based on a pre-hospital HEART score. In Phase II, all patients were risk-stratified and referred to the hospital; in Phase III, low-risk patients (HEART score <= 3) were not referred. Primary endpoint was MACE (acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, or death) within 45 days. A total of 1236 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years, 43% were female, 700 patients were included in the second phase and 536 in the third phase in which 149 low-risk patients (28%) were not transferred to the hospital. Occurrence of 45 days MACE was 16.6% in Phase II and 15.7% in Phase III (P = 0.67). Percentage MACE in low-risk patients was 2.9% in Phase II and 1.3% in Phase III. After adjustments for differences in baseline variables, the hazard ratio of 45 days MACE in Phase III was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.25) as compared to Phase II. Conclusion Pre-hospital risk stratification of patients with suspected NSTE-ACS, avoiding hospitalization of a substantial number of low-risk patients, seems feasible and non-inferior to transferring all patients to the hospital

Accuracy of pre-hospital HEART score risk classification using point of care versus high sensitive troponin in suspected NSTE-ACS

Introduction: Pre-hospital risk classification by the HEART score is performed with point of care troponin assessment. However, point of care troponin is less sensitive than high sensitive troponin measurement which is used in the hospital setting. In this study we compared pre-hospital HEART-score risk classification using point of care troponin versus high sensitive troponin.Methods: In 689 consecutive patients with suspected NSTE-ACS, point of care troponin and laboratory high-sensitive troponin were measured in pre-hospital derived blood. For every patient the HEART score with both point of care troponin (HEART-POC) and high sensitive troponin (HEART-hsTnT) was determined. Endpoint was MACE within 45 days.Results: Mean age was 64 (SD +/- 14), 163 (24%) patients were considered low-risk by HEART-hsTnT and 170 (25%) by HEART-POC. MACE was observed in 17%. Although high sensitive versus POC troponin scoring was different in 130 (19%) of patients, in 678 (98%) patients risk classification in low versus intermediate-high risk was similar. The predictive values of HEART-POC versus HEART-HsTnT was similar (AUC 0.75 versus 0.76, p=0.241).Conclusion: Although high sensitive versus POC troponin scoring was dissimilar in one fifth of patients, this resulted in different patient risk classification in only 2 percent of patients. Therefore POC troponin measurement suffices for pre-hospital risk stratification of suspected NSTE-ACS. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved